Video game withdrawal symptoms are unpleasant emotional, cognitive, or behavioral experiences reported by some people when they stop gaming, substantially reduce play, or cannot access a game they want to play. Irritability, restlessness, anxiety, sadness, boredom, persistent thoughts about gaming, and strong urges to resume are among the commonly described experiences. Their presence is meaningful clinical information, but there is no validated rule by which distress after stopping games alone establishes gaming disorder. Research has yet to demonstrate a single characteristic withdrawal syndrome, a reliable duration, or a specific biological mechanism common to affected players. The most relevant systematic and scoping reviews describe heterogeneous definitions and limited experimental evidence. Kaptsis et al., 2016; Starzec et al., 2024.
The appropriate question is what happens when gaming stops, how that change relates to prior patterns of play and mental health, and whether there is persistent loss of control and functional impairment. A person can miss gaming intensely because it has provided social connection, stimulation, structure, or emotional relief. A smaller group may experience a broader pattern of problematic gaming that warrants a comprehensive clinical assessment. Withdrawal-like symptoms are one piece of that assessment, never the complete conclusion. World Health Organization; American Psychiatric Association.
What researchers mean by gaming withdrawal
In substance medicine, withdrawal commonly describes a characteristic response to reducing or stopping exposure after physiological adaptation. Researchers adapted the term for behavioral addictions to investigate whether repeated engagement in a highly rewarding activity can make its interruption aversive. In video gaming, this adaptation raises separate questions: whether an emotional response occurs, whether it is systematically caused by gaming deprivation, whether it predicts a disorder, and whether it has features that distinguish it from frustration or ordinary disappointment. These questions require different kinds of evidence. Kaptsis et al., 2016.
Much of the literature calls a self-reported feeling of irritability or restlessness "withdrawal" after asking a retrospective survey question. This method detects perceptions and associations, while leaving the timing and mechanism uncertain. An experiment that observes the same person before and after a controlled period without gaming can address short-term changes more directly. Even that experiment must consider sleep, other leisure activities, expectations, social obligations, and the difference between a voluntary break and involuntary loss of access. Starzec et al., 2024.
Withdrawal, craving, frustration, and boredom
Craving is a strong desire to play, which may be triggered by a game notification, an unfinished mission, an online friend, a competitive event, or memories of reward. Frustration is an emotional response to an interrupted goal. Boredom can follow the sudden removal of a familiar source of stimulation. Anxiety or sadness may reflect the loss of an important coping activity or social environment. All can accompany gaming restriction, but they are conceptually different and may have different clinical implications. King et al., 2017; Kaptsis et al., 2016.
The distinction matters in everyday settings. A student disappointed by a canceled team match, an esports competitor worried about losing a season ranking, and an adolescent who relies on a game to see close friends can each become upset when access ends. Their distress should be understood within their circumstances. A clinical interpretation becomes stronger when there is a recurrent, impairing pattern of difficulty controlling gaming and continuing it despite significant consequences.
Symptoms described in the scientific literature
Irritability, anger, and emotional tension
Irritability is among the most frequently reported withdrawal-like states in both screening instruments and reviews. Some players describe becoming short-tempered, easily frustrated, or unusually reactive after access to games is restricted. Researchers must separate sustained changes in mood from an understandable reaction to a conflict with parents, an abrupt rule, or a lost social appointment. The intensity, duration, context, and consequences of the reaction all matter. Kaptsis et al., 2016; Bočanová, 2024.
Restlessness and an urge to return
Restlessness can include feeling unsettled, pacing, difficulty finding a satisfying substitute activity, and checking whether the game has become available. Persistent thoughts about a game or repeated attempts to resume may be linked to learned cues and anticipated reward. Yet a person who repeatedly checks for messages from a gaming community may be seeking social contact. Clinical interviews should therefore ask what exactly is missed: the mechanics of play, competitive achievement, a routine, emotional regulation, or relationships. Kaptsis et al., 2016.
Anxiety, sadness, and low mood
Some questionnaires include anxiety and sadness within proposed gaming withdrawal criteria. These feelings warrant attention, especially when they are substantial or persist across different situations. They also occur with depression, generalized anxiety, loneliness, family conflict, disrupted sleep, and many ordinary stressors. Cross-sectional correlations between withdrawal scores and depression or anxiety scores cannot establish which condition came first. American Psychiatric Association; Starzec et al., 2026.
Boredom, reduced stimulation, and diminished enjoyment
A gaming break can expose the lack of alternative activities in a person's routine. Fast feedback, rapidly changing goals, familiar rituals, and frequent social exchanges may make slower activities feel unrewarding temporarily. In prospective work involving an 84-hour break, participants often described boredom and a desire for mental stimulation. That account does not establish a physiological withdrawal state, and it points to the importance of rebuilding meaningful activities rather than treating all discomfort as a sign of addiction. King et al., 2016.
Sleep, appetite, headaches, and physical sensations
Physical experiences such as headaches, sweating, fatigue, changes in sleep, and appetite differences have appeared in questionnaires and individual reports. The evidence that these form a consistent gaming-specific physical withdrawal syndrome is limited. A headache after stopping games may relate to stress, dehydration, caffeine, sleep disruption, illness, or prolonged screen use before the break. Clinical care should investigate physical symptoms through ordinary medical assessment rather than automatically attributing them to gaming. Starzec et al., 2024; Starzec et al., 2026.
Diagnostic status: ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR
ICD-11 gaming disorder
The World Health Organization identifies gaming disorder in ICD-11 as a persistent pattern of impaired control over gaming, increasing priority given to gaming over other activities, and continuation or escalation despite negative consequences. The pattern must produce significant impairment in important areas of functioning and would normally have been evident for at least 12 months. Withdrawal is not one of the defining ICD-11 requirements. Someone can meet its core clinical pattern without reporting withdrawal symptoms; someone else may report irritability after gaming ends without meeting the disorder criteria. World Health Organization.
DSM-5-TR Internet Gaming Disorder
In DSM-5-TR, Internet Gaming Disorder appears as a condition for further study. Its proposed research criteria include withdrawal-like feelings when Internet gaming is removed or impossible, often described as irritability, anxiety, or sadness. A proposed criterion list is not equivalent to an established diagnostic rule for all gaming behavior. The American Psychiatric Association describes the construct as requiring clinically significant distress or impairment and differentiates gaming from broad Internet use, social-media activity, and gambling. American Psychiatric Association.
The classifications therefore make different decisions about the role of withdrawal. ICD-11 centers control, priority, persistence, and impairment, whereas the DSM research proposal includes withdrawal among a larger symptom list. Treating the two as interchangeable would inflate the diagnostic meaning of a brief mood change and obscure why the classifications diverge. World Health Organization; American Psychiatric Association.
What reviews establish and what they leave unresolved
Early systematic evidence
A systematic review by Kaptsis and colleagues examined 34 publications across qualitative, psychometric, and treatment literature. Irritability and restlessness were especially common descriptions, but studies differed substantially in how they framed and measured withdrawal. Detailed clinical accounts were scarce, and the natural symptom course following treatment was inadequately described. The review's conclusion supports investigating withdrawal carefully rather than assuming that every proposed criterion was already validated. Kaptsis et al., 2016.
Subsequent systematic and scoping reviews
A 2024 systematic review of 29 studies found inconsistent definitions of craving, abstinence, and withdrawal; the literature still favored affective experiences over detailed cognitive and physiological observation. The authors called for longitudinal and qualitative work. Separately, a 2024 scoping review of 40 studies found that most evidence came from convenience samples and self-report correlations, with only six experimental studies involving abstinence control. The small experimental foundation remains an important limitation on causal interpretation. Bočanová, 2024; Starzec et al., 2024.
These reviews overlap in the literature they examine and should not be treated as independent prevalence estimates or added together as though each counted unique studies. Their convergent finding is methodological: reports of unpleasant feelings exist, while standardization, clinical specificity, and longitudinal observation remain underdeveloped. The frequency of a questionnaire endorsement cannot establish the population prevalence of a clinical withdrawal syndrome.
Experimental studies: what happens when gaming is stopped?
Prospective observation during an 84-hour break
A small prospective study followed regular adult online gamers, including participants who met proposed Internet Gaming Disorder criteria, across 84 hours without gaming. Participants were assessed repeatedly for gaming urges, thoughts about gaming, and related distress. Among the IGD-positive subgroup, reported withdrawal-like symptoms showed their largest decline within the first 24 hours, with later changes also observed. This pattern cautions against automatically assuming that symptoms steadily worsen with each day without gaming. The pilot's small, self-selected sample and short follow-up make the precise trajectory provisional. Kaptsis et al., 2016.
A companion qualitative analysis of the same abstinence experience identified boredom, mental stimulation, anticipated rewards, cues, and isolation among participants' concerns. These findings illuminate the meaning of the experience but do not validate a single universal syndrome. A voluntary break in a study also differs from forced disconnection, hospitalization, parental confiscation, or a change in employment or schooling. King et al., 2016.
Controlled adolescent gaming abstinence
A randomized controlled study with 37 adolescents examined a brief gaming abstinence intervention against a comparison condition. Both groups reported reductions in withdrawal-related measures after baseline. Participants asked to abstain described boredom as well as renewed participation in family and outdoor activities. The findings gave limited support to the intervention's original hypotheses and raised the possibility that measurement and self-monitoring themselves influenced outcomes. This was a small intervention study in a selected group, not proof that every adolescent benefits from a mandatory detoxification regimen. Evans et al., 2018.
Abstinence as a clinical technique
An uncontrolled pilot involving 24 adults found favorable changes after a voluntary 84-hour gaming break, including reductions in problematic gaming cognitions and self-reported symptoms during subsequent follow-up. Such findings offer a reason to study brief breaks as one possible behavioral exercise. They cannot isolate abstinence from expectancy, motivation, monitoring, changing routines, regression to the mean, or social support. The evidence does not justify treating a fixed-length gaming break as a universally effective medical protocol. King et al., 2017.
A further study of help-seeking adults found that greater withdrawal complaints were associated with difficulty adhering to planned abstinence; associations do not establish that withdrawal caused the difficulty. This distinction is important when designing support plans: anticipated discomfort may signal a need for preparation and collaborative follow-up rather than a requirement to stop abruptly. King et al., 2018.
Mechanisms and competing explanations
Reward learning and cue reactivity
Modern games organize feedback through achievements, ranked competition, social recognition, variable goals, anticipation, and persistent virtual environments. Repeated exposure can strengthen expectations that playing will provide stimulation or relief. When a player encounters a familiar cue without being able to respond, frustration and urges can follow. This is a plausible learning-based account of some withdrawal-like states; gaming-specific experiments have not established a unique neurochemical withdrawal process corresponding to substance withdrawal. Starzec et al., 2024.
Negative reinforcement and emotion regulation
Gaming may temporarily reduce loneliness, anxiety, or dysphoria, and the experience of relief can reinforce future play. Removing that familiar strategy can leave the original distress exposed. A clinician can explore the difference between symptoms newly produced by gaming deprivation and symptoms that were already present but were being managed through play. Both matter for the person's functioning, and they lead to somewhat different treatment priorities.
Habit, identity, and social connection
Daily gaming can become embedded in sleep schedules, peer relationships, friendships, and a sense of competence. Abrupt reduction may disrupt important rituals and social commitments. Someone who loses access to an online guild may experience genuine interpersonal loss. Someone engaged in an organized competitive team may feel disappointed by missing a practice event. These are credible psychological effects that need contextual understanding, not automatic pathologizing.
Executive control, impulsivity, and expectations
People differ in how easily they delay gratification, redirect attention, and tolerate uncertainty. Difficulty shifting attention away from gaming may co-occur with executive-function difficulties, sleep deprivation, or other psychiatric symptoms. Studies that rely on single questionnaires cannot determine whether these vulnerabilities caused gaming problems, emerged alongside them, or share a common risk factor. Expectations also shape interpretation: a person told that a break will cause withdrawal might label ordinary irritability as a clinical symptom. Robust experiments need comparison groups and explicit controls for these factors.
Measuring withdrawal and its validity
From a single symptom item to multidimensional scales
Older Internet Gaming Disorder scales often use one question about sadness, irritability, or restlessness when play is unavailable. A single item is efficient but can collapse very different experiences. It may also fail to establish whether a symptom followed the break, appeared before it, or was caused by an unrelated stressor. Asking whether a person has ever been upset about being unable to game is a substantially broader measure than diagnosing impairment.
In 2026, Starzec and colleagues published development and psychometric testing of the Gaming Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire. The researchers began with a broader item pool, then analyzed separate exploratory and confirmatory samples of 480 and 565 adult gamers, respectively. Their final work supported a multidimensional structure involving motivational and cognitive, affective, and physical domains. This is important progress in measurement, though the samples were predominantly Polish and recruited through gaming-related online channels. Cross-sectional factor analysis tests structure and correlations; it cannot independently show that gaming cessation causes the measured feelings or that the scale has a validated clinical diagnostic cutoff. Starzec et al., 2026.
In the confirmation sample, the withdrawal score correlated with a gaming symptom scale and with depression and anxiety measures. The correlations support convergent associations while also emphasizing why differential assessment matters: overlapping emotional distress is not a specific marker of gaming causation. Future validation must test temporal response during observed restriction, test-retest properties, meaningful clinical thresholds, and performance in diverse languages and patient populations. Starzec et al., 2026.
Questions worth asking during assessment
A useful assessment records the last gaming session, usual game type and schedule, duration and voluntariness of the interruption, timing of mood changes, their severity, and whether they improve with alternative activities or social contact. It asks about urges, persistent thoughts, school or work functioning, family circumstances, sleep, medications and substances, and coexisting symptoms. Clinicians should consider the player's own account as well as a developmentally appropriate collateral history, while respecting the privacy and autonomy of the person assessed.
A diary or repeated daily observations can clarify whether irritability consistently follows missed gaming opportunities or also occurs on days when gaming continues. A short assessment period should not be mistaken for a validated withdrawal diagnostic test. A person whose anger occurs only during a dispute about rules may need a different intervention from someone with pervasive distress, progressive loss of control, and declining functioning across multiple settings.
Differential diagnosis and coexisting conditions
Depression and anxiety
Depressive disorders and anxiety disorders can involve restlessness, irritability, low mood, sleep disturbance, poor concentration, and reduced interest in activities. These experiences can persist independently of gaming and can also affect the reasons people play. Assessment should establish the timeline, severity, impairment, and presence of symptoms beyond gaming restrictions. Screening questionnaires can guide further evaluation but do not settle causality or diagnosis.
ADHD, autism, and developmental context
Attention-regulation difficulties, intense interests, social routines, and sensory preferences may affect gaming patterns and reactions to interrupted plans. A person's neurodevelopmental profile cannot be inferred from how much they play or how strongly they react to a game ending. Neurodevelopmental assessment belongs to its own diagnostic pathway, while the gaming-specific assessment examines control, consequences, routines, and impairment. Families should distinguish a child's disappointment about a changed plan from a sustained clinical pattern.
Sleep and circadian disruption
Late-night gaming can coexist with insufficient sleep, irregular schedules, and daytime irritability. During a reduction in play, someone may also change wake times or caffeine habits, creating a misleading impression of withdrawal. Tracking sleep timing and restoration can make symptom interpretation substantially more accurate. Persistent insomnia, marked fatigue, or other physical complaints deserve their own assessment.
Substance use, manic symptoms, and safety
Nicotine, caffeine, alcohol, stimulant exposure, and prescribed medications can influence agitation, sleep, appetite, and mood. Sudden changes in these exposures can produce symptoms that should not be assigned to gaming without assessment. Distinctive signs of mania, psychosis, severe depression, self-harm thoughts, or acute medical illness require clinical attention based on the underlying concern. Gaming withdrawal is not an adequate explanation for a dangerous change in mental state.
Adolescents, adults, and family contexts
For adolescents, restrictions are often imposed by parents or schools and may coincide with developmental efforts toward autonomy. Arguments over access can intensify distress even when gaming itself is not clinically disordered. A family assessment can explore routines, age-appropriate boundaries, emotional support, school engagement, and the child's relationships inside and outside games. The adolescent controlled study supports caution about both generalized claims of severe withdrawal and simplistic claims that abstinence alone resolves problems. Evans et al., 2018.
Adults face different patterns, including work fatigue, social disconnection, escapism, and role obligations. Help-seeking samples can differ substantially from general population gamers; people presenting for treatment are often more distressed and motivated to change. A 2026 qualitative study of 30 adult men who discussed recovery from problematic gaming emphasized the role of social and environmental circumstances. Its interview design offers contextual insight, not a population estimate or randomized evidence of what causes recovery. Gelūnas, 2026.
Cultural norms, access to social activities, disability accommodation, income, and family relationships influence how a gaming break is experienced. Researchers should avoid building universal thresholds from predominantly young convenience samples. A clinically useful account includes the meaning of play to the person and the practical consequences of changing it.
What helps when a gaming break causes distress?
Collaborative change and gradual adjustment
For people without significant impairment, a planned reduction, consistent sleep schedule, time for exercise or other interests, and deliberate social contact may be sufficient. The goal is to determine how gaming fits into a sustainable routine. Some prefer a defined temporary break; others benefit from decreasing playtime while preserving valued social relationships. A useful plan anticipates high-risk periods and replaces important functions of gaming rather than treating the disappearance of screen time as the entire intervention.
Managing urges and the emotional response
An urge to play is an experience that can be observed without immediately acting on it. Practical techniques include identifying cues, scheduling alternative activities in advance, delaying automatic responses to notifications, reducing unwanted reminders, and using brief grounding or emotion-regulation exercises. These are reasonable behavioral strategies, though gaming-withdrawal-specific randomized trials have not established one optimal protocol. The relevant clinical outcomes are relief, improved choice, and restored functioning.
Psychological care when gaming becomes impairing
When impaired control, escalating priority of gaming, and continuing despite substantial consequences are present, a mental-health professional can assess gaming disorder and related conditions. Cognitive behavioral methods may address gaming expectations, avoidance, coping, triggers, and relapse risks. Family involvement can be useful when relationships and developmental context are central. A 2025 treatment meta-analysis identified improvements in gaming-disorder outcomes across controlled studies while calling for larger and longer trials, including better assessment of comorbidity and durability. These broader treatment findings do not validate a medication or a dedicated withdrawal-management protocol. Harpas et al., 2025.
When to seek additional support
Clinical consultation is appropriate when attempts to reduce gaming repeatedly coincide with marked distress, aggressive conflict, sustained sleep problems, declining school or work performance, loss of relationships, or inability to regain control. Persistent low mood or severe anxiety should be assessed on their own merits. If a person expresses suicidal intent, self-harm thoughts, or an immediate risk of violence, seek urgent local emergency or crisis care. Those situations require a direct safety assessment rather than assumptions about the cause of distress.
Clinical and research limitations
The strongest finding is that some players report aversive experiences around gaming interruption; the weaker claim is that all such experiences represent a distinctive, biologically defined withdrawal syndrome. Measurement often relies on retrospective self-report, selection of highly involved gamers, and questionnaires that embed the word "withdrawal" before validating what it measures. Small experimental samples, short abstinence periods, weak control conditions, and mixed online versus offline gaming formats limit generalization. Kaptsis et al., 2016; Starzec et al., 2024.
The current research also has a classification problem: many studies measure the DSM research construct, while the WHO's recognized gaming disorder category uses different defining features. Scales that correlate with proposed Internet Gaming Disorder counts do not automatically demonstrate diagnostic validity for ICD-11 gaming disorder. Correlation cannot establish temporal sequence; short voluntary abstinence cannot reproduce all clinical situations; and a validated factor structure cannot substitute for criterion validity against independent clinical assessment. Starzec et al., 2026.
Future inquiry needs adequately powered experimental comparisons, clinical interviews that identify the specific experience being missed, preregistered repeated measurement, diverse samples, assessment of baseline sleep and psychopathology, and follow-up long enough to test persistence. It should distinguish subjective distress from clinically meaningful impairment and investigate whether new measures predict independent outcomes beyond ordinary mood and craving scores.
Frequently asked questions
Can video games cause withdrawal symptoms?
Some players report irritability, restlessness, anxiety, boredom, craving, or persistent thoughts about gaming when play stops. Controlled evidence suggests that the experience varies and may sometimes decline quickly. Current research supports studying these reactions, while the causal mechanisms and characteristic clinical syndrome remain incompletely established. Kaptsis et al., 2016; Starzec et al., 2024.
How long do gaming withdrawal symptoms last?
There is no evidence-based universal duration. Some short experimental studies have observed changes across the first day or several days of abstinence, but those limited samples do not establish a standard timetable for every player. Persistent or severe symptoms need evaluation for multiple possible causes rather than reliance on a countdown. Kaptsis et al., 2016.
Does irritability when the game is removed mean addiction?
No diagnostic conclusion follows from irritability alone. The key clinical questions concern persistent control problems, gaming's priority over other activities, continuation despite consequences, and significant functional impairment. The circumstances of restriction, prior mental health, and ordinary frustration also need consideration. World Health Organization.
Is withdrawal required for an ICD-11 gaming disorder diagnosis?
No. The WHO's ICD-11 definition focuses on impaired control, increasing priority, continuation despite negative consequences, and significant impairment. Withdrawal appears among proposed DSM-5-TR Internet Gaming Disorder research symptoms but is not a defining ICD-11 requirement. World Health Organization; American Psychiatric Association.
Is stopping video games abruptly dangerous?
Research has not established a characteristic life-threatening physiological gaming withdrawal syndrome comparable to withdrawal from certain substances. Yet severe emotional symptoms, a mental-health crisis, interpersonal violence, or relevant substance withdrawal can require urgent care regardless of the gaming context. Individual risk assessment matters more than assuming that all distress has the same source.
Should parents enforce a complete gaming detox?
A blanket clinical requirement for complete abstinence is not established by the evidence. Collaborative boundaries, predictable routines, sleep, family communication, and attention to why the child plays are reasonable starting points. When gaming causes serious impairment or conflict, professional assessment can determine a proportionate plan. Evans et al., 2018.
Related Articles
Cluster Gambling, Gaming and Behavioral Addictions — Scientific framework for gaming and gambling disorders, behavioral addiction mechanisms, research evidence, and care.
Gaming Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment — ICD-11 diagnostic framework, functional impairment, and evidence-based treatment considerations.
Gaming Disorder Screening: Questionnaires and Clinical Assessment — How screening measures differ from a comprehensive diagnostic interview.
Heavy Gaming vs Gaming Disorder: Warning Signs and Functional Impairment — Why high involvement is not a substitute for evaluating clinical impairment.
How to Reduce Problematic Gaming: Practical Changes and When to Seek Help — Practical options for regulating play and recognizing when professional help is appropriate.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Gaming Disorder — Evidence, clinical applications, and limitations of cognitive behavioral approaches.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (n.d.). Internet gaming: DSM-5-TR proposed Internet Gaming Disorder and research status. Official APA information.
Bočanová, J. (2024). Withdrawal, withdrawal symptoms, and craving in gaming disorder: Systematic review. Adiktologie, 24(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.35198/01-2024-001-0002.
Evans, C., King, D. L., and Delfabbro, P. H. (2018). Effect of brief gaming abstinence on withdrawal in adolescent at-risk daily gamers: A randomized controlled study. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.024.
Gelūnas, B. (2026). Social and environmental factors in recovery from problematic gaming: A qualitative study of 30 narrative interviews with adult men. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-026-00611-9.
Harpas, I., Stevens, M., Radunz, M., Williamson, P., Hamamura, T., Svendsen, O., and King, D. L. (2025). Treatment of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 354, 116783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116783.
Kaptsis, D., King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., and Gradisar, M. (2016). Trajectories of abstinence-induced Internet gaming withdrawal symptoms: A prospective pilot study. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 4, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2016.06.002.
Kaptsis, D., King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., and Gradisar, M. (2016). Withdrawal symptoms in Internet gaming disorder: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 43, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.11.006.
King, D. L., Adair, C., Saunders, J. B., and Delfabbro, P. H. (2018). Clinical predictors of gaming abstinence in help-seeking adult problematic gamers. Psychiatry Research, 261, 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.008.
King, D. L., Kaptsis, D., Delfabbro, P. H., and Gradisar, M. (2016). Craving for Internet games? Withdrawal symptoms from an 84-hour abstinence from massively multiplayer online gaming. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.020.
King, D. L., Kaptsis, D., Delfabbro, P. H., and Gradisar, M. (2017). Effectiveness of brief abstinence for modifying problematic Internet gaming cognitions and behaviors. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(12), 1573–1585. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22460.
Starzec, S., Starosta, J., Zajas, A., Kiszka, P., Śpiewak, S., and Strojny, P. (2024). Scoping review of withdrawal's role in contemporary gaming disorder research: Conceptualizations and operationalizations. Clinical Psychology Review, 114, 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102478.
Starzec, S., Śpiewak, S., Starosta, J., and Strojny, P. (2026). Conceptualization and measurement of withdrawal symptoms in gaming disorder and development and psychometric validation of the Gaming Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Serious Games, 14, e81407. https://doi.org/10.2196/81407.
World Health Organization. (2020). Addictive behaviours: Gaming disorder. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/addictive-behaviours-gaming-disorder.