A social anxiety test can help identify a pattern of fear of negative evaluation, avoidance of social situations, and related physical or cognitive symptoms. A score cannot by itself diagnose social anxiety disorder. Online pages labeled “social anxiety test” may use a validated screening measure, a symptom-severity scale, a research questionnaire, a checklist based loosely on diagnostic criteria, or a custom quiz with no published validation. Those are not interchangeable.
The clinical distinction matters. The National Institute of Mental Health describes social anxiety disorder as strong fear or anxiety in situations where a person may be judged or scrutinized, with avoidance or extreme discomfort, persistence for at least six months, and interference with daily life. A questionnaire can sample parts of that pattern, but diagnosis requires an assessment of duration, impairment, context, differential diagnosis, and the meaning of the feared situations.
Current guidance supports using validated measures as aids to identification and assessment. NICE social anxiety disorder guidance recommends the three-item Mini-SPIN or two brief identification questions when social anxiety disorder is suspected in adults, and says that a Mini-SPIN score of 6 or more should lead to a comprehensive assessment rather than be treated as a diagnosis. NICE also names the SPIN and Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) as validated measures that can inform assessment and treatment monitoring.
This page owns the search intent behind “social anxiety test,” “social anxiety quiz,” “social anxiety screening,” “social phobia test,” and “do I have social anxiety?” It explains what validated measures can and cannot tell you, why cutoffs vary across populations, how false positives and false negatives happen, and what a clinician adds after a screening result. For the broader screening framework, see Anxiety Screening vs Diagnosis: Why a Questionnaire Is Not a Clinical Diagnosis.
Social Anxiety Test: The Short Answer
There is no single online score that confirms or rules out social anxiety disorder. A validated test can estimate the presence or severity of social-anxiety symptoms and can indicate whether a fuller assessment may be useful. The meaning of the result depends on the specific instrument, the population in which it was validated, the cutoff chosen, the time period covered, and whether the goal is case-finding, symptom measurement, or monitoring change.
A positive screen means “this pattern deserves a closer look,” not “you have the disorder.” A negative screen means “the questionnaire did not cross its chosen threshold,” not “social anxiety disorder is impossible.” This is the same basic distinction that applies to a general anxiety test: screening changes the probability that a condition is present; it does not replace clinical assessment.
What Social Anxiety Disorder Actually Requires
Social anxiety disorder is organized around fear of scrutiny or negative evaluation in social situations. The feared outcome may involve embarrassment, rejection, humiliation, appearing visibly anxious, offending someone, being seen as incompetent, or otherwise being negatively evaluated. People may avoid the situation, endure it with intense anxiety, use safety behaviors to get through it, or restrict work, education, relationships, travel, eating, speaking, dating, meetings, presentations, or other activities.
The diagnostic threshold is not simply “feeling nervous around people.” NIMH emphasizes persistence and meaningful interference. NICE likewise instructs clinicians to assess fear, avoidance, distress, and functional impairment, and to obtain a detailed account of feared situations, anticipated consequences, anxiety symptoms, self-image, attention, and safety-seeking behaviors. The diagnostic question is therefore about a structured pattern, not a single symptom count.
This also separates a clinical disorder from ordinary shyness, temporary self-consciousness, normal performance nerves, broad worry, panic-focused fear, and social difficulties that arise for other reasons. Those neighboring patterns can overlap with social anxiety, and a screening score often cannot determine which explanation fits best.
What a Social Anxiety Test Can Measure
Fear of negative evaluation
Many social-anxiety measures ask about fear in situations where attention, performance, conversation, unfamiliar people, authority figures, eating or writing in public, or other forms of scrutiny may occur. The key construct is not simply the presence of other people; it is the anticipated social evaluation attached to the situation.
Avoidance
Avoidance is clinically important because a person can have substantial social anxiety even when outward distress looks limited. Someone may prevent anxiety by declining invitations, choosing remote communication, avoiding speaking, taking routes that reduce encounters, or arranging life so feared situations rarely occur. A questionnaire that asks only how anxious a person felt during situations they actually entered may underestimate a highly avoidant presentation.
Physical and cognitive symptoms
Validated measures may sample blushing, sweating, trembling, palpitations, tension, mental blankness, self-focused attention, anticipatory worry, or post-event rumination. These symptoms can support the social-anxiety picture, but they are not specific to social anxiety disorder. Physical symptoms can have other psychological or medical explanations, and a questionnaire cannot determine causation from symptom overlap.
Functional impact and symptom burden
Some measures are stronger at measuring symptom burden than life impact. A clinically useful assessment asks what the fear changes: attendance, education, work, relationships, daily tasks, health care, eating, speaking, driving, or participation. Two people with similar questionnaire totals can have very different levels of impairment because their environments, coping strategies, avoidance patterns, and required social demands differ.
The Main Validated Social Anxiety Measures
Mini-SPIN
The Mini-Social Phobia Inventory is a three-item self-report screen derived from the longer SPIN. Its purpose is rapid case-finding. In the original Connor et al. validation study, a cutoff of 6 or more produced sensitivity of 88.7% and specificity of 90.0% in a managed-care sample. The positive predictive value was 52.5% and the negative predictive value was 98.5% in that study. Those predictive values belong to that study population and do not travel unchanged to every website, clinic, age group, language, or prevalence setting.
NICE uses the same threshold operationally: a score of 6 or more on the Mini-SPIN is a reason to refer for or conduct a comprehensive assessment. That wording is crucial. The threshold is an identification threshold, not a diagnostic boundary.
Later evidence supports the Mini-SPIN as a brief adult screening tool. Seeley-Wait, Abbott, and Rapee found good discrimination between adults with and without social anxiety disorder in a clinical sample. Wiltink and colleagues also supported the German Mini-SPIN in clinical and community samples. At the same time, newer evidence illustrates why a familiar cutoff should never be treated as universal.
SPIN
The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) is a 17-item self-report measure covering fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms. In the original Connor et al. psychometric study, a score of 19 distinguished social-phobia participants from combined comparison groups, with sensitivity of 0.725 and specificity of 0.843 in that study. The instrument also showed test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity, and sensitivity to symptom change.
A number such as 19 is therefore best understood as a historically studied screening cutoff, not as a universal diagnostic threshold. The original samples, diagnostic terminology, recruitment methods, language, and comparison groups matter. Online sites often convert the total score into severity bands; those bands can be useful descriptively, but they should not be presented as separate diagnostic categories.
A particularly useful reminder comes from a 2026 preliminary German study of 65 non-treatment-seeking psychology students assessed with a DSM-5 structured interview. With the established German SPIN cutoff of 25, sensitivity was 80% and specificity 69%, with an area under the curve of 0.71. The Mini-SPIN performed less strongly in this small sample. The study is preliminary, but it demonstrates a general principle: screening performance can change with population, language, setting, and sampling.
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale and LSAS-SR
The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale assesses fear or anxiety and avoidance across a range of social interaction and performance situations. It exists in clinician-administered and self-report forms. Fresco and colleagues found that the self-report form compared well with the clinician-administered version, and Baker and colleagues reported good psychometric properties and sensitivity to treatment change for LSAS-SR.
In a 2009 screening study involving 291 clinician-assessed participants with social anxiety disorder and 53 control participants, an LSAS-SR cutoff of 30 provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for identifying social anxiety disorder. A cutoff of 60 was also reported for the DSM-IV-era “generalized subtype.” That second threshold should not be converted into a current DSM-5-TR subtype rule: the old generalized subtype and current diagnostic specification are not the same classification structure.
The practical lesson is that LSAS scores can be useful for identifying a social-anxiety pattern and quantifying severity, especially in clinical and research contexts. They still require interpretation in context. A high LSAS score does not tell you why someone is distressed in social situations, and it does not by itself establish the diagnosis.
APA DSM-5-TR Severity Measure for Social Anxiety Disorder
The American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TR assessment-measures page includes a disorder-specific Severity Measure for Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)—Adult and a version for ages 11–17. The adult official measure contains 10 items about the previous seven days, each scored from 0 to 4, yielding a raw total from 0 to 40 and an average item score from 0 to 4.
This instrument is easy to mislabel online. APA describes it as a severity measure for people with a diagnosis or clinically significant symptoms and for follow-up monitoring. APA also states that its assessment measures should enhance clinical decision-making rather than serve as the sole basis for a clinical diagnosis. It is therefore not the same thing as a stand-alone public screening test designed to answer “Do I have social anxiety disorder?”
Measures for children and adolescents
Assessment in children and adolescents requires age-appropriate tools and developmental context. NICE recommends that a comprehensive assessment involve the young person and, where possible, a parent, carer, or other knowledgeable adult. It lists options such as the LSAS child version, the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory for Children, SPIN or LSAS for young people, and broader anxiety measures such as SCARED when clinically indicated.
Recent research continues to evaluate brief tools in youth rather than assuming adult psychometrics apply unchanged. For example, Hathway and colleagues studied Mini-SPIN performance in a treatment-seeking sample of children and caregivers. A youth screening result should be interpreted alongside developmental history, school functioning, family observations, communication patterns, neurodevelopmental context, and other anxiety symptoms.
What a Positive Social Anxiety Screen Can Tell You
A positive result can tell you that your responses resemble a pattern the instrument was designed to detect. Depending on the measure, that may mean elevated fear of evaluation, avoidance, physiological arousal, or social-anxiety severity. It can also give you a structured vocabulary for describing what happens, which situations are hardest, and how much the pattern interferes with life.
A positive screen can be useful for deciding whether to seek an assessment, preparing for a clinical conversation, and tracking change over time. In treatment settings, NICE explicitly recommends routine outcome measures such as SPIN or LSAS so the person and clinician can review progress. The value here comes from repeated measurement within a clear clinical purpose, not from turning each score into a fresh diagnosis.
A positive result can also reveal a mismatch worth exploring. For example, someone may score highly because they avoid social situations due to fear of panic symptoms, sensory overload, past humiliation, speech or communication difficulties, depression, or another condition. The screen has detected distress; it has not necessarily identified its cause.
What a Social Anxiety Test Cannot Tell You
It cannot make a formal diagnosis
Diagnosis integrates symptom pattern, duration, severity, impairment, developmental and medical context, differential diagnosis, and clinical judgment. A self-report score is one data source. The APA explicitly states that its measures should not be the sole basis for diagnosis, and NICE sends people with positive identification results to comprehensive assessment.
It cannot rule the disorder out
Any screen can miss cases. Someone may underreport symptoms, interpret items differently, have a presentation poorly sampled by the questionnaire, experience anxiety mainly in a narrow set of high-stakes situations, or have arranged life around avoidance so the recent symptom window looks quiet. A low score does not erase persistent, impairing fear if the lived pattern remains clinically significant.
It cannot tell you the cause
A high social-anxiety score does not establish that the symptoms come from social anxiety disorder. Fear of judgment can coexist with generalized anxiety, panic disorder, depression, substance use, autism, ADHD, avoidant personality traits, body-image concerns, trauma-related symptoms, communication difficulties, or medical problems. A questionnaire typically cannot perform the full differential assessment needed to separate those possibilities.
It cannot choose treatment for you
Screening instruments do not establish which treatment is indicated, whether a medication is appropriate, or whether a specific psychotherapy fits an individual case. Treatment decisions depend on diagnosis, severity, preferences, age, comorbidity, previous treatment, medical history, and other clinical factors.
It cannot convert physical symptoms into proof of anxiety
Sweating, trembling, dizziness, palpitations, shortness of breath, gastrointestinal discomfort, or faintness can occur during anxiety, but symptom overlap alone does not prove anxiety is the cause. New, severe, unexplained, or medically concerning physical symptoms deserve appropriate medical evaluation rather than being attributed to social anxiety because they appeared on a questionnaire.
How Accurate Are Social Anxiety Tests?
Sensitivity and specificity answer different questions
Sensitivity is the proportion of people with the target condition who screen positive under the study definition. Specificity is the proportion without the condition who screen negative. A cutoff can increase one while decreasing the other. That tradeoff is one reason there is no magic score that works equally well in every setting.
The original Mini-SPIN study reported high sensitivity and specificity at a cutoff of 6, while the original SPIN study found a useful cutoff of 19 in its samples. Those numbers demonstrate that the instruments can discriminate groups under specified study conditions. They do not mean an individual score has the same meaning in every population.
Positive predictive value depends on who is being tested
The Mini-SPIN's original study is a good illustration: despite strong sensitivity and specificity, the positive predictive value was 52.5% in the managed-care sample. Predictive value depends strongly on how common the disorder is in the population being screened and on how people were selected. The same test can produce a different proportion of true positives in a specialty anxiety clinic, a college sample, primary care, or the general internet population.
A cutoff belongs to an instrument, population, and purpose
A cutoff should be read with its evidence base attached. The SPIN threshold used in one clinical validation, the Mini-SPIN threshold used for case identification, and an LSAS cutoff derived from a case-control sample are not interchangeable. Translation and cultural adaptation can also alter performance. The 2026 student study further shows that even an established cutoff can yield different sensitivity and specificity in a new population.
A broad review of social-anxiety scales concluded that adult and youth measurement includes diagnostic instruments, symptom scales, and measures of maintaining factors, each with methodological issues that affect interpretation. The evidence supports measurement; it does not support treating every score as a diagnosis.
Why False Positives Happen
Shyness and normal self-consciousness
A shy person may endorse discomfort, avoidance, or fear of embarrassment without meeting the clinical threshold for social anxiety disorder. The key questions are persistence, proportionality, distress, impairment, and the broader pattern. A screening measure deliberately casts a wider net than a diagnostic interview, so some false positives are expected.
Generalized anxiety and broad worry
Someone with generalized anxiety disorder may worry extensively about social outcomes as one part of a much broader pattern of difficult-to-control worry. A social-anxiety measure may detect the social portion without determining whether the organizing problem is social evaluation fear, generalized worry, both, or something else. For that distinction, see GAD vs Social Anxiety Disorder: Broad Worry vs Social Evaluation Fear.
Panic-focused fear
Panic symptoms can occur in social situations, but panic disorder is organized around recurrent unexpected panic attacks and concern or behavioral change related to additional attacks. Social anxiety disorder is organized around social scrutiny and negative evaluation. If a questionnaire asks about bodily arousal without clarifying the feared consequence, the same symptom can contribute to different clinical pictures. See Panic Disorder vs Social Anxiety Disorder: Panic Fear vs Social Evaluation Fear.
Autism, ADHD, and other neurodevelopmental contexts
Autistic people and people with ADHD can also experience social anxiety disorder, and the conditions can coexist. At the same time, social withdrawal, difficulty in conversation, reduced eye contact, missed social cues, sensory stress, executive-function demands, rejection experiences, or communication differences can influence questionnaire responses. NICE therefore tells clinicians assessing young people to consider neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism and ADHD as part of a comprehensive assessment. A social-anxiety score cannot establish or exclude a neurodevelopmental diagnosis.
Avoidant personality features, depression, substance use, and other conditions
NICE specifically advises clinicians to be aware of comorbid avoidant personality disorder, alcohol or substance misuse, mood disorders, other anxiety disorders, psychosis, and autism when assessing possible social anxiety disorder in adults. Screening tools usually do not have enough information to decide whether one condition, several co-occurring conditions, or a different explanation best accounts for the result.
Language, culture, and social context
The meaning of eye contact, public speaking, deference, self-presentation, unfamiliar interaction, and embarrassment varies across cultural and social contexts. Translation quality and local norms also matter. A validated English-language cutoff should not automatically be assumed to perform identically in another language or cultural setting without supporting evidence.
Why False Negatives Happen
False negatives can occur because a person minimizes symptoms, answers according to an unusually calm week, has learned to avoid nearly all triggering situations, experiences a narrow performance-related pattern that is not well sampled, or interprets items differently from the validation sample. Some people also judge themselves by whether they completed a task rather than by the amount of distress, preparation, safety behavior, or recovery time the task required.
A negative result is therefore most informative when it agrees with the wider picture: little persistent fear of scrutiny, little avoidance, and little impairment. When a person has a low score but substantial restriction, distress, or persistent fear, the mismatch itself is useful information for assessment.
Validated Screen vs Custom Internet Quiz
A validated measure has published psychometric evidence
A validated instrument has been studied against external criteria or established measures, with evidence about reliability, validity, discrimination, or sensitivity to change. That does not make it perfect or universally diagnostic. It means there is a transparent evidence base for what the score is intended to represent.
A custom quiz may be educational without being validated
A website can create sensible questions about social discomfort and still have no evidence that its total score identifies social anxiety disorder. An original quiz should be described as an educational self-reflection tool unless its scoring system has been validated. Borrowing the language of “clinical,” “diagnostic,” or “research-based” does not create validation.
Look for the instrument name and source
A high-quality test page should tell you which instrument it uses, who developed it, the time frame, how scoring works, where the cutoff came from, which population was studied, and what the result cannot establish. If a site presents a numerical result without identifying the questionnaire or its evidence base, the number has much less clinical meaning.
How to Interpret Your Result
If the score is above a screening threshold
Treat the result as a reason to examine the pattern more closely. Ask which situations you fear, what you expect other people to notice or think, what you avoid, how long the pattern has been present, and what it is costing you in daily life. If the fear is persistent or impairing, a professional assessment can clarify whether social anxiety disorder or another explanation fits.
If the score is below the threshold
A low score can be reassuring when it matches your functioning and experience. It does not overrule persistent impairment. If you repeatedly avoid essential social or performance situations, organize life around fear of judgment, or experience significant distress despite a low score, discuss the discrepancy with a qualified clinician.
If different tests give different answers
Different tools measure different constructs and use different cutoffs. SPIN, Mini-SPIN, LSAS, and APA's severity measure are not four interchangeable versions of the same test. Before comparing numbers, check the instrument, scoring range, purpose, time frame, language, and population for which the cutoff was studied.
If the result changes over time
Change can be meaningful when the same validated measure is repeated under reasonably comparable conditions. It may reflect improvement, worsening, a change in exposure to feared situations, treatment response, or ordinary variation. A single week of lower symptoms after avoiding most social demands does not necessarily mean the underlying problem has resolved.
What a Clinical Assessment Adds
A clinical assessment asks questions a questionnaire cannot. NICE recommends assessing fear, avoidance, distress, functional impairment, feared outcomes, anxiety symptoms, self-view, self-image, safety behaviors, and attentional focus. It also calls for consideration of comorbid conditions and the broader social, occupational, and physical-health context.
NIMH similarly describes diagnosis as a process that explores when symptoms began, how long they have lasted, how often they occur, and how they affect daily life. A clinician can also ask follow-up questions when an answer is ambiguous, distinguish fear of evaluation from fear of panic or escape, review developmental history, and decide whether medical or substance-related factors need attention.
For a fuller description of the diagnostic process across anxiety presentations, see How Is Anxiety Diagnosed? Assessment, History, and Differential Diagnosis.
Social Anxiety Tests in Children and Adolescents
Children and adolescents may show social anxiety through avoidance of speaking, answering questions, eating in front of others, group work, school attendance, sports, performances, parties, peer interaction, or other situations involving scrutiny. Developmental stage matters because ordinary social self-consciousness changes with age and because parents, teachers, and the young person may observe different parts of the pattern.
NICE recommends comprehensive assessment when identification questions suggest possible social anxiety disorder and says formal measures can aid that assessment. The guidance names child- and youth-specific social-anxiety instruments and broader anxiety tools, and it advises clinicians to assess speech, language, communication, neurodevelopmental conditions, physical health, educational functioning, and family context.
An online adult cutoff should therefore not be transplanted into a child without evidence. Even when a youth measure is validated, the result remains part of assessment rather than a stand-alone diagnosis.
Can You Use a Social Anxiety Test to Track Treatment?
Yes, when the instrument is appropriate and there is a defined monitoring purpose. NICE recommends routine sessional outcome measures such as SPIN or LSAS in treatment for adults with social anxiety disorder. Repeated scores can make change visible and can help a person and clinician discuss whether fear, avoidance, or functioning is improving.
Monitoring is different from repeatedly checking yourself for certainty. There is no universal evidence-based schedule for unsupervised retesting. A practical approach is to use the same measure at planned intervals, interpret changes alongside actual behavior and functioning, and avoid treating small score fluctuations as proof that a diagnosis has appeared or disappeared.
When to Seek a Professional Assessment
Consider an assessment when fear of judgment or embarrassment is persistent, when you avoid important situations, when social or performance demands cause substantial distress, or when the pattern interferes with school, work, relationships, health care, or ordinary daily activities. A screening result can strengthen that reason, but you do not need a high score to justify asking for help.
If the main concern is uncertainty about whether symptoms reflect an anxiety disorder at all, the broader Anxiety Disorders: Symptoms, Types, Diagnosis, and Treatment overview explains the distinction between normal anxiety and clinical disorders. If you are deciding what a questionnaire result means, Anxiety Screening vs Diagnosis explains the general screening framework in more detail.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an online social anxiety test diagnose social anxiety disorder?
No. A validated online questionnaire can screen for symptoms or estimate severity, but diagnosis requires a clinical assessment of the complete pattern, including duration, impairment, context, and differential diagnosis.
What is the best social anxiety test?
There is no single best instrument for every purpose. The Mini-SPIN is very brief and suited to initial case identification; the SPIN provides a broader self-report profile of fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms; the LSAS examines fear and avoidance across social and performance situations; and the APA DSM-5-TR measure is designed for disorder-specific severity monitoring in people with a diagnosis or clinically significant symptoms.
Does a Mini-SPIN score of 6 mean I have social anxiety disorder?
No. NICE uses 6 or more as a threshold for further assessment, and the original validation study found useful screening performance at that cutoff. It is a case-identification threshold, not a diagnostic boundary.
Does a SPIN score of 19 mean I have social anxiety disorder?
No. The original SPIN study found that 19 distinguished social-phobia participants from controls in its validation samples. That is evidence for screening utility, not a rule that every person at 19 or above has the disorder or everyone below 19 does not.
What does an LSAS score of 30 mean?
A 2009 study found that 30 on the LSAS self-report version provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for identifying social anxiety disorder in that sample. It should be interpreted as a studied screening cutoff in a particular population, not as a universal diagnostic line.
Can a shy person score high on a social anxiety test?
Yes. Shyness and social anxiety overlap in some experiences, and a broad screen is expected to identify some people who do not meet full diagnostic criteria. Persistence, impairment, avoidance, proportionality, and the complete clinical context help distinguish ordinary temperament from a disorder.
Can autistic people have social anxiety disorder?
Yes. Autism and social anxiety disorder can coexist. Social communication differences, sensory stress, masking demands, or prior negative social experiences can also influence responses to social-anxiety questions. A social-anxiety questionnaire cannot diagnose autism or determine by itself which condition explains a particular social difficulty.
Can panic symptoms make a social anxiety test score higher?
Yes. Some instruments include physiological symptoms, and panic-like arousal can occur in social situations. The diagnostic distinction depends on what organizes the fear: negative social evaluation, recurrent unexpected panic, escape or help concerns, or another mechanism. A questionnaire score alone may not resolve that distinction.
Should I retake the test until I feel certain?
Repeated testing is most useful when it has a defined monitoring purpose, such as tracking treatment or planned symptom change. Retaking a questionnaire repeatedly to obtain certainty can produce noise rather than clarity. If uncertainty itself is persistent or impairing, a clinical assessment gives more information than another score.
What should I bring to an appointment after a positive screen?
Bring the instrument name, your score, the date, and a few concrete examples of feared or avoided situations. Note what you expected others to think, what you did to stay safe or escape, how long the pattern has been present, and how it affects work, school, relationships, or daily activities. That information is usually more useful than the score alone.
Related Articles
Social Anxiety Disorder: Symptoms, Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Anxiety Disorders: Symptoms, Types, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Medication for Social Anxiety Disorder: Options, Benefits, and Risks
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: What It Measures and Its Limitations
How Is Anxiety Diagnosed? Assessment, History, and Differential Diagnosis
Anxiety Test: What Screening Can and Cannot Tell You
Anxiety Screening vs Diagnosis: Why a Questionnaire Is Not a Clinical Diagnosis
GAD vs Social Anxiety Disorder: Broad Worry vs Social Evaluation Fear
Panic Disorder vs Social Anxiety Disorder: Panic Fear vs Social Evaluation Fear
References
American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5-TR Online Assessment Measures.
American Psychiatric Association. Severity Measure for Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)—Adult.
Baker SL, Heinrichs N, Kim H-J, Hofmann SG. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2002;40(6):701–715. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00060-2.
Connor KM, Davidson JRT, Churchill LE, Sherwood A, Foa E, Weisler RH. Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). New self-rating scale. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;176:379–386. doi:10.1192/bjp.176.4.379.
Connor KM, Kobak KA, Churchill LE, Katzelnick D, Davidson JRT. Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety. 2001;14(2):137–140. doi:10.1002/da.1055.
Fresco DM, Coles ME, Heimberg RG, et al. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychological Medicine. 2001;31(6):1025–1035. doi:10.1017/S0033291701004056.
Hathway T, McLellan LF, Dear BF, et al. The psychometric properties of the Mini Social Phobia Inventory in a treatment seeking sample of children and their caregivers. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 2025;54(2):171–189. doi:10.1080/16506073.2024.2397673.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Social anxiety disorder: recognition, assessment and treatment. Clinical guideline CG159.
National Institute of Mental Health. Social Anxiety Disorder: What You Need to Know.
Rytwinski NK, Fresco DM, Heimberg RG, et al. Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Depression and Anxiety. 2009;26(1):34–38. doi:10.1002/da.20503.
Schmidt-Peter T, et al. Preliminary evaluation of the German SPIN and Mini-SPIN for screening social anxiety disorder in university students. BMC Psychology. 2026. doi:10.1186/s40359-026-05119-8.
Seeley-Wait E, Abbott MJ, Rapee RM. Psychometric properties of the mini-social phobia inventory. Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2009;11(5):231–236. doi:10.4088/PCC.07m00576.
Wiltink J, Kliem S, Michal M, et al. Mini-social phobia inventory (Mini-SPIN): psychometric properties and population based norms of the German version. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:377. doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1545-2.
Wong QJJ, Gregory B, McLellan LF. A Review of Scales to Measure Social Anxiety Disorder in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2016;18(4):38. doi:10.1007/s11920-016-0677-2.