How Body Image Becomes Part of Identity
Body image and identity are connected through the ways a person experiences, interprets, evaluates, and socially presents the body across time. Body image encompasses bodily perceptions, appearance-related beliefs, emotional attitudes, and behavioral responses. Identity concerns the developing sense of who one is, including personal continuity, commitments, relationships, social belonging, and a coherent account of oneself. Embodiment connects these processes by locating self-experience in a body that senses, acts, changes, and participates in social life. The body can be experienced simultaneously as the means of living and acting and as an object of personal and social evaluation.
The central psychological question is how physical self-experience acquires meaning within the wider self-concept. Appearance can communicate belonging and individuality, while bodily sensations, movement, capability, and agency sustain a more immediate sense of being oneself. The importance assigned to any particular appearance characteristic varies with development, culture, relationships, discrimination, health, and personal values. Consequently, appearance satisfaction, body ownership, social identity, and overall self-worth must be investigated as related but distinct constructs. An influential contemporary conceptual paper describes embodiment as an integration of experiencing oneself as a body and relating to the body as something one has; its proposed connection to identity provides a theoretical framework requiring direct empirical tests of individual pathways (Lundh and Foster, 2024).
Identity is an organizing process rather than a score on an attractiveness scale. A person can value style and presentation while regarding competence, ethical commitments, intimacy, creativity, and community as equally central aspects of the self. Another person may attach intense personal significance to how others perceive a feature of their body. Such differences become scientifically informative when researchers specify the self-representations, contextual triggers, and consequences under examination.
Conceptual Architecture: Body Image, Body Schema, and Self-Concept
Evaluative body image and the lived body
Evaluative body image concerns what a person thinks and feels about body shape, weight, appearance, or particular features. It includes satisfaction and dissatisfaction, the importance attached to appearance, and strategies such as comparison, checking, concealment, grooming, and avoidance. The lived-body perspective concerns how a person experiences space, posture, movement, touch, internal sensation, fatigue, pain, and capacity for action. These facets can change independently: someone may feel comfortable in movement yet be dissatisfied with a visible feature, or may appreciate their appearance while struggling with altered bodily sensation after an illness.
Treating body image as multidimensional prevents the mistake of interpreting any unfavorable appearance judgment as global alienation from the body. Positive body image research, for example, studies acceptance and respect for the body as constructs that carry information beyond low dissatisfaction. In a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing 240 papers, body appreciation was associated with self-esteem, self-compassion, and indices of well-being, even after accounting for negative body image; however, only eight included studies examined prospective relationships (Linardon et al., 2022). The robust cross-sectional pattern therefore supplies stronger evidence of association than of direction of causation.
Body schema and multisensory representation
Body schema generally refers to sensorimotor representations that support posture, movement, and action, frequently operating with limited deliberate awareness. Body image in psychological research includes more explicit perceptions and evaluations, although terminology varies across disciplines. Multisensory representations integrate vision, touch, proprioception, and signals associated with motor commands. Experimental body-ownership illusions show how coordinated sensory cues can influence where an individual experiences a body part to be located. These experiments study components of bodily self-awareness; they do not establish that a laboratory illusion alters a person's enduring identity or diagnoses a disturbance (Braun et al., 2018).
Body ownership is the felt experience that a body or body part belongs to oneself. Agency is the experienced initiation or control of actions. Their usual co-occurrence can be experimentally differentiated, and clinical disruptions provide further evidence that they are distinct processes. This distinction matters for body-image research because insecurity about attractiveness does not entail a loss of body ownership, and a neurological change in movement agency need not imply dissatisfaction with appearance (Braun et al., 2018).
Self-concept, social identity, and continuity
Self-concept refers to organized beliefs and representations about oneself. The physical self is one domain within a wider system encompassing relationships, abilities, values, roles, and aspirations. Self-esteem describes an evaluative sense of worth and is often studied separately from body esteem or appearance evaluation. Personal identity includes continuity over time: an individual recognizes the self across photographs, changing roles, health transitions, and aging, even as physical features change. Social identity concerns the personal significance of membership and categorization, including how the body becomes visible within institutions, communities, and cultural norms.
Appearance can function as an identity symbol through clothing, hair, adornment, grooming, and other forms of self-presentation. Symbolic meaning is contextual. The same feature may signify family history in one setting, religious or cultural belonging in another, and an individual aesthetic choice in a third. Researchers need to elicit the person's interpretation rather than project stereotyped meanings onto visible traits. Social recognition or stigmatization can influence whether a self-presentation choice feels affirming, constrained, or threatening.
Embodiment: Interoception, Ownership, and Agency
Interoception and the internal bodily self
Interoception is the processing of signals concerning internal bodily conditions, including physiological states relevant to hunger, heartbeat, temperature, respiration, and visceral sensations. Research distinguishes interoceptive accuracy on particular tasks, subjective sensibility or reported attention to bodily states, and metacognitive awareness. These measures are not interchangeable. A person may report paying close attention to bodily sensations without performing unusually accurately on a heartbeat task, and subjective attention can be adaptive or anxious depending on circumstances.
Badoud and Tsakiris reviewed behavioral and neuroimaging research suggesting that interoception may contribute to body image through its interaction with outward-facing sensory representations. Their model helps explain how internal bodily signals and visual representations might jointly shape the experienced bodily self, but the field remains heterogeneous in tasks and definitions (Badoud and Tsakiris, 2017). Research on interoception and self-concept proposes that physiological signals may contribute to the coherence of personal identity; its predictions should be evaluated as evolving neurocognitive hypotheses rather than a universal account of identity (Interoception and the concept of self review).
Bodily awareness has an emotional dimension. Internal signals become meaningful in relation to memories, expectations, safety, and action opportunities. Heightened bodily vigilance may accompany anxiety, while a flexible capacity to notice bodily needs can support self-care. The psychological implications depend on what signals are noticed, how they are interpreted, and whether attention promotes participation or reinforces avoidance. Simple instructions to increase bodily awareness are therefore insufficient as a universal intervention.
The body as a source of action and possibility
Embodiment includes what bodies enable people to do: communicating, perceiving, resting, creating, expressing affection, navigating environments, and engaging with others. Functionality appreciation is a positive-body-image construct referring to valuing these capacities, including capacities beyond fitness, appearance, or productivity. Its inclusive application requires attention to disability, fluctuating health, pain, fatigue, and the individual's own valued forms of participation. Respect for a body cannot be made conditional on physical performance.
In the randomized Expand Your Horizon trial, 81 women with negative body image received functionality-focused writing exercises or an active control condition. The intervention group showed improvements in appearance satisfaction, functionality satisfaction, and body appreciation, along with reduced self-objectification (Alleva et al., 2015). A subsequent randomized study of 261 young adult women replicated improvements through a one-month follow-up, although the proposed body-complexity and body-self-integration mediators were not supported (Alleva et al., 2018). The evidence supports specific short-term effects on body-image measures; it does not establish a lasting transformation of personal identity.
How Appearance Becomes Personally Significant
Appearance investment and self-definition
People differ in how much their appearance organizes everyday choices and self-evaluation. Appearance investment concerns the importance, attention, and behavioral priority assigned to looking a particular way. It is distinct from being satisfied with the result. Someone may invest time and creativity in self-presentation without believing that appearance determines personal worth. Conversely, an individual may give appearance high evaluative importance and experience repeated threat from minor changes. The Appearance Schemas Inventory–Revised was developed to assess appearance-related assumptions and investment more precisely; its score must be interpreted within the instrument's construct and the population in which it has been validated (Cash et al., 2004).
Appearance becomes identity-relevant when it carries perceived information about acceptability, desirability, status, age, health, competence, or membership. These meanings may be endorsed, resisted, or strategically negotiated. Cognitive processes then include selective attention to a feature, memory for appearance comments, anticipation of evaluation, and interpretations of ambiguous social feedback. Researchers should distinguish objectively documented discrimination from a person's prediction of how strangers will respond, since each has different implications for support and intervention.
Actual, ideal, and socially expected selves
Self-discrepancy theory distinguishes representations of an actual self from ideals and perceived obligations. A discrepancy between perceived appearance and an idealized image can contribute to disappointment or dissatisfaction; a discrepancy involving socially prescribed standards may be associated with anxiety about judgment or failure. Higgins' theory supplies general predictions about self-representations and emotions, while application to specific appearance contexts requires empirical evidence (Higgins, 1987). The same perceived feature may have very different psychological consequences depending on whether it is treated as a small preference or as a condition for belonging.
Rigid appearance contingencies can narrow opportunities for exploration. An adolescent who believes social acceptance depends on appearance may avoid an activity in which the body becomes visible; an adult may postpone an important relationship or professional goal until a perceived physical improvement is achieved. Such consequences arise through specific beliefs and behaviors. The existence of a desired appearance change alone provides no evidence of dysfunction.
Self-objectification and the observer's perspective
Objectification theory examines the consequences of learning to view one's body from an external observer's perspective. Self-objectification and habitual body surveillance can increase the salience of visible features during activities that would otherwise draw attention to learning, movement, connection, or pleasure. The theory originally focused on the social context of women's sexual objectification and has since motivated research involving more diverse populations (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997).
A systematic review and meta-analysis covering 318 studies found moderate positive associations among self-objectification, body shame, and body dissatisfaction, with variation across age, gender, and racial groups. The evidence base disproportionately sampled White cisgender women, and correlated survey measures limit causal inferences (Saunders et al., 2024). The clinical significance of surveillance depends on persistence, distress, avoidance, and functioning, rather than on occasional self-consciousness.
Identity Formation and Bodily Change Across Life
Childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood
Physical development changes both the experienced body and how it is socially evaluated. During adolescence, pubertal change, peer comparison, sexual development, and new responsibilities can make appearance especially salient. Yet identity development is also shaped by education, attachment relationships, family expectations, creative interests, social participation, and cultural belonging. Researchers should not treat adolescence as a uniform period of declining body satisfaction.
A longitudinal meta-analysis of 142 samples and 128,254 participants examined mean-level changes across body-image constructs, including satisfaction, esteem, self-objectification, and body shame. Its results support a developmental perspective in which specific constructs follow different trajectories across age and study contexts (Lacroix et al., 2023). Such group-level findings cannot predict a particular adolescent's identity or individual course. Repeated personal assessments, when appropriate, capture change more meaningfully than comparing an individual with a general developmental stereotype.
Adult transitions and bodily continuity
Pregnancy, childbirth, menopause, gender-related body changes, chronic illness, injury, medication effects, and aging can alter bodily experience and public treatment. Psychological adaptation may involve integrating new capacities, changing appearance expectations, negotiating social attention, and revising familiar activities. The meaning of a transition depends on whether it is desired, medically necessary, socially supported, or associated with pain or exclusion. Identity continuity can coexist with a changed relationship to appearance.
An experimental study of a functionality-focused writing exercise among mothers of young children found immediate improvements in state body appreciation and functionality appreciation, but its brief observation period leaves longer-term identity outcomes uncertain (Expand Your Horizon in motherhood trial). People with health-related bodily change may benefit from interventions oriented toward valued participation as well as appearance-specific concerns. In women with rheumatoid arthritis, a randomized trial found improved body-image outcomes following a functionality-focused program relative to waitlist control, with short follow-up (Alleva et al., 2018, rheumatoid arthritis trial).
Gender, culture, and social recognition
Gender identity, gender expression, and body image can interact without being equivalent. Experiences of bodily congruence, social recognition, medical choice, and appearance-related discrimination differ markedly across individuals. Assessment must distinguish distress associated with an unwanted visible feature, distress caused by exclusion or harassment, and any condition-specific clinical criteria when relevant. Cultural communities also vary in the meaning assigned to size, complexion, hair, adornment, aging, and physical capability. A measurement tool validated in a narrow demographic sample cannot automatically establish comparable scores across cultures or gender-diverse groups.
For racial and ethnic minorities and people with visible differences or disabilities, external appearance judgments may reflect discriminatory structures. Interventions focused only on changing the individual's perception can miss the actual social environment. Psychological research should therefore document stigmatizing experiences and material access to care while respecting how individuals describe their identities and bodies. The objective of care is improved well-being, choice, participation, and safety as defined collaboratively with the person.
Social Comparison, Digital Images, and Identity
Comparing one's appearance with peers, celebrities, or edited images can influence perceived standards and the meaning attached to one's physical traits. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal and ecological studies found small bidirectional prospective associations between appearance comparison and body dissatisfaction among women; the meta-analysis of eight eligible longitudinal studies reported correlations of approximately 0.08 in each direction (Ooi et al., 2025). The modest average sizes matter: appearance comparison is one pathway among many, and short-term emotional responses should not be confused with lasting identity change.
Digital self-presentation introduces opportunities for experimentation and expression as well as intensified surveillance. Edited photographs, beauty filters, and algorithmically selected images may affect what a person perceives as ordinary or desirable. An important distinction is between overall time online and appearance-specific practices, including repeated comparison, ideal internalization, self-monitoring, and feedback seeking. The digital context warrants study through longitudinal and experimental methods rather than broad assumptions about all users or platforms. See the separately owned Social Media and Body Image research article for detailed digital mechanisms.
Appearance-based identity claims also travel through stereotypes: expectations about age, weight, hair, race, disability, and gender presentation may be imposed by observers. Observed treatment by others can influence opportunities and distress independently of appearance satisfaction. The individual's self-concept may incorporate, reinterpret, or challenge these social categories. Researchers must avoid equating a stereotype's social prevalence with its factual accuracy.
Positive Body Image and the Breadth of the Self
Body appreciation and identity flexibility
Body appreciation includes respect for the body, recognition of its needs, and a capacity to maintain a supportive attitude toward physical self-experience. The Body Appreciation Scale-2 was refined and psychometrically evaluated in several samples of women and men; it measures a defined positive-body-image construct, rather than global identity integration (Tylka and Wood-Barcalow, 2015). A person can remain dissatisfied with a feature while appreciating their body and continuing meaningful activities. Positive body image is therefore psychologically informative alongside appearance satisfaction and global self-esteem.
Identity flexibility refers here descriptively to the ability to value multiple domains of oneself rather than allowing one appearance characteristic to dominate. The term describes a possible clinical formulation, not an established independent diagnosis or a proprietary psychometric construct. Examples include maintaining relationships despite visible change, participating in valued activity while feeling self-conscious, and evaluating oneself in terms of skills, commitments, and belonging. The hypothesis that a more diversified self-concept buffers appearance-related threat is plausible but cannot be inferred directly from correlations between body appreciation and well-being.
Functionality appreciation and meaningful participation
Functionality-focused activities invite attention to bodily capacities in personally meaningful, accessible terms. People might appreciate seeing and listening, breathing, touching, communicating, expressing emotion, or resting; disability and illness change which examples are relevant, and a person should define their own possibilities. Reframing the body entirely as a performance instrument can create new standards of worth. A supportive intervention connects body respect with self-defined activities while allowing grief, frustration, and ambivalence about limitations.
Among adolescent girls receiving eating-disorder care, a 2025 randomized study tested a single functionality-writing session. Positive body image increased immediately relative to an active control, while negative body image did not change; the follow-up was measured over minutes rather than months (Glashouwer et al., 2025). The finding illustrates why a positive change on one body-image scale should not be generalized to remission of a clinical disorder, stable identity development, or the effectiveness of an entire treatment program.
Studying and Measuring the Body–Identity Relationship
Match the method to the scientific construct
A scientific study of appearance satisfaction may use a validated self-report questionnaire, while work on body ownership may use multisensory illusion paradigms, behavioral localization tasks, or neurological examination. Identity research may assess self-concept clarity, personal narratives, roles, and social belonging. Interoceptive research may measure task performance or reported bodily attention. Combining these tools can be valuable when the hypotheses justify it, but combining their scores into a single generic indicator of embodiment risks obscuring the processes being measured.
For appearance investment, the Appearance Schemas Inventory–Revised addresses appearance-related cognitive and behavioral assumptions (Cash et al., 2004). For positive body image, BAS-2 measures body appreciation (Tylka and Wood-Barcalow, 2015). For broader developmental research, repeated measures can reveal within-person change and reduce reliance on cross-sectional age differences. Researchers should document item interpretation, language adaptation, reliability, measurement invariance, missing-data patterns, and the population to which an inference applies.
Correlation, experiments, and longitudinal evidence
Cross-sectional correlations can establish that body appreciation, appearance investment, or self-objectification relates to self-esteem at the same moment. They cannot determine whether body image changes identity, identity orientations influence body image, or a third factor affects both. Longitudinal designs improve temporal ordering, but remain vulnerable to unmeasured confounding and differences in measurement interval. Experiments can test whether a defined manipulation changes a specified short-term outcome, while clinical follow-up is necessary to evaluate durable functional improvement.
The scientific record contains useful convergences and decisive gaps. Multisensory experiments provide evidence for some bodily ownership mechanisms. Randomized functionality interventions support improvements on selected body-image outcomes. Large reviews establish associations between body appreciation and well-being and between self-objectification and body dissatisfaction. Evidence that these effects cause durable, generalized changes in personal identity is much more limited. Explicitly identifying the unit of inference protects against exaggerated interpretations of compelling laboratory phenomena.
Limits of measurement across groups
Many influential studies have centered on young adult women from relatively advantaged educational settings. The 2024 self-objectification synthesis identified substantial demographic concentration within the available literature (Saunders et al., 2024). Comparable constructs may be expressed differently in men, older adults, disabled people, transgender and nonbinary people, and individuals from different cultural communities. Before interpreting group means, investigators need evidence that items operate comparably. Clinical thresholds derived in one population require separate validation elsewhere.
When Body-Related Identity Distress Requires Clinical Attention
Body dissatisfaction refers to unfavorable evaluation of appearance. Appearance anxiety concerns fear of negative judgment because of appearance. Body-image disturbance is a broader research or clinical descriptor that may include intrusive preoccupation, avoidance, perceptual complaints, and behavior; its meaning depends on the condition being examined. None of these terms on its own constitutes a diagnosis. A clinician assesses duration, severity, functional impairment, associated behaviors, medical context, and relevant diagnostic criteria.
Body dysmorphic disorder is characterized by preoccupation with perceived appearance defects that are not observable or appear slight to others, accompanied by repetitive behaviors or mental acts and clinically significant distress or impairment. It requires individualized diagnostic evaluation. Eating disorders involve their own defined psychological and behavioral criteria; body concerns may be present in different forms across diagnoses. Muscle dysmorphia is a recognized specifier of body dysmorphic disorder in DSM-based classification. Social anxiety may include appearance-related fear but is distinguished by the full pattern of feared social scrutiny and diagnostic criteria. Neurological alterations of ownership or agency require a different medical and neuropsychological assessment pathway.
Clinical evaluation also considers depression, anxiety, trauma, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, compulsive checking, nutritional risk, and significant social avoidance when these are relevant. A person living with a visible difference, a disability, a larger body, or a gender-diverse identity is not thereby exhibiting psychopathology. Distress can arise from discrimination, inadequate access, pain, or hostile social conditions. When intense preoccupation, self-harm thoughts, or suicidal ideation is present, professional assessment must address safety directly, and acute danger warrants immediate emergency support. The detailed diagnostic and therapeutic owners remain the separately published Body Dysmorphic Disorder vs Body Dissatisfaction and relevant disorder-specific clinical articles.
Psychological Support and Intervention Implications
The most defensible treatment formulation starts by identifying the person's actual difficulties: a self-concept narrowly contingent on appearance, an exhausting comparison habit, distress after illness, interpersonal stigma, avoidance, or a diagnosable disorder. The goals, mechanisms, and standards of evidence differ. Supported care may involve attention to appearance-related beliefs, reduction of compulsive safety behaviors where clinically indicated, compassionate engagement with bodily experiences, work on identity and values, accessible participation, or practical responses to bullying and discrimination.
Functionality-writing programs have randomized-trial evidence for selected body-image outcomes in specific populations, including young adult women; benefits have been observed over short follow-up intervals (Alleva et al., 2015; Alleva et al., 2018). Body appreciation and self-compassion show promising associations with well-being, but correlational results cannot specify a treatment dose or prove that changing body appreciation causes identity integration. Cognitive behavioral interventions may be appropriate for persistent dysfunctional beliefs or behavioral avoidance, while diagnosed BDD and eating disorders call for disorder-specific evidence-based assessment and treatment.
Social and environmental supports are part of the scientific picture. Reducing weight stigma, harassment, exclusion, and appearance-based discrimination can address actual sources of distress rather than assigning responsibility exclusively to individual self-evaluation. Within therapy or education, questions about desired identity, relationships, abilities, values, belonging, and bodily comfort often reveal more than asking whether a person likes how they look. Good practice follows the individual's goals and does not impose an ideal of unconditional body positivity.
Scientific Debates and Unanswered Questions
One debate concerns whether embodiment should be treated as a unifying explanation of identity or as a family of related processes. Phenomenological models emphasize lived experience and the relationship between being and having a body; cognitive neuroscience tests particular mechanisms of ownership, action, and internal sensation. These approaches can inform each other, but broad philosophical claims about selfhood are conceptually different from experimentally estimated effects (Lundh and Foster, 2024).
Another debate concerns developmental and causal specificity. Cross-sectional evidence consistently links positive body image with well-being, yet prospective evidence is scarce relative to the number of observational studies. Researchers need better tests of whether changing appearance contingencies, interoceptive awareness, self-objectification, or functionality appreciation changes identity-related outcomes independently of general mood, social support, and preexisting self-esteem (Linardon et al., 2022).
Digital environments introduce rapidly shifting forms of self-presentation and algorithmic appearance normalization. Longitudinal and experimental studies need to disentangle exposure from self-selection, appearance-focused practices from general screen time, and short-term emotions from durable self-representations. Research samples should include people whose bodily experiences have often been underrepresented, including disabled, older, gender-diverse, and culturally heterogeneous participants. Greater measurement invariance and explicit evidence grading will be especially important when claims are translated into preventive interventions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is body image the same as identity?
Body image describes perceptions, evaluations, feelings, and behaviors involving the body. Identity is a broader organization of personal continuity, roles, commitments, self-understanding, and social belonging. Body image can be important to identity, but its relative importance differs across people and life stages.
What does embodiment add to body-image psychology?
Embodiment brings bodily sensations, ownership, agency, movement, and lived participation into the analysis. It explains why body experience cannot be adequately represented by appearance ratings alone. Affective and cultural meanings also shape embodied life, while specific neurocognitive mechanisms require their own measures and evidence.
Can a person dislike their appearance and still have a positive body image?
Yes. Positive body image includes respect, appreciation, and acceptance that can coexist with dissatisfaction about particular features. The distinction is supported by studies showing that body appreciation carries information beyond measures of negative body image (Linardon et al., 2022).
Does a change in appearance change personal identity?
Appearance changes can reshape self-presentation, social experience, bodily comfort, and personal narratives. The extent of identity change depends on the person's meaning-making, relationships, developmental context, and circumstances. No general research finding implies that a visible change automatically alters the underlying continuity of the person.
How can someone reduce the power of appearance over self-worth?
Useful steps may include identifying rigid appearance-related assumptions, reducing exhausting comparison and checking habits, maintaining valued activities, investing in relationships and interests, and developing a respectful relationship with bodily needs and capacities. Persistent distress or major functional impairment warrants individualized professional assessment. Specific intervention evidence should be matched to the target problem rather than generalized from body-image surveys.
When are body-image concerns a clinical disorder?
Clinical significance depends on the pattern of symptoms, associated behaviors, distress, impairment, and the criteria for a particular diagnosis. Body dissatisfaction by itself is not BDD, an eating disorder, or a neurological ownership disturbance. Screening tools can guide referral but do not replace a qualified diagnostic evaluation.
Related Articles
Body Image and Appearance Psychology — the central scientific account of body image, appearance evaluation, and related research traditions.
Body Image Psychology: Definition, Components, and Development — foundational concepts and development across body-image dimensions.
Body Image and Self-Esteem: Connections and Differences — appearance-specific evaluation and global self-worth.
Positive Body Image: Appreciation, Acceptance, and Research — acceptance, body appreciation, and related evidence.
Body Image Assessment: Measures, Questionnaires, and Clinical Limits — scale selection, measurement boundaries, and clinical assessment.
Body Dissatisfaction: Causes, Signs, and Psychological Effects — dissatisfaction as a distinct evaluative construct.
Self-Objectification and Body Surveillance: Mechanisms and Effects — outward-facing bodily attention and habitual surveillance.
Social Media and Body Image: Appearance Comparison, Ideals, and Mental Health — the separate digital environment and comparison intent.
References
Alleva, J. M., Martijn, C., van Breukelen, G. J. P., Jansen, A., and Karos, K. (2015). Expand Your Horizon: A programme that improves body image and reduces self-objectification by training women to focus on body functionality. Body Image, 15, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.07.001
Alleva, J. M., Diedrichs, P. C., Halliwell, E., Martijn, C., Stuijfzand, B. G., Treneman-Evans, G., and Rumsey, N. (2018). A randomised-controlled trial investigating potential underlying mechanisms of a functionality-based approach to improving women's body image. Body Image, 25, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.02.009
Alleva, J. M., Diedrichs, P. C., Halliwell, E., Peters, M. L., Dures, E., Stuijfzand, B. G., and Rumsey, N. (2018). More than my RA: A randomized trial investigating body image improvement among women with rheumatoid arthritis using a functionality-focused intervention program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000317
Badoud, D., and Tsakiris, M. (2017). From the body's viscera to the body's image: Is there a link between interoception and body image concerns? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.017
Braun, N., Debener, S., Spychala, N., Bongartz, E., Sörös, P., Müller, H. H. O., and Philipsen, A. (2018). The senses of agency and ownership: A review. Frontiers in Psychology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29713301/
Cash, T. F., Melnyk, S. E., and Hrabosky, J. I. (2004). The assessment of body image investment: An extensive revision of the Appearance Schemas Inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10264
Fredrickson, B. L., and Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Glashouwer, K. A., Weiland, S., and Alleva, J. M. (2025). Expand Your Horizon: Testing a brief writing intervention focused on body functionality among adolescent girls with an eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24444
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
Lacroix, E., Smith, A. J., Husain, I. A., Orth, U., and von Ranson, K. M. (2023). Normative body image development: A longitudinal meta-analysis of mean-level change. Body Image, 45, 238–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.03.003
Linardon, J., McClure, Z., Tylka, T. L., and Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2022). Body appreciation and its psychological correlates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Body Image, 42, 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.07.003
Lundh, L.-G., and Foster, L. (2024). Embodiment as a synthesis of having a body and being a body, and its role in self-identity and mental health. New Ideas in Psychology, 74, 101083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101083
Ooi, W. L., Nasser, H., Simmons, J., and Krug, I. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the temporal relationship between appearance comparisons and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 53, 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101885
Saunders, J. F., Nutter, S., Waugh, R., and Hayden, K. A. (2024). Testing body-related components of objectification theory: A meta-analysis of the relations between body shame, self-objectification, and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 50, 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101738
Tylka, T. L., and Wood-Barcalow, N. L. (2015). The Body Appreciation Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image, 12, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.09.006