School belonging is a student's experienced sense of being accepted, respected, included, and supported in the social life of a school. It concerns whether the student regards the school as a community in which they have a legitimate place and meaningful relationships with peers and adults. Belonging is psychologically important because educational activity takes place within relationships: students interpret feedback, seek help, risk making mistakes, choose goals, and decide whether participation is safe and worthwhile within a particular social environment. The construct was operationalized in Carol Goodenow's foundational work on psychological school membership and subsequently examined across educational, motivational, developmental, and school-climate research Goodenow, 1993; Osterman, 2000.
The most reliable broad conclusion is that students who report stronger school belonging also tend to report more favorable academic motivation, engagement, self-perceptions, and social-emotional adjustment. The relationship with grades or standardized achievement is usually smaller than the relationship with motivational or relational outcomes. A synthesis of 82 correlational studies of secondary education makes that distinction explicit, and evidence about the consequences of deliberately changing belonging requires separate examination of experiments Korpershoek et al., 2020. School belonging therefore deserves attention as a measurable dimension of educational experience, a possible contributor to learning conditions, and an outcome that schools have their own reasons to value.
What School Belonging Means
Psychological membership and everyday experience
A student experiences school belonging when ordinary interactions communicate that their presence matters. They can expect fair treatment, recognize themselves as a member of the community, approach at least some adults for support, contribute to classroom activity, and participate without having to hide defining aspects of themselves. This experience may vary across a school day. A student can feel welcome in a science class and excluded during lunch, enjoy a friendship group while distrusting school discipline, or identify strongly with an arts program while feeling disconnected from the wider institution. Such variation helps explain why a school's general reputation cannot substitute for students' individual reports.
Goodenow defined psychological school membership in terms of perceived acceptance, respect, inclusion, and support, and developed the 18-item Psychological Sense of School Membership scale from research in suburban and urban early-adolescent settings. The scale-development studies connected membership more strongly with self-reported school motivation than with grades, an early illustration of the construct's motivational proximity Goodenow, 1993.
Belonging, connectedness, identification, engagement, and friendship
School belonging overlaps with school connectedness, which US public-health guidance describes through students' sense that adults and peers care about them and their learning. Research instruments sometimes use the terms interchangeably, although connectedness can place greater emphasis on caring relationships and school attachment CDC, 2024. School identification generally concerns the importance of school membership to one's self-concept and the degree to which students adopt school-related values. These concepts overlap, but affiliation with an institution and felt interpersonal acceptance can move independently.
Student engagement refers to students' participation in learning activities and often includes behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and agentic dimensions. A student may complete assignments and attend classes consistently while feeling profoundly isolated; another may feel accepted yet struggle with attention, resources, or instruction. Engagement is therefore a related outcome and process rather than an interchangeable measure of belonging. For a detailed treatment of that separate educational construct, see Student Engagement: Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Dimensions.
Friendship quality concerns particular peer relationships. School belonging involves a broader social ecology that includes classroom norms, teachers, group boundaries, school safety, and opportunities for participation. A student can have one close friend and still perceive widespread exclusion, or lack a close friendship at school yet feel respected and welcomed by the institution. Loneliness is the distressing discrepancy between wanted and experienced social connection; low belonging may accompany loneliness, but the measures and implications differ.
Why Belonging Matters for Motivation
Relatedness within self-determination theory
Self-determination theory treats relatedness, competence, and autonomy as basic psychological needs that support the internalization of valued activities and more self-determined forms of motivation. In school, relatedness means feeling connected to significant people; competence means feeling able to meet meaningful challenges; autonomy means experiencing participation as appropriately self-endorsed. A belonging-supportive classroom can help students interpret academic effort as participation in a valued social practice. Yet relatedness is one component of a broader motivational system, and positive relationships do not replace clear instruction, attainable challenges, or genuine agency Ryan and Deci, 2000.
The general need-to-belong framework similarly proposes that stable, valued interpersonal bonds have implications for emotion, cognition, and behavior. Its educational application suggests plausible pathways from social inclusion to students' willingness to enter demanding learning situations, but the framework is theoretical: claims about particular school interventions must be supported by studies of those interventions Baumeister and Leary, 1995.
Participation, feedback, and academic risk
Asking a question publicly, acknowledging confusion, approaching a teacher after a poor grade, and contributing to group work carry interpersonal risk. Acceptance can make these behaviors easier to attempt because a mistake need not be interpreted as evidence that one is an outsider. Exclusion can make ambiguous feedback feel threatening. This is a psychologically plausible connection between belonging and learning participation; however, studies measuring the two at the same time cannot establish that changing belonging alone will raise test scores.
A productive classroom does more than provide warm sentiment. Students need intellectual demands, equitable access to help, transparent criteria, and constructive responses to mistakes. Belonging and competence develop in reciprocal social experiences: successful participation can strengthen membership, and membership can encourage further participation. Stronger claims about the direction of this relationship require longitudinal, experimental, or carefully controlled designs rather than a single questionnaire administered at one moment.
Identity, expectations, and belonging uncertainty
Belonging uncertainty arises when students wonder whether they are accepted or whether a setback indicates that people like them have no place in the setting. Small events, including a low grade or a socially awkward interaction, can become diagnostic of membership under uncertainty. Research on brief social-belonging interventions investigates whether presenting early difficulty as common and potentially temporary changes how students interpret those events. Such interventions target interpretation and participation, not a student's inherent capacity to learn. Their effects depend on what opportunities the institution actually supplies Walton and Cohen, 2011; Walton et al., 2023.
What the Meta-Analyses Actually Show
Secondary-school outcomes across 82 correlational studies
Korpershoek, Canrinus, Fokkens-Bruinsma, and de Boer synthesized 82 peer-reviewed correlational studies published from 2000 through 2018, focusing on secondary-school students. Across studies, belonging had a small positive association with academic achievement; small to moderate positive associations appeared with motivational outcomes, including mastery-oriented goals, and with self-perceptions and behavioral, cognitive, and agentic engagement. Associations with absenteeism and dropout indicators were negative and generally small. The review examined variation across grade, socioeconomic status, region, and instruments, finding broadly similar patterns with some measurement and geographic variation Korpershoek et al., 2020.
Those results describe differences observed among students and settings. Students who feel connected may work more persistently; academic success may also earn recognition and strengthen connection; supportive schools may improve both; family resources, safety, prior attainment, and peer processes may influence all three. Pooling many observational associations narrows uncertainty about the average association but does not remove confounding or determine causal order. Achievement also reflects curriculum, instruction, cognitive resources, assessment design, and opportunity, which helps explain why its observed association with belonging is smaller than for relationally proximal outcomes.
Factors associated with stronger belonging
Allen, Kern, Vella-Brodrick, Hattie, and Waters reviewed factors associated with school belonging and synthesized evidence across relevant domains. The review identifies a combination of teacher support, peer support, family support, personal characteristics, emotional stability, academic motivation, school safety, extracurricular participation, and demographic factors as relevant correlates. These domains should be treated as a map of interrelated conditions, rather than a ranked list of interventions with known causal effect sizes. Different samples, measures, and study designs limit simple comparisons among correlates Allen et al., 2018.
Teacher-student relationship research provides a complementary picture. Roorda and colleagues' meta-analytic update pooled 189 studies involving 249,198 students from preschool through high school. Positive and negative relationship qualities were associated with engagement and achievement; a meta-analytic structural equation model found that engagement statistically accounted for part of the association with achievement. This is compatible with an engagement pathway, but statistical mediation of largely observational data by itself does not prove that improving a relationship produces a specific academic gain Roorda et al., 2017.
Large international surveys and their limits
The OECD's PISA 2022 survey collected self-reports of belonging from 15-year-old students across participating education systems. On average, roughly three quarters reported that they belonged at school; substantial minorities reported feeling lonely, awkward, or left out. Differences across systems and student groups make belonging an educational equity issue. PISA also found that high mathematics performance and strong belonging did not always occur together, a warning against treating grades as a proxy for inclusion OECD, 2023.
International survey associations require caution. Cultural norms affect whether respondents endorse strong agreement, language and school organization affect item meaning, and exclusion of absent or out-of-school adolescents may matter for generalization. Cross-sectional country comparisons cannot determine that a national policy caused observed differences. They are valuable for surveillance, hypotheses, and identifying unequal experiences, especially when combined with school-level and individual-level measures.
The Social Ecology of School Belonging
Teachers and trusted adults
A supportive adult relationship gives students access to academic guidance and a dependable interpreter of school expectations. Belonging-supportive teaching is visible in routine practices: students' names are learned and pronounced accurately, contributions are taken seriously, feedback preserves dignity, help requests receive meaningful responses, and standards are enforced consistently. Perceived favoritism, humiliation, and arbitrary discipline communicate the opposite message even in a classroom with strong test results. The consistent correlation between affective teacher-student relationships and engagement warrants close attention, while practical causal claims require program-specific evidence Roorda et al., 2017.
Belonging is also institutional. A trusted teacher cannot always compensate for inaccessible school facilities, discriminatory peer climates, unsafe hallways, or exclusionary disciplinary structures. Schools should evaluate the full student experience rather than make one teacher responsible for resolving every source of alienation.
Peer acceptance, rejection, and group boundaries
Peers supply recognition, companionship, collaboration, and informal information about who is considered a legitimate group member. Cooperative tasks can create productive contact when roles are equitable, tasks are meaningful, and adults actively prevent harassment. Simply placing students into groups may intensify status hierarchies when the same students are repeatedly silenced or assigned low-status roles. Peer support is among the reliable correlates reported in school-belonging research, but observational support cannot specify a universal grouping strategy Allen et al., 2018.
Bullying and public ridicule directly undermine the expectation of safety necessary for participation. Efforts to support belonging therefore intersect with consistent protection against peer aggression, confidential reporting, timely responses, and restorative opportunities when appropriate. Public-health guidance emphasizes adult and peer caring, positive classroom management, and schoolwide connectedness as practical targets CDC, 2024.
Family support, transitions, and community
Families can help students interpret school experiences, access resources, and maintain expectations of care. PISA 2022 reported that students who perceived stronger family support generally reported more positive school belonging and life satisfaction. The evidence is observational and cannot make families alone responsible for problems arising from institutional exclusion OECD, 2023.
School transitions deserve particular attention. Moving from elementary to middle school, changing peer networks, entering a selective program, migrating to a new education system, or joining a school midyear may unsettle existing relationships and social expectations. Predictable orientation, access to a named adult, peer introduction, and genuine participation opportunities are coherent preventive responses, although the size and durability of benefits must be established for each program and age group.
Safety, equity, and social position
A student cannot be expected to feel accepted when their accessibility needs are ignored, their language is disparaged, or their identity exposes them to routine hostility. Equitable belonging means the presence of meaningful access and protection, not compelled conformity to the dominant peer group. Students with disabilities, multilingual learners, students experiencing discrimination, and other marginalized groups may encounter specific barriers that disappear inside schoolwide averages. CDC connectedness guidance explicitly recognizes differences in the experiences of groups exposed to exclusion CDC, 2024.
The relevant questions concern opportunity and treatment: Who is heard? Which students obtain help? Whose achievements are publicly recognized? Who faces disproportionate discipline? Which school activities are financially or physically accessible? Such questions produce actionable information without pathologizing a student's response to an environment that genuinely excludes them.
Belonging, Academic Outcomes, and Well-Being
Attendance, persistence, and participation
Belonging is associated with engagement and attendance-related indicators, but the relationship is complex. Absence may reduce opportunities to make friends; feeling excluded may also make school attendance aversive; health conditions, transportation, caregiving, and financial constraints can influence attendance independently. The secondary-school meta-analysis found generally small negative associations between belonging and absence or dropout measures. The strongest educational response is to investigate barriers rather than infer low motivation from a student's attendance record Korpershoek et al., 2020.
Participation should also be interpreted in context. An enthusiastic classroom discussion can coexist with exclusion during unstructured time; a quiet student may be deeply engaged while preferring fewer public exchanges. High-quality belonging assessment therefore combines student reports with conditions of participation, not merely visible sociability.
Anxiety, loneliness, and mental-health correlates
Students who feel accepted often report more favorable social-emotional functioning. School connectedness is discussed in US public-health guidance as a protective correlate of adolescent well-being and health-related outcomes CDC, 2024. These patterns support careful attention to school environments while leaving distinct clinical questions to appropriate assessment. Loneliness, distress, school avoidance, and anxiety are experiences that can warrant support; none can be diagnosed from a school belonging score alone. Persistent impairment or safety concerns require appropriately qualified student-support and clinical evaluation.
School belonging interventions should not be described as treatments for depression, anxiety disorders, or other diagnosed conditions without condition-specific controlled evidence. A school can improve interpersonal safety and identify students needing care while recognizing the different evidence standards governing educational climate and clinical treatment.
Why achievement effects can be modest
Achievement tests sample learned knowledge and skills. Belonging may influence access to help, persistence, or attention across months, but learning outcomes also depend on the quality and quantity of instruction, prior knowledge, practice, assessment alignment, and opportunity. Social belonging may improve participation without an immediate measurable increase in grades. This distinction matters for evaluation: a program can have meaningful social effects even when average achievement changes are small; conversely, a statistically significant achievement difference may be too small or too context-specific to justify broad claims Korpershoek et al., 2020.
Does Increasing Belonging Improve Educational Outcomes?
What randomized experiments can establish
In a randomized trial involving 92 incoming college students, Walton and Cohen tested a brief intervention intended to normalize uncertainty about belonging and reported longer-term academic and health-related effects among the studied population. Randomization strengthens causal inference about the assigned intervention in that setting. Nevertheless, the sample was small, the participants were entering college rather than attending secondary school, and the intervention combined specific narrative elements with a distinctive institutional context. Its findings should not be generalized automatically to every school, age group, or classroom Walton and Cohen, 2011.
A larger randomized study published in 2023 involved 26,911 incoming students across 22 US colleges and universities. It reported improved first-year full-time completion in relevant student groups, with important moderation by institutional conditions: effects were found where students' groups had actual opportunities to belong. This is strong evidence that social-belonging messages can matter in some postsecondary settings and strong evidence against viewing a brief message as a substitute for inclusive institutions. The outcome was college progression, not a demonstration of the same effect in elementary or secondary schools Walton et al., 2023.
Schoolwide practices and targeted programs
Schools can target structural conditions that plausibly support belonging: safety from harassment, adult availability, equitable participation, classroom cooperation, accessible extracurricular involvement, respectful discipline, reliable transition support, and meaningful student voice. CDC guidance identifies positive classroom management, relationship building, and approaches that connect young people to supportive adults as school-level options CDC, 2024. These are practical directions supported by a broader evidence and professional-guidance base, but each component has different intervention studies, target populations, implementation demands, and outcome measures.
A program's success should be defined before implementation. Is the primary outcome students' perceived membership, reduced peer victimization, attendance, classroom engagement, psychological distress, or academic achievement? An intervention may influence one outcome and leave another unchanged. A change in student survey scores immediately after an assembly is weaker evidence of sustained benefit than repeated measures with a valid comparator and adequate follow-up.
Conditions for effective implementation
A credible belonging initiative starts with an audit of actual opportunities. Staff and students should identify where exclusion occurs, which relationships are available, and which rules or routines intensify marginalization. Programs should be co-designed with the students who experience the problem, with protection against retaliation for honest feedback. Adult relationship commitments need staffing time, accountability, and continuity. A short intervention may shift interpretations when the surrounding social reality is genuinely supportive; when that reality remains hostile, an encouraging slogan may expose a credibility gap Walton et al., 2023.
Implementation fidelity and adaptation both matter. An approach tested at a residential university cannot simply be copied into a multilingual primary school. Teachers should know the intervention's hypothesized mechanism, population, comparator, and measured outcomes; adaptation should preserve essential functions while addressing local barriers. This keeps program design aligned with evidence instead of branding every socially positive activity as a validated belonging intervention.
Measuring School Belonging Well
Validated student-report scales
The Psychological Sense of School Membership scale remains a foundational instrument, built to assess adolescents' perceived membership in the school social environment. Its original validation included urban and suburban middle-school samples and English and Spanish forms. This history supports using it as a measurement starting point, but local reliability, factor structure, reading accessibility, and equivalence across populations still require examination when it is used in a new setting Goodenow, 1993.
Brief indices in international surveys can illuminate patterns at scale. PISA measures belonging through student statements such as feeling accepted, belonging, loneliness, and exclusion. These measures provide useful aggregate comparisons, but they do not describe every dimension of individual connection or substitute for the richer information available through confidential conversation and school-level investigation OECD, 2023.
Measurement error and construct overlap
Several threats complicate interpretation. Belonging items can overlap with the emotional dimension of engagement, school satisfaction, loneliness, or perceived teacher support; correlations between scales may therefore partly reflect shared item content. Responses can vary with recent events, classroom context, fear of disclosure, and the perceived safety of the survey. A measure may work differently across languages, grade bands, cultural groups, disability-related communication needs, and school types. Comparisons require attention to measurement invariance and uncertainty rather than an assumption that equal scores always mean equal experiences.
Schools should not label individual students as disordered, resistant, or deficient based on low belonging responses. A low score identifies an educational experience worth investigating. Aggregated results can guide prevention when collection is voluntary or appropriately governed, accessible, confidential, and interpreted with small-group privacy safeguards.
Stronger research designs and comparisons
Cross-sectional correlations can identify co-occurrence. Longitudinal designs help establish temporal ordering and within-student change but remain vulnerable to time-varying confounding. Randomized interventions can support causal claims about the assigned program when attrition, outcome reporting, clustering, and contamination are addressed. In schoolwide trials, classrooms or schools may need to be the units of randomization; analyses must respect those clusters. Reporting should include a suitable comparator, prespecified outcomes, effect sizes and uncertainty intervals, follow-up duration, subgroup analyses, implementation fidelity, missing data, and adverse effects.
A useful evaluation tracks meaningful changes in the actual school environment alongside student perceptions. It also tests whether effects persist after an initial campaign ends. Publication bias, flexible outcome choices, nonrepresentative samples, and variations in what is called 'belonging' limit synthesis across otherwise promising studies. Evidence strength is higher when independent teams replicate findings in distinct school contexts rather than repeatedly analyzing the same sample.
Developmental, Cultural, and Institutional Variation
Early adolescence and secondary school
Peer status, autonomy, school transitions, and identity exploration often become particularly salient during adolescence. This makes the secondary-school literature important, yet it also limits extrapolation to younger children. Measures designed for adolescents may not capture how younger children express trust and school membership. The 82-study meta-analysis was specifically about secondary education, and conclusions about preschool or adult learners should be tied to separate populations Korpershoek et al., 2020.
Multilingual learners and students with disabilities
An accessible school communicates membership through language supports, predictable routines, accommodations, opportunities to contribute, and respectful treatment. A newcomer who is still learning the language of instruction may feel isolated even with high academic potential. A student with sensory or communication needs may prefer different forms of social participation. Belonging initiatives work better when they recognize diverse participation preferences rather than equating social success with extroversion, immediate verbal response, or participation in one dominant culture.
These are educational design principles consistent with evidence about inclusive conditions and school connectedness; precise effect sizes for particular accommodations cannot be inferred from broad belonging correlations. Diagnostic assessment and legal support processes belong to their own professional frameworks. Students' accounts of access and treatment should be evaluated on their own merits.
Context beyond the school building
Online platforms, messaging groups, transportation, after-school activities, and the local community influence how inclusion is experienced. Exclusion in a class messaging channel may affect the next morning's classroom participation. Conversely, constructive digital collaboration can extend recognition and access to peers. Technology alone does not create reciprocal care. Schools should assess moderation, privacy, access, and students' actual relationships before attributing belonging gains to a platform or an AI-based educational tool.
Evidence-Based Directions for Teachers and School Leaders
Build relationships through repeated practices
Make welcoming behavior routine: learn student names; listen before judging; establish reliable help channels; explain assessment and discipline transparently; and create opportunities for students to contribute expertise. Monitor whether adults respond consistently across different groups. These practices directly address the relational constructs documented in the literature, although the combined package should be evaluated locally rather than assigned an invented universal effect size Allen et al., 2018; CDC, 2024.
Create safe and substantive participation
Structure collaborative work with meaningful roles and clear academic goals. Make it possible to ask for clarification privately and publicly. Challenge ridicule immediately and protect reporting routes. Provide multiple legitimate ways to participate, including writing, speaking, small-group work, and accessible digital formats. A shared academic endeavor supports belonging when it gives students recognized contributions, rather than only social rituals detached from learning.
Respond to identified exclusion
Use disaggregated, privacy-protecting student feedback to locate exclusion by setting and context. Interpret unexpected subgroup differences with students and families before choosing a response. Consider practical barriers such as transportation, participation fees, inaccessible spaces, biased placement, and unequal disciplinary treatment. Monitor whether students experience real improvement, not simply whether staff completed professional-development hours. Public-health guidance places connectedness within the school's responsibility to provide caring and supportive environments CDC, 2024.
Evaluate outcomes without overclaiming
Specify a primary belonging measure, the population, the comparator, and the expected follow-up before rolling out a program. Assess attendance and learning separately, because improved belonging need not translate immediately into higher standardized scores. Report both benefits and uneven effects. If possible, combine repeated student reports with independently collected safety, participation, and attendance indicators. Treat favorable changes as local evidence that can guide decisions, while recognizing limitations in causal inference.
School Belonging in the Artificial Era
Educational environments increasingly include remote classrooms, algorithmic recommendations, chat-based assistance, and AI tutors. These tools may alter opportunities to seek help or participate, but their educational efficacy and their effects on social membership are independent empirical questions. A student can obtain rapid explanations from an automated system while remaining socially isolated within the school. An accessible learning assistant may reduce some participation barriers, yet institutional care requires accountable teachers, peers, and policies.
Belonging research offers useful questions for technology evaluation: Does the system widen access for previously excluded learners? Does it protect student privacy and allow human support? Does it help students contribute to a real community or quietly displace relationships? Does its deployment change who receives attention and recognition? Those questions are research and governance priorities, not evidence that AI tools already improve school belonging. Claims about AI tutoring should be tested with learning outcomes, while claims about belonging require validated relational measures and suitable comparisons.
Common Questions About School Belonging
Is school belonging the same as having friends?
No. Friendships are specific relationships. School belonging is a broader perception of acceptance, respect, inclusion, and support involving peers, teachers, rules, opportunities, and institutional identity. One friendship may be protective without completely resolving schoolwide exclusion Goodenow, 1993.
Does a strong sense of belonging cause higher grades?
The strongest school-level evidence establishes a generally positive but modest association with academic achievement and stronger associations with engagement and motivational variables. Correlational studies cannot assign cause. Randomized belonging interventions have produced outcomes in certain postsecondary settings, but their effects depend on context and do not establish a universal grades benefit in K–12 schools Korpershoek et al., 2020; Walton et al., 2023.
How can a teacher recognize low belonging?
A student might report exclusion, distrust of adults, social withdrawal, or difficulty finding a safe place to participate. None of these signs alone proves low belonging, and quiet behavior itself is not a deficit. Confidential self-report and respectful inquiry provide better evidence than guessing from sociability or grades. Systematic school surveys can identify patterns when privacy is protected.
Can school belonging be improved with a single workshop?
A workshop may begin a conversation, but sustained acceptance depends on reliable social and institutional opportunities. Large college experiments demonstrate that even carefully designed brief messages work differently depending on the social conditions students subsequently encounter. Schools should prioritize credible relationships, safety, participation, and ongoing evaluation Walton et al., 2023.
Is low school belonging a mental-health diagnosis?
No. It is a description of an educational social experience. Persistent distress, functional impairment, or risk may justify separate support or clinical evaluation, but a belonging scale is not a diagnostic instrument. Programs for improving climate and professional care for psychiatric conditions use different assessment and evidence frameworks.
Scientific Conclusions
School belonging is a socially situated psychological experience of membership in an educational community. Its study connects educational psychology with motivation, peer relationships, teaching practice, equity, and student well-being. Evidence from multiple observational syntheses consistently associates stronger belonging with favorable motivational, engagement, and social-emotional outcomes; the association with academic achievement is generally smaller. This pattern is established as association, while particular causal pathways and intervention benefits vary with design, population, and institution Korpershoek et al., 2020; Allen et al., 2018.
The strongest practical conclusion is that membership must be made credible by the actual social environment. Teachers, peers, families, rules, safety, and access together shape whether students can participate as valued members. Experimental work shows that changing interpretations of belonging can improve selected outcomes when genuine opportunities are available, while the broader task of building inclusive educational institutions demands sustained evidence-informed action Walton et al., 2023.
Related Articles
Cluster Learning and Educational Psychology — the scientific parent chapter on learning, educational motivation, instruction, and educational environments.
Student Engagement: Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Dimensions — a separate analysis of participation and learning-related engagement.
Student Burnout: Academic Exhaustion and Research Status — the distinct Stress and Burnout canonical concerning academic exhaustion.
Academic Motivation: Self-Determination Theory in Education — Examine autonomy, competence, relatedness, internalization, and their role in educational motivation.
Achievement Goal Theory: Mastery, Performance, and Learning — Compare mastery and performance goals, approach and avoidance patterns, and classroom goal climates.
Self-Regulated Learning: How Students Plan, Monitor, and Adapt — Explain academic goal setting, monitoring, strategy selection, effort regulation, and intervention research.
References
Allen, K., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., and Waters, L. (2018). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8
Baumeister, R. F., and Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Enhance connectedness among students, staff, and families. https://www.cdc.gov/mental-health-action-guide/strategies/enhance-connectedness.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). School connectedness helps students thrive. https://www.cdc.gov/youth-behavior/school-connectedness/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). What schools can do. https://www.cdc.gov/youth-behavior/school-connectedness/what-schools-can-do.html
Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79–90. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ458926
Korpershoek, H., Canrinus, E. T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., and de Boer, H. (2020). The relationships between school belonging and students' motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta-analytic review. Research Papers in Education, 35(6), 641–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615116
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During – and From – Disruption. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en
Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323
Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., and Koomen, H. M. Y. (2017). Affective teacher-student relationships and students' engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11392867/
Walton, G. M., and Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., Logel, C., Yeager, D. S., Goyer, J. P., Brady, S. T., et al. (2023). Where and with whom does a brief social-belonging intervention promote progress in college? Science, 380(6644), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade4420