Sports betting addiction describes a pattern of wagering on sporting events in which a person repeatedly loses control of betting, continues despite meaningful harm, and struggles to change the behavior. Clinically, a person whose sports wagering meets diagnostic criteria is assessed for gambling disorder. Sports betting addiction is a familiar descriptive phrase, rather than a separate diagnosis for a particular betting product. Warning signs include chasing losses, betting more than intended, secrecy, escalating financial exposure, preoccupation with odds, and damage to work, sleep, relationships, or mental health. Effective help can involve reducing immediate access to betting, a comprehensive clinical assessment, gambling-specific cognitive behavioral therapy, and practical financial and social support. American Psychiatric Association, 2023; NICE, 2025.
Sports wagering is embedded in contemporary sports media, mobile platforms, and promotional ecosystems. An ordinary fan can become a frequent bettor through repeated exposure to odds, in-play markets, promotional credits, and immediate payment systems. These features create numerous opportunities to wager during a single game. Risk depends on the interaction of individual vulnerability, product features, accessibility, and life circumstances; frequency or knowledge of sports alone cannot determine whether someone has a disorder. A systematic review of 54 studies identifies meaningful associations with impulsivity, co-occurring difficulties, and certain patterns of wagering, while emphasizing that most studies were cross-sectional and unable to demonstrate causal direction. Valenciano-Mendoza et al., 2023.
What Is Sports Betting Addiction?
Sports betting means staking money or another item of value on a sporting result or component of an event in expectation of a possible payout. It includes pregame wagers, wagers made while play is underway, parlays, prop bets, and rapid micro-bets on discrete occurrences. The psychological subject here is sports wagering as a gambling activity, whether placed in a retail venue, through a mobile application, or through another channel. Daily fantasy contests and prediction markets may share certain risk mechanisms, but their legal and product structures differ across jurisdictions and require careful classification.
Gambling disorder is a recognized mental disorder under DSM-5-TR and ICD-11. Neither classification establishes a separate diagnosis called sports betting addiction. Clinical criteria concern the persistent pattern of gambling behavior, impaired control, and adverse consequences. Someone can experience gambling-related harms before reaching a diagnostic threshold. Another person may place frequent low-stakes bets without meeting disorder criteria, though exposure can still carry financial and other risks. American Psychiatric Association, 2023; World Health Organization, 2024.
The distinction between risky gambling, problem gambling, and gambling disorder is practical. A person who occasionally overspends after a sporting loss may need preventive support and financial boundaries. A person who repeatedly borrows money, conceals bets, attempts unsuccessfully to stop, and experiences substantial impairment requires structured evaluation. The seriousness of current harm deserves attention regardless of whether a clinician ultimately assigns a diagnosis.
Why Sports Betting Is Psychologically Distinctive
Sport provides a narrative that gambling products can attach to: team loyalty, rivalries, live suspense, perceived expert knowledge, and social rituals. Bettors may feel that familiar players, statistical models, or years of watching a league give them control over inherently uncertain outcomes. Relevant skill in interpreting information does not eliminate randomness, bookmaker margins, inaccurate prediction, or the behavioral effects of repeated wagering. A correct prediction is compatible with a financially losing betting strategy; the price or odds matter as well as the chosen outcome.
Sports books can also convert an event that would otherwise have a beginning and an end into a succession of betting decisions. Pregame bets may be followed by in-play bets, cash-out decisions, same-game parlays, and last-minute attempts to recover a loss. Studies of these features report associations between impulsive in-play wagering and problem-gambling severity, but directionality remains uncertain. People already at higher risk may be especially attracted to rapid formats. Killick and Griffiths, 2019.
Symptoms and Warning Signs
The most useful warning signs concern control, psychological priority, concealment, and consequences. Any single behavior can occur without a disorder; persistent patterns across contexts and the accumulating impact on daily life are more informative. A clinical interview examines the person's full gambling history, the function gambling serves, and the extent of related harm. NICE, 2025.
Losing Control of Betting
Someone repeatedly resolves to bet only on a weekend game and then places unplanned wagers throughout the week. Attempts to stop or reduce betting last for a short time before another deposit, account, or betting application becomes the route back in. The person may increase stakes or spend longer following markets than intended. These are stronger signals when they continue despite explicit goals, promises, or observed consequences.
Chasing Losses and Escalating Financial Exposure
Loss chasing involves betting again to recover money already lost. In sports betting, a failed wager can lead to a second bet during the same game, then a late-game bet, then wagering on an unfamiliar match. Some people also chase an earlier large win, trying to recreate a distinctive experience. Escalating bet size, overdrafts, cash advances, concealed credit obligations, unpaid bills, and borrowing for deposits can indicate substantial harm. The clinical concern is the pattern and consequences, not the presence of one unsuccessful prediction.
Preoccupation, Irritability, and Secrecy
Betting can occupy thoughts before, during, and after sports events. A person may continuously monitor scores and odds, check promotions at work, or spend nights researching bets while neglecting sleep. Irritability during efforts to stop may occur; it should be assessed as part of the overall pattern rather than treated as an independently confirmed withdrawal syndrome. Concealed transactions, deleted app histories, and misleading explanations for missing money can signal that gambling has become difficult to discuss openly.
Relationship, Work, and Mental Health Changes
Potential consequences include lateness, reduced performance, arguments about money, withdrawal from previously valued activities, disrupted sleep, anxiety after losses, and a sense that enjoyment of sport depends on placing a bet. Some individuals report shame and hopelessness; these experiences can intensify after rapid financial losses. Financial harm may also affect partners, children, and other people whose resources are entangled with the bettor's decisions. World Health Organization, 2024.
Clinical Diagnosis: Gambling Disorder Rather Than a Separate Sports Betting Disorder
DSM-5-TR places gambling disorder among substance-related and addictive disorders. The framework assesses nine possible manifestations, including increasing amounts wagered, unsuccessful control efforts, preoccupation, gambling when distressed, chasing losses, concealment, jeopardizing major relationships or opportunities, and relying on others for financial rescue. A diagnosis generally requires at least four criteria within a twelve-month period, clinically significant impairment or distress, and evaluation of whether the behavior is better explained by a manic episode. The criteria are applied by trained professionals to the whole pattern of gambling, not mechanically to a single betting app. American Psychiatric Association, 2023.
ICD-11 describes gambling disorder as a persistent or recurrent pattern with impaired control over gambling, increasing priority given to gambling, and continuation or escalation despite adverse consequences, leading to significant impairment. Its clinical guidance considers duration and severity; a pattern is commonly evident over at least twelve months, although sufficiently severe presentations may justify a shorter period. People can experience harmful gambling without meeting all the conditions for gambling disorder. No person should be diagnosed from a short online checklist alone. World Health Organization, Addictive Behaviour.
The clinician also considers bipolar mania or hypomania, medication-related impulse-control problems, substance use, ADHD symptoms, depression, trauma, financial stress, and other circumstances. High-risk decisions confined to a mood episode may require a different primary diagnostic formulation from a persistent gambling disorder. Overlap and comorbidity are possible, so careful assessment avoids forcing a single explanation onto a complex history. NICE, 2025.
Screening Measures and Their Limits
The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) and South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) are established tools for identifying gambling problems and evaluating severity. They provide useful standardized information about behavior and consequences; scores alone are not formal psychiatric diagnoses. A large psychometric evaluation of the PGSI supported its general measurement structure while highlighting reduced sensitivity to some lower-severity difficulties. Context matters when applying scores across countries, age groups, and types of gambling. Currie et al., 2013; NICE, 2025.
An assessment of sports betting should ask specifically about the number of betting accounts, deposit and loss patterns, in-play versus pregame activity, exposure to inducements, borrowing, hidden transactions, other gambling products, and the impact of watching sport. Clinicians should distinguish the person's actual losses from self-reported amounts staked and from an operator's presentation of winnings and bonuses. Gambling-related harms can change quickly even when an individual does not report betting every day.
Why Sports Betting Can Become Difficult to Control
Reinforcement and Variable Outcomes
Winning bets can reinforce behavior through money, excitement, anticipation, and a temporary sense of mastery. Variable outcomes keep future rewards uncertain and create repeated opportunities for hopeful prediction. A loss may sometimes increase motivation to keep playing if the bettor believes the next wager will restore a previous balance. Reward-learning mechanisms can help explain persistence, although they do not specify that every sports bettor develops addiction or establish a uniform brain response in every person.
Perceived Skill, Illusion of Control, and Confirmation Bias
Sports knowledge often makes betting feel different from games presented openly as chance. Bettors may correctly remember matches in which research was rewarded while neglecting the many occasions when confident predictions failed. Selective attention to memorable wins and the belief that a streak is due to reverse can distort decisions. Even a genuine ability to forecast some outcomes does not establish an economic advantage over offered odds and fees. The clinically relevant question is whether beliefs support uncontrolled wagering in the face of mounting costs.
In-Play Betting and Shortened Decision Cycles
Live betting compresses time between observing an event, interpreting changing odds, and committing money. An individual may move from watching a game to evaluating dozens of betting opportunities. The cash-out option can create another decision point, making it possible to close one position and immediately open another. Micro-betting increases the density of possible wagers. A scoping review concluded that associations between in-play gambling and gambling problems warrant concern, while available cross-sectional evidence does not settle whether these formats cause later disorder. Killick and Griffiths, 2019.
Parlays, Promotions, and the Salience of Large Payouts
Parlays combine multiple selections into a single wager and offer conspicuous potential payouts when all required results occur. The probability of every leg succeeding falls as independent requirements are added, and attractive headline returns can obscure the likelihood of loss and embedded pricing. Bonuses, limited-time offers, and risk-reduction language can make additional wagering feel inexpensive even when promotions carry conditions. Understanding the actual costs and requirements is important, particularly when the person feels compelled to deposit just to avoid missing an offer.
Emotion Regulation and Negative Urgency
Stress, boredom, loneliness, anger after a loss, and excitement after a win can all become cues for wagering. Some people bet to feel connected to a sporting event; others use it to escape distress or recover a temporary sense of control. Negative urgency refers to a tendency to act impulsively during unpleasant emotional states. The sports-betting systematic review identified associations involving impulsivity and negative urgency, alongside multiple methodological limitations. Such associations identify useful assessment domains rather than fixed personality destinies. Valenciano-Mendoza et al., 2023.
Advertising, Sports Culture, and Commercial Exposure
Betting products are promoted through sports sponsorship, live broadcasts, apps, social media, affiliates, and direct offers. Advertising can make gambling seem continuous with ordinary fandom: a game is simultaneously entertainment, a statistical puzzle, and an invitation to stake money. The risks also affect people who have never placed a bet, including young viewers who learn to associate sport with odds and promotional language. The World Health Organization identifies commercialization, digital availability, and marketing as central public-health concerns. World Health Organization, 2024.
A 2025 systematic review of 22 quantitative studies found that exposure to sports-related gambling advertising was associated with gambling frequency, spending, intentions, unplanned betting, and some riskier betting patterns. Effects were reported as potentially stronger among people already at higher risk. However, many included studies were observational, relied on heterogeneous measures, and were conducted in Australia; the review did not yield a single pooled causal effect estimate. The evidence supports treating advertising exposure as a meaningful risk environment, with the precise causal magnitude still uncertain. McGrane et al., 2025.
Research among 567 sports bettors aged 18 to 24 identified links between marketing responsiveness, in-play betting, certain impulsivity measures, and higher PGSI scores. Because the design was observational and participants were recruited from an online panel of active bettors, the findings cannot establish that advertising caused disorder in those individuals or describe all young adults. They nevertheless reinforce the importance of asking about inducements and ad-triggered betting in clinical conversations. Hing et al., 2024.
Who Faces Elevated Risk?
No age, gender, income group, sporting interest, or personality profile establishes an individual diagnosis. Systematic studies find correlations with male gender in several samples, impulsivity, gambling across multiple products, and co-occurring mental-health or substance-use difficulties. The research is disproportionately based on specific countries and self-selected samples, so these group associations must not become stereotypes or substitutes for assessment. Valenciano-Mendoza et al., 2023.
Young adults may encounter heavy marketing, social normalization, peer wagering, and limited experience of debt or financial recovery. Adolescents require attention to gambling exposure and local age restrictions; adults must not infer that a minor's participation is harmless because bets are small. Conversely, the presence of a gambling disorder is possible in older adults, women, and people without the demographic features most commonly represented in sports-betting samples. Anyone experiencing loss of control or harm merits the same seriousness.
Depression, anxiety, sleep disruption, ADHD, bipolar symptoms, and substance-use conditions can complicate assessment and recovery. Gambling may precede some difficulties, follow others, or interact with them over time. Cross-sectional associations do not determine which came first. Clinicians can address co-occurring conditions alongside gambling treatment instead of treating every symptom as a consequence of betting. NICE, 2025.
Financial, Family, and Social Consequences
Financial harm extends beyond net betting losses. It can include overdraft charges, high-interest debt, missed rent, unpaid household expenses, damage to shared credit, and pressure to borrow from family. Small wagers placed many times can accumulate into major losses, while occasional large bets can create acute crises. Account statements, banking records, and a clear list of liabilities can help clarify the situation when estimates of expenditure are unreliable.
Partners and relatives may experience uncertainty, arguments, depleted savings, and broken agreements about shared money. Children can be affected indirectly through stress and reduced household resources. Some relationships face coercion, intimidation, or other safeguarding concerns, requiring independent support for affected family members. International public-health guidance treats the wellbeing of those around the gambler as a significant part of gambling-related harm. World Health Organization, 2024.
Sports betting can also change a person's relationship with the game. A previously enjoyable match becomes an exhausting sequence of odds checks and emotional reactions tied to the wager. This narrowing of interests may contribute to social withdrawal, poor sleep, and tension in friendships. Recovery can involve gradually rebuilding ways of engaging with sport, or deciding to take a break from betting-focused sports media while the person develops more stable routines.
Getting Help: A Practical First Response
People do not need to wait for an official diagnosis or a catastrophic financial loss before seeking support. Concern about control, concealment, stress, or spending is a sufficient reason to have a confidential conversation with a health professional or gambling-help service. NICE recommends initial help, access to specialist treatment where indicated, and attention to urgent risks. NICE, 2025.
Reduce Immediate Access and Exposure
A first step is to create distance between an urge and the ability to place a wager. Depending on the setting, that may involve deactivating gambling accounts, enrolling in self-exclusion programs that cover relevant operators, removing betting applications, blocking gambling sites, disabling promotional notifications, and avoiding betting-related media for a period. Self-exclusion systems vary in coverage and enforcement, so people should check which operators and channels are actually included. These measures work best as part of broader psychological and social support rather than as a complete treatment by themselves.
Protect Essential Finances
Separating essential bills from discretionary spending can reduce immediate vulnerability. A person might arrange for rent and other necessities to be paid promptly, review recent transactions, seek a reputable nonprofit debt counselor, and ask a trusted supporter to help establish agreed financial boundaries. A plan should respect autonomy, safety, and the rights of everyone who shares money. Borrowing to recoup betting losses, relying on another promotion, or making a final supposedly certain wager generally deepens the exposure the person is trying to escape.
Seek Assessment and Support
A primary-care clinician, licensed mental-health professional, or specialized gambling service can assess the pattern of betting and recommend an appropriate level of care. Assessment can include a validated screening instrument, suicide-risk questions, other mental-health symptoms, substance use, financial distress, and family circumstances. People who fear stigma may prefer starting with a confidential helpline or self-referral route. NICE, 2025.
In the United States, the National Council on Problem Gambling identifies 1-800-MY-RESET as its national problem gambling helpline number, with call and text options and links to state-level assistance. Service details can change, so its official website is the reliable place to confirm available channels: National Council on Problem Gambling. Elsewhere, local health services, regulated gambling support organizations, or a clinician can help identify services appropriate to the jurisdiction.
Evidence-Based Treatment and Recovery
Gambling-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) targets gambling-related beliefs, habitual situations, emotional triggers, avoidance, and decision-making patterns. Gambling-specific CBT may involve identifying the exact sequence leading to a bet, evaluating probabilities and expected costs, challenging loss-chasing beliefs, developing alternative coping behaviors, and establishing relapse-response plans. NICE recommends group gambling-specific CBT, with individual CBT when group treatment is unsuitable or declined. NICE, 2025.
An umbrella review drawing on multiple meta-analyses supports reductions in gambling severity, frequency, and intensity at the end of treatment. A separate synthesis of randomized studies also found improvements in short-term outcomes but raised concerns about heterogeneity, publication bias, and inconsistent follow-up effects. The evidence therefore supports offering CBT while assessing progress over time and adapting care when symptoms or harms persist. Pfund et al., 2023; Pfund et al., 2023, randomized-trial synthesis.
Motivational Approaches, Family Work, and Ongoing Support
Motivational interviewing can help someone who is uncertain about stopping betting clarify what matters, explore ambivalence, and prepare for change. Support groups, peers with lived experience, trusted family members, and practical financial services may assist recovery, though these resources differ in scope and formal evidence. Family members can receive support even when the bettor is not ready for treatment. Goals should be specific enough to monitor, yet flexible enough to address changing risk and circumstances. NICE, 2025.
Medication: Specialist Decisions and Evidence Limits
There is no universally indicated medication that uniquely treats sports betting addiction. Some clinicians consider pharmacotherapy for gambling disorder, particularly when psychological treatment has not achieved the desired outcome or repeated relapses have occurred. NICE allows specialist consideration of naltrexone under specified conditions and emphasizes qualified supervision; this is an off-label use in the cited guidance. Medication choice also requires attention to health history, contraindications, co-occurring disorders, and local regulatory conditions. It is inappropriate to begin or stop prescription treatment based on an online article. NICE, 2025.
Relapse Prevention for Sports-Specific Triggers
A relapse plan can identify high-risk moments: game days, tournament finals, payday, alcohol use while watching sport, messages from betting contacts, bonus offers, and sudden exposure to odds. The person can rehearse alternative actions, arrange support, preserve self-exclusion, and plan how to respond rapidly if a bet occurs. A lapse should trigger reassessment and renewed safeguards, especially when losses create acute distress. Recovery includes restored functioning, safer relationships with money, and improved capacity to choose activities freely—not solely a count of days since the last wager. NICE, 2025.
Suicide Risk and Urgent Safety
Gambling-related debt, exposure of concealed losses, separation, shame, and perceived hopelessness can coincide with suicidal thoughts. An observational meta-epidemiological review published in 2026 found elevated associations between gambling disorder and suicidal thoughts, attempts, and mortality, while results differed by design and geography. These are population-level associations and cannot predict the outcome for a particular bettor. NICE specifically recommends asking about suicidal thoughts and intent when gambling harms are present and responding urgently to substantial or immediate risk. Wang et al., 2026; NICE, 2025.
If someone may act on suicidal thoughts or cannot remain safe, contact local emergency services or an emergency department immediately, involve a trusted person when safe, and reduce access to means of self-harm. A crisis plan and prompt professional evaluation are especially important after a severe loss or a relapse. In the United States, the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline is available through 988lifeline.org. Support for urgent emotional safety takes priority over efforts to solve every financial problem at once.
Research Quality: What the Evidence Can and Cannot Establish
The evidence for sports betting has expanded rapidly, but important questions remain. A major 2023 systematic review located 54 studies and found that all included studies used cross-sectional designs. Such studies show who tends to report betting and related problems at the same time; they cannot prove that a particular product feature, personality trait, or advertisement caused a later disorder. Self-report and nonprobability online samples also influence generalizability. Valenciano-Mendoza et al., 2023.
The sports-advertising evidence contains consistent associations but heterogeneous measures, populations, and designs. Commercial platform data may provide detailed transactions while missing gambling across other operators and the lived impact on households. Treatment trials more directly support intervention efficacy, yet varying outcome definitions and limited long-term follow-up constrain broad claims about permanent recovery. Strong conclusions therefore distinguish observed association, plausible mechanism, intervention effect, and demonstrated causal risk reduction. McGrane et al., 2025; Pfund et al., 2023.
Public-health research also addresses system-level exposure: availability, advertising, product intensity, self-exclusion infrastructure, and support accessibility. Individual therapy can reduce harm for people seeking treatment, while changes in the gambling environment can influence how many people encounter repeated, high-intensity betting opportunities. These levels of prevention are complementary and should be assessed with transparent methods, attention to conflicts of interest, and outcomes that include financial and family wellbeing. World Health Organization, 2024.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is sports betting addiction a recognized diagnosis?
A harmful pattern of sports wagering can meet diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder, which is recognized in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11. Sports betting addiction is commonly used to describe the activity involved, but the formal clinical diagnosis evaluates gambling behavior overall and its resulting impairment. A qualified professional determines whether criteria are met. American Psychiatric Association, 2023.
Can a person be addicted to sports betting without betting every day?
Yes. Frequency alone is insufficient to determine severity. Intermittent but uncontrolled betting, particularly when associated with severe losses, failed attempts to stop, or serious family and work consequences, can warrant assessment. Conversely, daily attention to odds does not establish diagnosis without evaluating control and clinically significant distress or impairment.
Why are live bets and parlays concerning?
Live betting permits repeated decisions throughout a match, while parlays may highlight the possibility of large payouts despite a low probability of all selections succeeding. These characteristics can increase opportunities for impulsive betting and loss chasing. Observational research associates some rapid and in-play formats with greater harm, though it does not conclusively establish causation. Killick and Griffiths, 2019.
Do betting apps cause gambling disorder?
Apps make gambling accessible and can deliver frequent prompts, instant transactions, and personalized offers. Studies identify risk associations with certain product and marketing exposures. Individual causation depends on many interacting factors and requires stronger longitudinal or experimental evidence than most existing sports-betting studies provide. Product design and environmental risks nonetheless deserve clinical and public-health attention.
What if someone refuses to admit that betting has become harmful?
A family member can describe concrete effects on bills, trust, or emotional wellbeing, set safety-oriented boundaries around shared resources, and seek confidential guidance for themselves. Arguments over labels can distract from measurable harms. Services for affected others can provide support independently of the bettor's readiness to seek treatment. Where intimidation, financial coercion, or suicidal crisis is present, immediate safety needs should guide the response. NICE, 2025.
Can people recover and enjoy sports again?
Recovery is possible. Some people choose to continue watching sports with different routines and without betting; others benefit from a temporary break from games, gambling commentary, or wagering-related social situations. Gambling-specific therapy, reduced access to betting, ongoing support, and relapse planning help make that choice more sustainable. The appropriate plan reflects individual risks and goals. NICE, 2025.
Related Articles
Cluster Gambling, Gaming and Behavioral Addictions — the scientific overview of gambling disorder, gaming disorder, mechanisms, assessment, harms, and treatment.
Neuroticism and Addiction: Substance Use, Negative Affect, and Risk — related research on negative affect and vulnerability across addictive behaviors.
Online Gambling Addiction: Risks, Signs, and Recovery — Explain how rapid digital access and online gambling products affect risk, detection, treatment access, and recovery supports.
Gambling Advertising and Betting Promotions: Psychological Effects — Review how gambling marketing, inducements, and sports sponsorship relate to attitudes, betting behavior, and harms.
Gambling Debt and Financial Harm: Mental Health and Recovery — Explore financial stress, debt, concealment, relationship harm, and practical support as part of gambling disorder recovery.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2023). Gambling disorder. APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/gambling-disorder
Currie, S. R., et al. (2013). Validation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch modelling. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1392
Hing, N., et al. (2024). Examining the role of sports betting marketing in youth problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39046580/
Killick, E. A., and Griffiths, M. D. (2019). In-play sports betting: A scoping study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9896-6
McGrane, E., et al. (2025). What is the impact of sports-related gambling advertising on gambling behaviour? A systematic review. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16761
National Council on Problem Gambling. (2026). National Council on Problem Gambling adopts 1-800-MY-RESET as new National Problem Gambling Helpline number. https://www.ncpgambling.org/news/1-800-my-reset-announcement/
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2025). Gambling-related harms: Identification, assessment and management (NG248). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng248/chapter/recommendations
Pfund, R. A., et al. (2023). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for gambling harm: Umbrella review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102336
Pfund, R. A., et al. (2023). Effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques for problem gambling and gambling disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16221
Valenciano-Mendoza, E., et al. (2023). Clinical correlates of sports betting: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-023-10196-0
Wang, L., et al. (2026). Gambling disorder and suicide risk: A meta-epidemiology study. Journal of Psychiatric Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.10.067
World Health Organization. (2024). Gambling. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/gambling
World Health Organization. (n.d.). Addictive behaviour. https://www.who.int/health-topics/addictive-behaviour