Slot machine gambling can become harmful because modern machines combine repeated monetary risk with fast, emotionally salient feedback, unpredictable rewards, and designs that can make losing outcomes feel encouraging. For some people, these features sustain gambling beyond planned limits, especially when financial stress, powerful urges, or attempts to recover losses develop. Researchers distinguish the product's measurable features from the person's clinical condition: playing slots is a gambling activity, gambling-related harm can occur at any level of involvement, and gambling disorder is diagnosed only when established clinical requirements are met. The clearest evidence concerns near misses, losses disguised as wins, speed of play, and the way these characteristics shape attention and persistence. Barton et al., 2017; World Health Organization, 2024.
Slot machines also illustrate why a gambling product must be evaluated as a system. A person experiences the monetary outcome, the machine's sounds and images, opportunities to wager again, the surrounding environment, and their own emotional state together. Experiments identify specific short-term effects of this system; observational research connects electronic gambling machine exposure and expenditure with problems at the population level. Neither line of evidence permits a simple prediction that any individual will develop a disorder. Risk is shaped by product characteristics, accessibility, life circumstances, prior problems, and repeated exposure. Barton et al., 2017; World Health Organization, 2024.
What Slot Machines Are and How Their Design Matters
From mechanical reels to electronic gambling machines
A slot machine is a wagering device in which the player stakes money or credits on outcomes determined mainly by chance and receives a payout when specified combinations or game events occur. Contemporary products include physical casino slots, video slots with numerous paylines, electronic gaming machines in gambling venues, and online slot games. The rules, permitted designs, maximum stakes, theoretical payouts, bonus features, and player protections vary by product and jurisdiction. Many electronic machines can produce frequent events, immediate feedback, and numerous apparent successes within a continuous session. Some products add autoplay, bonus rounds, or features that reduce the felt separation between bets. Newall et al., 2024.
The term electronic gaming machine, or EGM, is common in scientific and policy literature, particularly in Australia. In the United States, slot machines are the familiar example. Neither name implies video gaming disorder. Real-money wagering with a prospect of monetary loss belongs to gambling; commercial video games without staking on uncertain monetary outcomes involve different activities and clinical questions. The present article concerns the machine as a gambling product and the particular pathways by which its design can contribute to harm.
What a spin actually returns
The important accounting unit is the net result of the full wager. When a player stakes $2 and a game returns $0.60, the net result is a loss of $1.40. A return of some credits can feel rewarding, but it does not convert that wager into a profit. The same distinction applies to multiline wagers: winnings on one line can coexist with a larger loss across the entire spin. Laboratory research shows that positive sounds and animations associated with partial returns can obscure this basic financial comparison. Dixon et al., 2010.
Return to player, often abbreviated RTP, describes a game's theoretical proportion of stakes returned over a very large number of plays under specified conditions. A hypothetical 94% RTP means an expected average return of $94 for every $100 wagered over the modeled long run, not a promise that any session will return $94. Individual sessions can involve large gains or losses. The complementary 6% is a theoretical house advantage in this example, not a guaranteed loss in every short session. RTP, volatility, paylines, and bonus mechanisms are separate properties. A posted percentage is meaningful only for the exact game configuration to which it applies.
Why Unpredictable Rewards Sustain Play
Reward learning and variable outcomes
Slot machine play presents repeated opportunities for reinforcement. An occasional payout may increase the salience of gambling cues, while uncertainty directs attention toward the next possible event. Learning models explain why intermittent monetary reinforcement can sustain behavior even when losses accumulate overall. The player's subjective excitement and the game's expected financial value follow different processes. An exciting outcome, including a partial return, can strengthen the urge to continue without improving the next wager's mathematical value. The scientific account involves associative learning, anticipation, attention, appraisal, and motivation; it cannot be reduced to a single neurotransmitter. Barton et al., 2017.
In independently randomized slot outcomes, a sequence of losses does not make a win due, and a recent payout does not establish a winning streak. The belief that outcomes must compensate for previous results is the gambler's fallacy. A player may also develop rituals or treat timing as skilled control over results. Some products include genuine choices about stake size or participation, but these decisions ordinarily affect exposure and cost rather than granting control over the underlying randomized outcome. Research into stop buttons has found that the option to halt a display can foster mistaken perceptions of skill among some players. Near-Misses and Stop Buttons in Slot Machine Play, 2017.
Rapid betting and cumulative expenditure
Fast play creates many decisions and potentially many wagers in a short period. A small stake per spin can accumulate into a substantial monetary exposure when the number of spins rises. For illustration, 300 wagers of $1 create $300 in total stakes, even when some winnings are recycled; that is not the same as saying the player necessarily loses $300. Measuring only the original amount deposited can obscure total wagering volume, and counting only gross payouts can obscure the actual net balance.
A critical review of speed-of-play studies found consistent preferences for faster games and evidence that faster conditions can increase excitement. Results for actual persistence, betting, and difficulty stopping were less uniform, with differences in experimental designs and participant groups. Thus the association between speed and harm is a plausible and supported design concern, while the size of a general causal effect for every machine and population remains uncertain. The Impact of Speed of Play in Gambling, 2017.
Continuous sessions, attention, and time perception
An uninterrupted sequence of audiovisual outcomes can absorb attention, narrowing focus on the next event and weakening awareness of elapsed time or mounting losses. Some researchers describe a highly absorbing experience during multiline slot play using the term dark flow. In a study connecting these experiences to depression-related variables, associations between immersion, gambling motives, and emotional symptoms were examined rather than an established diagnostic syndrome identified. Absorption is not a disorder in itself; its practical importance lies in whether it interferes with stopping, monitoring finances, and responding to other responsibilities. Dixon et al., 2018.
Near Misses: When a Loss Looks Close to a Win
Defining a near miss
A near miss is a losing outcome that visually resembles a winning combination: for example, two matching jackpot symbols appear and a third lands just outside the paying position. It is a full loss under the game's rules. The resemblance to a win may create an impression of progress or proximity even when the relevant random event has no memory. Certain game configurations can generate such appearances more often than a player intuitively expects, though mechanisms differ across products and regulatory settings.
A systematic review of 51 human experiments reported that near misses often increase motivation to continue and reliably elicit physiological arousal, while their effects on emotions and subsequent betting vary across methods. Skin conductance and activation in reward-related networks indicate an engaging, sometimes frustrating response, rather than proof that a given individual is becoming addicted. Barton et al., 2017.
What recent online experiments add
A series of preregistered 2024 online slot-simulator experiments found that near misses increased ratings of motivation, shortened the interval before another spin, and increased subsequent bet size relative to more distant losing outcomes in the study conditions. These findings strengthen evidence for short-term behavioral responses and show that the mechanism can operate in digital environments. The experiments do not establish the incidence of gambling disorder years later or the impact of every commercial slot design. The Near-Miss Effect in Online Slot Machine Gambling, 2024.
Near-miss research also contains important counterevidence. A review and experimental investigation using resistance-to-extinction procedures found no support for the proposed effect in its tested animal and human paradigms. This does not erase the behavioral and self-report effects observed with other measures; it shows why an arousal finding, a faster next spin, and durable reinforcement cannot be treated as interchangeable outcomes. Product geometry, exposure, participant selection, and outcome measurement change the observed effect. The Near-Miss Effect in Slot Machines, 2019.
Losses Disguised as Wins: The Distinctive Multiline Risk
How a net loss can look like a successful spin
A loss disguised as a win, abbreviated LDW in gambling research, occurs when a multiline spin returns some credits but fewer than the total credits staked. The machine may celebrate the result with flashing symbols and an upbeat sound. A player who bet $1.50 and receives $0.35 has lost $1.15, even if the display announces a payout. Unlike a near miss, an LDW includes an actual partial monetary return; its misleading character comes from the treatment of that net loss as a win. Dixon et al., 2010.
In a laboratory study of novice players, LDWs produced skin conductance responses comparable to genuine wins and greater than ordinary no-return losses. A subsequent experiment showed that participants exposed to conventional celebratory feedback frequently classified LDWs as wins and overestimated their actual winning frequency; changing the sound feedback improved recognition of losses. These studies establish measurable effects of presentation, while the magnitude and consequences depend on the chosen game and sample. Dixon et al., 2010; Dixon et al., 2015.
Multiline play and perceived success
Playing more lines can yield a larger number of small credit returns while producing more LDWs. Experimental studies have shown that players may overestimate genuine winning spins in multiline conditions and experience them as especially absorbing. However, game mathematics, stake allocation, and short-run volatility also change with the specific configuration; multiline play should not be summarized as always producing a greater cash loss on a fixed set of wagers. The reliable distinction is between frequency of positively presented outcomes and actual net monetary gains. Dixon et al., 2014; Harrigan et al., 2015.
An experiment with experienced gamblers randomized to games with different LDW frequencies found that gambling persistence during a subsequent losing streak varied by both LDW condition and participant problem-gambling status. More LDWs did not simply produce more persistence in every group. This interaction illustrates why the evidence supports feature-specific risk analysis rather than a universal claim that any visual reward inevitably creates addiction. Gambling Despite Financial Loss, 2018.
Sounds, Visual Feedback, and the Sense of Control
Sound and color help establish the subjective meaning of an outcome. Celebratory feedback can draw attention to small returns, while a silent or neutral representation can make net losses easier to interpret. The role of sound in experimental misclassification matters because it is an alterable feature of gambling products, not an immutable property of human judgment. The specific intervention tested in laboratory simulations should nevertheless be distinguished from evidence that a commercial regulation improves long-term public health outcomes. Dixon et al., 2015.
Stop buttons and other player-facing controls can foster an impression of influence over chance outcomes. In one study involving 132 casino-recruited gamblers, a minority endorsed erroneous cognitions about the stop button or near misses, and the button changed some physiological and behavioral responses. The result identifies a cognitive risk pathway in particular product designs; it does not imply that every control is intentionally misleading or that all users misunderstand the game's mechanics. Near-Misses and Stop Buttons, 2017.
Loss Chasing and the Escalation of Risk
Loss chasing means continuing or intensifying gambling in an effort to recover money already lost. Slot machines create rapid opportunities for the player to convert a financial setback into a new wager without leaving the activity. A person may start with recreational intentions, reinterpret a recent near miss as encouragement, then continue to recover losses and exceed previously chosen limits. These steps are possible behavioral pathways, not a fixed progression experienced by every player.
A critical point is that money previously lost is unavailable regardless of the next spin. Increasing the next wager changes the amount exposed to risk; it does not turn past losses into a statistical reason that a win should occur. Recognition of this process is relevant to assessment because chasing losses is one of the clinical symptoms considered in DSM gambling-disorder assessment, alongside loss of control, preoccupation, concealment, and important harms. The broad mechanisms of reward expectation and chasing are treated in the independently published Gambling Reward Psychology: Near Misses, Loss Chasing, and Illusion of Control article.
When Slot Gambling Becomes Problem Gambling or Gambling Disorder
Harmful gambling can occur without a disorder
Gambling harm includes money needed for housing or essentials being spent on slots, accumulating debt, neglecting work or family responsibilities, relationship conflict, anxiety, sleep disruption, and mental distress. These problems can be significant before a diagnostic threshold is crossed. The World Health Organization emphasizes that gambling harm exists below the threshold for gambling disorder, and the 2025 NICE guideline recommends responses proportionate to the person's circumstances and assessed needs. World Health Organization, 2024; NICE NG248, 2025.
Problem gambling is often used as a broad public-health, screening, or research term. The Problem Gambling Severity Index, or PGSI, estimates risk and harms through a self-report questionnaire; a category on a screen is not a psychiatric diagnosis. Screening helps identify people who may benefit from a professional conversation. Clinical assessment considers the full history, current impact, alternative explanations, and care needs. The related Gambling Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment article addresses diagnostic assessment in depth.
Recognized diagnostic classification
Gambling disorder is an established clinical diagnosis. In ICD-11 it belongs to disorders due to addictive behaviors and involves impaired control, increasing priority given to gambling, continued behavior despite negative consequences, and significant impairment. ICD-11 can distinguish predominantly online and predominantly offline gambling. The DSM-5-TR places gambling disorder among substance-related and addictive disorders and uses a symptom-based diagnostic framework over a specified period. The classification is based on the overall behavior and consequences, not on a single machine type or number of spins. World Health Organization, 2024.
A person can play frequently and have no diagnosable gambling disorder; another can experience immediate and serious financial harm after a relatively brief pattern. Frequency, spending, and a preferred gambling product inform assessment, but clinical diagnosis requires an integrated evaluation. Symptoms of mania, medication-related impulse-control changes, intoxication, depression, anxiety, or cognitive impairment can affect how gambling behavior is understood and managed. NICE specifically recommends reviewing whether certain medications, including dopamine-related treatments, may contribute to gambling harms. NICE NG248, 2025.
Who May Be More Vulnerable?
Risk emerges from an interaction between product exposure and individual or contextual factors. Relevant contributors can include prior gambling problems, financial insecurity, stress, emotional distress, social isolation, co-occurring substance use, and difficulties with impulse regulation. The same machine can be experienced differently by different people, and individuals can change their patterns over time. Clinical evaluations should also inquire about ADHD-related symptoms, mood symptoms, medication exposure, and other disorders when the history makes them relevant. Such associations require attention to confounding and bidirectional effects: for example, anxiety can precede harmful gambling, follow financial losses, or both. NICE NG248, 2025.
Slot-machine vulnerability has also been studied through motives such as excitement seeking, escape from unpleasant emotions, and immersion. Depression-related correlations with absorption during multiline play are informative, but they do not establish that depression mechanically causes slot-machine disorder, or that an immersive gambling session is itself a psychiatric condition. Population-based findings depend on who participates, where gambling products are located, and whether harm is measured by diagnosis, PGSI scores, spending, or clinical service use. Dixon et al., 2018.
What Population Studies Can and Cannot Tell Us
Electronic gambling machines have been repeatedly implicated in gambling-related expenditure and public-health concerns. A meta-regression of Australian prevalence estimates reported a positive association between the proportion of household income lost on EGMs and problem-gambling prevalence, while also identifying major heterogeneity and measurement limits. A community-level correlation does not establish that the machine caused the disorder in any specific person: availability, venue concentration, socioeconomic stress, measurement practices, and differences in gambling participation can contribute. Australian EGM Prevalence Meta-Regression, 2017.
The causal question is also complicated by selection: people who already have difficulties controlling gambling may spend more time with certain machines. Cross-sectional studies cannot resolve whether exposure came first. Longitudinal natural experiments and regulatory evaluations are useful when available, but they too must handle simultaneous policy changes and unequal exposures. A sound article therefore describes electronic gaming machines as a product category associated with substantial harm and supported mechanistic concerns, without assigning an unsupported universal probability of addiction to a spin or machine. Newall et al., 2024.
Physical Slots and Online Slot Games
Physical machines operate within gambling venues that shape the surrounding experience through layout, access, cash or electronic payment, closing rules, and opportunities for social contact. Online slots can be accessed through devices in more private settings and may make sessions possible at additional times and places. Deposit systems, promotions, reminders, autoplay options, and digital account features influence exposure in different ways. The legal rules and protections vary across markets. Online access is a channel for gambling activity, not a distinct diagnostic disorder. The separately published Online Gambling Addiction: Risks, Signs, and Recovery article examines the wider online environment.
Near-miss mechanisms can be studied in online simulators, but the degree to which findings generalize to commercial gambling depends on whether money was actually at risk, participant gambling experience, game mathematics, and context. A preregistered series published in 2024 supports short-term near-miss behavioral effects in simulated online play; it should not be presented as an online-versus-casino randomized trial of later gambling disorder. The Near-Miss Effect in Online Slot Machine Gambling, 2024.
Financial, Family, and Mental Health Consequences
The most immediate pathway to harm is financial. A person may spend beyond disposable income, borrow, use credit, sell assets, or divert money from household needs. Debt can then intensify shame, conflict, and renewed attempts to win money back. Families may experience uncertainty about shared funds, deception around spending, disrupted caregiving, and substantial stress. The appropriate response includes both gambling-specific treatment and practical financial support when needed. Clinicians must recognize that relatives and partners can be harmed independently of whether the player meets formal diagnostic criteria. World Health Organization, 2024; NICE NG248, 2025.
Gambling problems are associated with increased suicidal thoughts and attempts, which makes direct, compassionate assessment of suicide risk essential in severe or escalating presentations. A 2024 meta-analysis reported substantially higher odds of lifetime suicidal ideation and attempts among people with gambling problems than comparison groups. The authors emphasized limitations in causal and temporal interpretation because longitudinal studies remain scarce. This evidence concerns gambling problems broadly; it does not justify a separate numerical suicide-risk estimate for slot players. Kristensen et al., 2024.
If gambling losses are accompanied by suicidal thoughts, a plan to harm oneself, or immediate danger, the priority is urgent local emergency or crisis care, with practical support from a trusted person when possible. A financial crisis and severe shame should be addressed together with clinical safety. If immediate danger is present, contact local emergency services now. NICE NG248, 2025.
Screening and Professional Assessment
A meaningful assessment documents the types of gambling used, time spent, wagered amounts and net losses, changes in spending, attempts to stop, loss chasing, functional consequences, and emotional triggers. Asking how often the person plays is only a starting point. Interviews should consider the relationship between gambling and mood, substance use, medications, family stress, accessibility of credit, and prior treatment. A diary or account history can help reconcile remembered payouts with actual net expenditure, provided the review protects privacy and does not inadvertently prompt more gambling.
Validated scales such as PGSI can identify levels of risk, while clinical diagnosis depends on a qualified assessment under the relevant classification. A score is not a substitute for a diagnostic interview. The NICE guideline recommends asking directly about gambling-related harms, assessment of co-occurring needs, and safety planning as appropriate. Specialized assessment is particularly important when suicidal ideation, bipolar symptoms, severe debt, or major functional impairment is present. NICE NG248, 2025.
What Helps: Treatment, Safeguards, and Recovery
Cognitive behavioral treatment and motivational care
Gambling-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) addresses patterns such as chasing losses, biased interpretations of chance, cue-triggered urges, and coping with distress. Treatment also develops realistic plans for responding to high-risk settings, rebuilding routines, protecting finances, and managing setbacks. A Cochrane synthesis of randomized trials supports benefits from psychological therapies, particularly CBT, for gambling problems while noting questions about durability and evidence quality. NICE NG248 recommends gambling-specific CBT delivered by appropriately qualified professionals and includes relapse-prevention components. Cochrane Review, 2012; NICE NG248, 2025.
Motivational interviewing and related engagement approaches can support people who feel ambivalent about change, though their evidence should be judged separately from structured CBT. Care should respond to associated depression, anxiety, substance use, sleep difficulties, or acute mental-health concerns. Medication is not an automatic treatment for slot gambling. NICE suggests specialist-supervised naltrexone only in specified circumstances after insufficient response to psychological treatment or repeated relapse; it is not a self-directed remedy. NICE NG248, 2025.
Blocking access, self-exclusion, and money safeguards
Practical risk reduction can include stopping the activity, self-exclusion from venues or accounts, disabling promotional messages, restricting access to gambling-related payment methods, and involving trusted support with financial planning when freely agreed. Useful arrangements distinguish a spending limit from an actual barrier: a limit that a player can readily raise or bypass may provide less protection during a crisis. Safeguards are most appropriate when tailored to the person's harms, goals, and available services. The evidence for individual harm-minimization tools is heterogeneous. A systematic review of preventive interventions for online and electronic gambling identified methodological limitations and variable findings rather than a universal protective effect across products. Preventive Interventions and Harm Reduction, 2022.
For people with established loss of control, temporary abstinence and comprehensive gambling-focused treatment may be more appropriate than relying on willpower during an active gambling session. NICE describes abstinence as a typical treatment goal to be discussed and agreed with the person while also addressing financial, relational, and mental-health outcomes. Family members and affected others may need their own advice and support. NICE NG248, 2025.
Recovery over time
Recovery can involve repeated work on financial stability, environmental triggers, rebuilding trust, managing cravings, and treating co-occurring conditions. Outcome studies commonly measure gambling frequency and symptom change over months rather than proving permanent recovery after a brief intervention. A lapse is a clinical signal to reassess circumstances and support, not an automatic prediction that the person will never regain control. Effective follow-up recognizes that risks can change when access, finances, relationships, and emotional circumstances change. NICE NG248, 2025.
What Regulation and Safer Product Design May Contribute
Product-level measures can address event frequency, stake size, transparent net-loss presentation, access controls, messaging, and the availability of breaks. For example, replacing celebratory sounds on net-loss outcomes improved accurate outcome classification in a controlled experiment. Slower play may reduce the number of wagers possible in a given period, although a player's actual losses also depend on bet size, game mathematics, and session behavior. Each measure should be evaluated against real-world outcomes, not only whether participants report liking it. Dixon et al., 2015; The Impact of Speed of Play in Gambling, 2017.
A public-health approach combines product safety, consumer information, access to treatment, financial protections, and measures appropriate to the local market. Individual responsibility has a role in decision-making, but product exposure and surrounding commercial incentives are legitimate subjects for regulation and scientific measurement. Reviews of harm-reduction trials find mixed outcomes and significant methodological weaknesses. The policy question therefore requires reliable comparative evaluation: which intervention reduces meaningful financial and clinical harm, for whom, under what conditions, and for how long? Preventive Interventions and Harm Reduction, 2022; World Health Organization, 2024.
How Strong Is the Scientific Evidence?
The evidence for a measurable near-miss effect on arousal and certain short-term choices is supported by a systematic experimental review and newer preregistered studies, with meaningful differences across outcome measures. The evidence that celebratory feedback can mask net-loss outcomes is supported by multiple controlled experiments. The association between EGM expenditure and problem-gambling measures is documented at population level, although ecological confounding and high heterogeneity limit causal interpretation. The clinical association between gambling problems and suicidality is established in systematic syntheses, while direction and mechanisms require careful case-by-case assessment. Barton et al., 2017; Kristensen et al., 2024.
Evidence is more limited for predicting an individual's future gambling disorder from exposure to a particular machine feature. Many laboratory studies use simulated credits, convenience samples, brief sessions, or participants whose circumstances differ from clinical treatment populations. Some results are affected by outcome definitions, machine settings, or baseline gambling severity. Research on prevention and gambling treatment shows benefits in selected contexts, yet long-term comparisons and implementation studies remain necessary. Scientific certainty is highest when a claim is narrowly matched to the study design and measured outcome. The Near-Miss Effect in Slot Machines, 2019; Preventive Interventions and Harm Reduction, 2022.
Questions Readers Commonly Ask
Are slot machines more addictive than other kinds of gambling?
Electronic gambling machines have product characteristics strongly associated with risk and prominent roles in some jurisdictions' gambling-harm burden. Comparing their intrinsic addictive potential with every other form of gambling requires equivalent measures of exposure, participant selection, financial stakes, and outcomes. Rankings derived from treatment samples can reflect which activities people already prefer or can access. A machine's rapid play and misleading feedback deserve attention without claiming a universal, proven hierarchy across all markets. Newall et al., 2024.
Does a near miss mean a slot machine is about to pay out?
No. A near miss is a loss under the game rules and does not itself increase the chance of a win on a subsequent independently randomized spin. It can feel like progress because the displayed symbols resemble a winning combination. The emotional effect is a psychological response, while the mathematical probability follows the particular game's rules and mechanisms. Barton et al., 2017.
Can someone experience slot-machine harm without gambling every day?
Yes. Serious losses, debt, conflict, or distress may occur without daily play or a formal diagnosis. Clinical evaluation considers control, sustained patterns, impairment, and consequences alongside frequency and money spent. People should seek assessment and support whenever harms become significant. World Health Organization, 2024.
Does changing the sound or slowing the machine prevent addiction?
These features may alter immediate responses or reduce opportunities for rapid wagering. Controlled studies support specific effects, such as improved recognition of losses when loss feedback is changed. Direct evidence that one feature change prevents future clinical gambling disorder across populations is more limited. Effective prevention should be evaluated with meaningful longer-term harm measures. Dixon et al., 2015; Preventive Interventions and Harm Reduction, 2022.
What is the first useful action when playing slots feels out of control?
Stop the immediate wagering activity, protect access to money needed for essentials, and contact a qualified gambling support or health service for an assessment. If debt, concealment, severe mood symptoms, or suicidal thoughts are present, seek coordinated support that addresses safety and finances as well as gambling behavior. Treatment planning can include gambling-specific CBT, practical access barriers, and continuing care. NICE NG248, 2025.
Related Articles
Gambling Reward Psychology: Near Misses, Loss Chasing, and Illusion of Control examines reinforcement learning, cognitive distortions, and the interaction between uncertainty and persistence across gambling formats.
Online Gambling Addiction: Risks, Signs, and Recovery covers online access, gambling environments, assessment, digital protections, and recovery pathways.
Gambling Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment addresses recognized diagnostic criteria, differential assessment, treatment, and clinical recovery.
Cluster Gambling, Gaming and Behavioral Addictions provides the wider research chapter connecting gambling disorder, gaming disorder, product-level mechanisms, and related clinical evidence.
References
Barton, K. R., Yazdani, A., Ayer, N., et al. (2017). The effect of losses disguised as wins and near misses in electronic gaming machines: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33, 1241–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9688-0
Dixon, M. J., et al. (2010). Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105, 1819–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03050.x
Dixon, M. J., et al. (2014). The allure of multi-line games in modern slot machines. Addiction, 109, 1920–1928. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12675
Dixon, M. J., et al. (2015). Using sound to unmask losses disguised as wins in multiline slot machines. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9411-8
Dixon, M. J., et al. (2018). Dark flow, depression and multiline slot machine play. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28589480/
Dixon, M. J., Larche, C. J., Stange, M., Graydon, C., and Fugelsang, J. A. (2018). Near-misses and stop buttons in slot machine play: An investigation of how they affect players, and may foster erroneous cognitions. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34, 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9699-x
Fiskaali, A., Stenbro, A. W., Marcussen, T., and Rask, M. T. (2023). Preventive interventions and harm reduction in online and electronic gambling: A systematic review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 39, 883–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10126-6
Graydon, C., Dixon, M. J., Stange, M., and Fugelsang, J. A. (2019). Gambling despite financial loss—the role of losses disguised as wins in multi-line slots. Addiction, 114, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14406
Harrigan, K., Dixon, M., and Brown, D. (2015). Modern multi-line slot machine games: The effect of lines wagered on winners, losers, bonuses, and losses disguised as wins. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9436-z
Harris, A., and Griffiths, M. D. (2018). The impact of speed of play in gambling on psychological and behavioural factors: A critical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34, 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9701-7
Kristensen, J. H., et al. (2024). Suicidality among individuals with gambling problems: A meta-analytic literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 150, 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000411
Markham, F., Young, M., Doran, B., and Sugden, M. (2017). A meta-regression analysis of 41 Australian problem gambling prevalence estimates and their relationship to total spending on electronic gaming machines. BMC Public Health, 17, 495. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4413-6
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2025). Gambling-related harms: Identification, assessment and management (NG248). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng248/chapter/recommendations
Newall, P. W. S., et al. (2024). Skill-based electronic gaming machines: Features that mimic video gaming, features that could contribute to harm, and their potential attraction to different groups. Journal of Gambling Studies, 40, 1483–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-024-10296-5
Palmer, L., Ferrari, M. A., and Clark, L. (2024). The near-miss effect in online slot machine gambling: A series of conceptual replications. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 38, 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000999
Pisklak, J. M., Yong, J. J. H., and Spetch, M. L. (2020). The near-miss effect in slot machines: A review and experimental analysis over half a century later. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36, 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09891-8
Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling. (2012). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008937.pub2
World Health Organization. (2024). Gambling. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/gambling