Defining quality of life and community participation
Intellectual disability involves significant limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior originating during the developmental period. Those characteristics can affect how information is understood, choices are communicated, and everyday activities are organized; they do not determine the value of a person's life or whether a specific arrangement will be meaningful. Functional capacities and support requirements vary greatly across individuals and contexts. Quality of life is consequently a multidimensional outcome of the relationship between a person and their circumstances, rather than a synonym for diagnostic severity or an intelligence-test score. AAIDD Schalock, Bonham, and Verdugo, 2008
Community participation refers to involvement in real-life situations outside a narrow service-defined routine: visiting friends, taking part in neighborhood events, joining clubs, using public transportation, studying, working, voting where eligible, practicing a faith or cultural tradition, advocating for oneself, and enjoying public spaces. Participation has several dimensions: frequency, diversity, individual choice, social connection, role, assistance required, and subjective meaning. A person who attends a recreation center every week without choosing the activity may have high attendance and little agency. Someone who takes part in one deeply valued weekly gathering may experience greater belonging. Measures that treat activity counts as the entire outcome overlook this distinction. WHO ICF Giummarra et al., 2022
The scientific objective is to connect reported well-being and observed opportunities with personally endorsed goals. This requires asking whose preferences define success, what barriers stand between the person and their goals, how communication is supported, and whether changes persist across time. Quality-of-life research includes both objective conditions, such as housing security and healthcare access, and subjective judgments, such as satisfaction, safety, or connectedness. Each provides information the other cannot replace. Verdugo et al., 2005
The eight-domain quality-of-life model
A widely used framework developed by Schalock and Verdugo organizes quality of life into eight interacting domains: emotional well-being, interpersonal relationships, material well-being, personal development, physical well-being, self-determination, social inclusion, and rights. The domains are a framework for inquiry and practical planning. They should guide assessment of a person's lived circumstances and preferences rather than operate as a fixed ranking of desirable lives. Their importance and expression vary across age, culture, individual aspirations, and the availability of accommodations. Amor et al., 2023 Schalock, Bonham, and Verdugo, 2008
Emotional and physical well-being
Emotional well-being concerns security, satisfaction, happiness, distress, and opportunities for recovery from stress. Physical well-being concerns health, sleep, nutrition, mobility, comfort, and access to appropriate care. Both domains require attention to communication: a person who communicates distress through altered behavior or a particular gesture may be overlooked if observers assume that only conventional speech conveys subjective experience. Pain, untreated sensory problems, depression, anxiety, or an unstable living environment can diminish quality of life without constituting features of intellectual disability itself. Clinical evaluation of changes from the individual's baseline remains important. NICE NG54 ASHA
Relationships, belonging, and social inclusion
Interpersonal relationships include family ties, friendships, intimate relationships, trusted supporters, colleagues, and reciprocal everyday contacts. Social inclusion concerns access to, welcome within, and recognized membership in communities. These domains overlap but have distinct outcomes: frequent use of public places does not ensure friendship, and valued relationships can also exist without high-frequency community outings. A qualitative synthesis of friendship studies highlights reciprocity, trust, and the challenges of sustaining relationships as important themes identified by people with intellectual disabilities themselves. Jackson et al., 2024
Belonging is relational. It involves being remembered, invited, consulted, missed when absent, and recognized for contributions. Programs often report the number of encounters, visits, or activities while leaving the nature of relationships less visible. A scientifically useful evaluation asks whether interactions extend beyond paid staff, whether the person can initiate and decline contact, and whether the setting accepts individualized ways of communicating. These questions require direct testimony and careful observation, not assumptions based on where services are located. Giummarra et al., 2022 Garcia-Lee et al., 2024
Material well-being and personal development
Material well-being includes adequate income, stable housing, needed possessions, accessibility, transportation, and protection from material deprivation. Personal development involves learning, skills, interests, goals, and the opportunity to acquire competence at any stage of life. These domains interact with available supports. A transport pass is useful only when travel is accessible and safe. A vocational placement becomes personally meaningful when the role fits the person's interests and offers real relationships, appropriate compensation, and prospects for growth. The relevant outcome is what opportunities become genuinely usable, rather than whether an intervention is merely delivered. WHO ICF Amor et al., 2023
Self-determination and rights
Self-determination involves expressing preferences, participating in decisions, setting goals, making choices, and exercising control over daily life. It can be expressed through speech, sign, pictorial systems, assistive communication, consistent behavior, or carefully supported interpretation of preferences. People requiring extensive assistance still have choices about routines, relationships, activities, surroundings, and the manner in which support is provided. A systematic review of interventions for people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities identified promising approaches, including choice-making supports and adaptations to environments, while finding heterogeneous interventions and substantial limitations in the evidence base. Kuld et al., 2023
Rights concern respect for personal integrity, privacy, freedom from discrimination, access to community services, and meaningful participation in decisions affecting one's life. Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities addresses the right to live in the community with choices equal to others and access to appropriate supports; Article 12 concerns equal recognition before the law. These are normative and legal commitments whose implementation depends on national law, institutional design, and practice. The existence of a right and a demonstrated improvement in a measured outcome are different forms of evidence. UN Article 19 UN Article 12
How environment and support shape participation
The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health treats functioning and participation as situated in an environment. Physical accessibility, communication formats, public attitudes, service rules, financial resources, transportation, support-worker practices, and social networks can operate as barriers or facilitators. A person's observed performance in one setting cannot be straightforwardly converted into a universal estimate of their capability. Accessible conditions may allow abilities and preferences that remain unseen under restrictive or confusing conditions to emerge. WHO ICF
An ecological assessment therefore looks across the person, immediate relationships, organizations, community infrastructure, and social policy. If an adult rarely visits friends, the explanation might include inaccessible transport, lack of privacy, rigid staff shifts, limited discretionary spending, anxiety, unsafe routes, or absence of invitations. Each potential explanation suggests a different intervention. Assigning the entire participation gap to the person's intellectual functioning would misidentify the modifiable determinants. The analytic task is to distinguish personal preference, skills, health needs, environmental opportunity, and the reliability of support rather than treating one domain as a proxy for all the others. Amor et al., 2023 Giummarra et al., 2022
An inclusive environment supplies meaningful choices as well as assistance. The same person may prefer autonomy in selecting where to go, active support while traveling, and private time during the activity. Support should be adjustable across situations. It can enable independence in decision-making even when help is needed to execute tasks. Professional and family supporters have a role in learning the person's communication, recognizing changes in preference, facilitating risk-informed choices, and reviewing whether their own routines are limiting participation.
Measuring quality of life: what should be assessed?
Standardized quality-of-life instruments can support individual planning, service evaluation, and research, but their value depends on the purpose of measurement and the group for whom they were validated. The eight-domain framework has informed tools including the Personal Outcomes Scale and other instruments intended for particular ages, settings, and communication profiles. Selecting an instrument requires examination of its target population, administration requirements, reliability, validity, language, informant format, floor effects, and responsiveness to change. A measure validated in one country or disability group should not be presumed equivalent in another without appropriate evaluation. Amor et al., 2023 Verdugo et al., 2005
Self-report and supported communication
A person's own appraisal is central when the question concerns satisfaction, feeling included, loneliness, preference, or happiness. Accessible assessment may use short sentences, familiar vocabulary, pictures, symbols, augmentative and alternative communication, additional processing time, and supported practice examples. Interviewers should check understanding, avoid leading questions, allow expressions of uncertainty, and maintain privacy when possible. Agreement to participate and the right to stop apply throughout the assessment. A response method must be tested for the particular person rather than selected solely from a diagnostic label. ASHA AAC Santoro et al., 2022
Some people cannot reliably answer standardized questions about abstract satisfaction even after reasonable accommodations. Their experiences remain important. Repeated observations of approach, withdrawal, pleasure, discomfort, engagement, communication signals, preferred companions, and decisions across familiar contexts can contribute information. Such indicators require an individualized baseline and careful interpretation because identical behaviors can have different functions. Interpreting observable behavior as a direct, unqualified report of subjective quality of life overstates what an observer knows.
Proxy reports and disagreement between informants
Family members, support staff, and clinicians can report observable circumstances and changes in functioning, but their judgments about internal experiences are not interchangeable with self-report. A scoping review of proxy reporting in intellectual disability documents variation in proxy use and the importance of identifying what information is being reported and by whom. A caregiver may accurately describe sleep, activity frequency, or transport access while being less certain about how satisfying an interaction feels to the person. Disagreement can reveal different perspectives and should prompt investigation rather than automatic correction of the person's answer. Santoro et al., 2022
One observational study of 102 adults found poor agreement between participants' self-reported quality of life and staff proxy assessments, with staff ratings generally lower. Its setting and sample limit broad generalization, but it illustrates why an analysis should preserve the respondent's identity and distinguish proxy-rated from self-rated outcomes. When a study combines these sources without accounting for method, its overall score may conceal systematic differences. Koch et al., 2015
Psychometric validity and change over time
Measurement validity concerns the interpretation of scores for a particular decision. Internal consistency alone does not establish that a questionnaire captures meaningful personal outcomes, that it works equally across disability levels, or that an observed numerical change reflects a real improvement. A COSMIN-based review of self-report measures for adolescents with intellectual disabilities identified insufficient evidence to recommend a specific instrument confidently for broad use, emphasizing the need for stronger validation. This finding should temper certainty about instrument selection for that age group; it does not imply that young people's perspectives are unmeasurable or irrelevant. Maguire et al., 2023
Assessment should distinguish a baseline from change, consider response shifts as expectations and experiences evolve, and include personally selected outcomes alongside standardized scores. For example, successfully using a public library without distress, making a chosen friend, or gaining a say in household routines may be more informative to an individual than a small shift on an aggregate scale. A scientifically defensible evaluation documents both the standardized indicator and why that indicator matters to the person.
Measuring community participation and inclusion
Participation can be assessed through individual interviews, structured observation, activity diaries, ecological mapping, service records, and reports from supporters. Useful dimensions include access, frequency, diversity, duration, preferred or imposed activity, presence of nonpaid relationships, reciprocal roles, decision-making authority, environmental adaptations, and satisfaction. Researchers should explicitly distinguish attendance from engagement and engagement from belonging. Community participation should also be assessed across settings: public places, workplaces, education, digital interactions, cultural activities, social organizations, and home-based social networks. WHO ICF Social inclusion review, 2023
A person may be physically present in mainstream settings and still experience isolation if others treat them only as a client, worker-in-training, or someone to be supervised. Evidence about social inclusion improves when research directly includes the perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities. A critical review of hundreds of publications on inclusion and segregation found that direct engagement with people with disabilities was a minority practice within the reviewed literature. Such gaps limit the strength of claims about belonging derived only from environmental labels or third-party assessments. Spivakovsky et al., 2023
Participation research must also respect nonparticipation as a possible choice. An individual may prefer a quiet home, a small number of close relationships, or an unconventional schedule. The relevant concern is whether the preference is genuine, informed, and supported, rather than the product of inaccessible opportunities or fear. A universal target for outings or group memberships is therefore a poor substitute for a person-defined outcome.
What research shows about community living
A systematic review by McCarron and colleagues synthesized 13 studies evaluating moves from institutions into community settings. Across the included studies, moving to community living was associated with improved measured quality of life. The review reported substantial standardized changes in pooled before-and-after analyses, but the included studies were heterogeneous and were concentrated in higher-income countries. These findings support the value of genuine community-based living while requiring attention to selection, historical context, measurement differences, and the absence of simple causal isolation in many designs. McCarron et al., 2019
Earlier comparative research reviewed 68 studies of residential outcomes and generally found advantages of community-based services across many measured domains, while also recording variability. Both reviews make a central point: a small building or community address does not by itself produce a good life. Staffing practices, choice of housemates, privacy, social opportunities, individualized supports, and community accessibility shape whether relocation becomes meaningful inclusion. Services may reproduce institutional routines within ordinary neighborhoods. Evaluations should therefore measure the actual social environment and the person's experience, not merely a facility category. Kozma, Mansell, and Beadle-Brown, 2009 McCarron et al., 2019
The evidence also has limits. Participants with extensive support needs, aging adults, and individuals living with family may be underrepresented. Outcomes can change as initial excitement, support intensity, or neighborhood conditions change. Long-term follow-up, comparative designs, and transparent reporting of implementation are necessary before attributing gains to a model of housing rather than to its specific supports.
Interventions that can improve participation
An umbrella review covering adults with intellectual disability, psychosocial disability, and autism identified a range of participation interventions: individualized social and community connection, supported group programs, community access opportunities, and skill-building approaches. Across the reviewed literature, person-centered matching, active facilitation, and responsiveness to social context emerged as relevant features. However, many reviews were methodologically weak and outcomes were inconsistently defined, so one cannot assign a single effect size to 'community participation programs' as a category. Results must be interpreted by population, intervention, comparator, and outcome. Giummarra et al., 2022
Choice-making and supported decisions
Practitioners can offer meaningful choices within existing daily activities, develop accessible information about options, respect refusals, and adapt the environment so decisions can be acted upon. Experimental studies summarized in the review by Kuld and colleagues included varied supports for choice-making, technology, goal-setting, and responsive assistance among people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. The review supports feasibility of targeted components while exposing small samples, uneven intervention definitions, and limits to meta-analysis. Increased numbers of choices are useful only when those choices are consequential and preferences remain revisable. Kuld et al., 2023
Supported decision-making is a process of enabling understanding, communication, and considered choice with trusted assistance. Its practical forms differ across jurisdictions and individual circumstances. The psychological outcome is meaningful participation in a decision; the legal status of any arrangement depends on local law. Supporters should document whose preference is being expressed and how conflicts between preferences, perceived risk, and service convenience are addressed. The person's communication needs shape the process. UN Article 12
Supported social connections and friendship
Friendship supports may include accessible opportunities to meet peers, travel assistance, social mediation requested by the person, reliable communication systems, and time away from staff-directed activities. A quality outcome is the development of freely sustained, reciprocal contact rather than mere exposure to new people. Paid supporters can facilitate encounters while avoiding control over whether or with whom relationships continue. The qualitative literature documents how people with intellectual disabilities describe friendship through mutual help, trust, and difficult social negotiations. Jackson et al., 2024
Employment, education, and meaningful roles
Work and learning can supply social roles, income, routine, personal development, and relationships when the setting is accessible and the activity fits the individual's priorities. Outcomes need to distinguish job placement from sustained work, compensation, choice of role, workplace inclusion, well-being, and advancement. The presence of a supported employment intervention does not establish benefit in every domain. Individualized job matching, coaching, transportation arrangements, and accessible communication are plausible components of participation support, but effectiveness should be judged using measured outcomes and appropriate comparisons. WHO ICF UN Article 19
Communication and assistive technology
Augmentative and alternative communication can enable expression of choices, advocacy, relationships, and access to public life. Appropriate systems may involve gestures, sign, communication boards, picture symbols, speech-generating devices, or a combination of methods. Selection requires individualized assessment and ongoing partner training. A device alone cannot create inclusion if communication partners ignore it, interaction opportunities are absent, or settings remain inaccessible. Evaluate both communication performance and the person-valued participation that becomes possible. ASHA AAC
Digital tools can broaden opportunities for connection, accessible information, and independent scheduling. They also introduce concerns about privacy, online exploitation, inaccessible interfaces, digital literacy, and unequal access. Evidence that one tool improves task completion does not automatically show that it increases subjective well-being or friendship. Outcomes should be measured separately and technology should remain aligned with the person's interests and safety preferences.
Personalized support planning and outcome evaluation
A practical quality-of-life plan begins by learning how the person communicates, identifying personally important domains, documenting preferred and disliked activities, and assessing environmental barriers. Supporters then specify a small number of measurable goals tied to genuine choices: for example, attending a chosen community event without avoidable distress, speaking with a friend independently using AAC, or taking part in decisions about household visitors. The plan records who provides assistance, when it is needed, how it will be faded or adjusted, and what would count as success from the person's standpoint. This translates a broad model into testable, person-valued outcomes. Amor et al., 2023
Outcome evaluation should include the person's self-report where feasible, direct observation when appropriate, family or staff information identified as proxy report, and concrete changes in available opportunities. Measures should be taken across more than one occasion, particularly when health, routine, staffing, or communication circumstances vary. The review process asks whether an observed improvement generalizes across settings, whether the person still wants the goal, whether supports remain respectful, and whether unintended harms such as fatigue, stress, or reduced privacy have appeared. A program may raise participation frequency without raising satisfaction; such a finding is a reason to revise the program rather than relabel the frequency metric as quality of life.
At organizational level, aggregated quality-of-life indicators can identify patterns of exclusion, inadequate transport, lack of choice, or inconsistent staff training. Aggregation should preserve individual variation, avoid obscuring people with extensive support requirements, and support accountability for service quality. Personal outcomes should inform changes to practice and resource allocation. A score is useful when the organization can explain the actions it takes in response. Schalock, Bonham, and Verdugo, 2008
Mental health, safety, and participation
Quality of life and participation are influenced by mental health, persistent pain, sleep, sensory needs, physical illness, trauma, and medication effects. A sudden reduction in community activities or change in behavior warrants attention to medical, psychological, relational, and environmental explanations. Intellectual disability is a developmental clinical diagnosis; loneliness, anxiety, depression, and pain are separately assessable experiences or conditions. Accessible clinical communication and knowledge of the person's usual baseline help prevent diagnostic overshadowing, in which symptoms are incorrectly attributed to intellectual disability. NICE NG54 ASHA
Safeguarding matters to participation because an unsafe environment can restrict freedom, while overly restrictive practices can themselves undermine rights and well-being. A balanced approach takes reports of harm seriously, makes communication and complaint mechanisms accessible, assesses genuine risks, and supports informed activity rather than enforcing avoidable isolation. Where self-injurious or challenging behavior occurs, a qualified assessment should investigate medical, emotional, communication, and environmental contributors, including the function of behavior; behavior alone is not a diagnosis. The goals of support include safety, agency, and quality of life as well as reduction in specified risks. NICE NG11 NICE NG54
The use of psychotropic medications requires a distinct clinical indication, monitoring, and informed decision-making accommodations. Quality-of-life gains from changing living conditions or support practices cannot be assumed to follow from medication changes alone. Care plans should track benefits, harms, person-defined goals, and the contributions of co-occurring conditions. Psychological treatment decisions belong within comprehensive clinical assessment rather than service-level efforts to make a person easier to manage.
Participation across the lifespan
During childhood, participation includes peer play, inclusive education, family and community activities, and opportunities to express preferences at a developmentally appropriate level. Youth transition planning expands attention to relationships, education, work, mobility, identity, financial arrangements, and decisions about adult services. Adolescents should participate meaningfully in these decisions with accessible explanations and communication support. Quality-of-life measures designed for adults cannot automatically be transferred to children or teenagers without validation; the systematic review of adolescent self-report instruments illustrates this gap. Maguire et al., 2023
In adulthood, priorities can include a chosen home, friendships, intimate relationships, family life, work, continuing education, civic activity, privacy, and independence in personally important decisions. The mix changes over time. Participation and satisfaction should be revisited when employment, family support, health, finances, housing, or social networks change. A goal selected by a supporter years earlier should not silently become a permanent definition of the person's good life.
Older adults may face new issues involving mobility, chronic illness, bereavement, retirement, cognitive change from baseline, and loss of longtime supporters. Services should preserve valued connections and accessible activities while adapting assistance to changing abilities. Research on community living and quality of life has less complete evidence for older people and those with complex needs, making individualized longitudinal assessment especially important. McCarron et al., 2019
Families, paid supporters, and community responsibilities
Families often sustain relationships, explain communication histories, advocate for accessible care, and create opportunities that formal services cannot replace. Their perspectives provide indispensable information about a person's life, but family preference and the adult person's preference may differ. A person-centered approach hears these perspectives explicitly and supports direct expression by the person. Supporters also need time, training, and organizational permission to facilitate meaningful participation instead of being evaluated solely on completed tasks.
Community inclusion requires responsibility beyond specialist services. Employers, schools, transit authorities, healthcare practices, public institutions, neighbors, and cultural organizations influence accessibility. Welcoming attitudes and ordinary reciprocal relationships expand choices in ways that a segregated service cannot provide alone. Policy interventions should therefore address transport, discrimination, communication access, affordable housing, and service coordination alongside individual skills. UN Article 19 WHO ICF
What the evidence can and cannot establish
Established conceptual and rights-based frameworks support multidimensional assessment, explicit attention to participation, and the inclusion of personal preferences. Systematic reviews offer evidence that community moves and certain individualized participation supports are associated with improved outcomes under studied conditions. Nevertheless, many studies are observational, involve small or selected groups, mix different diagnostic populations, or measure short-term activity rather than enduring relationships and subjective satisfaction. Evidence about a broad principle should not be mistaken for proof that a specific service model will benefit every individual. McCarron et al., 2019 Giummarra et al., 2022
Evidence is limited where people with profound intellectual disabilities, complex communication needs, and multiple disabilities are excluded from direct reporting or receive only proxy-based measurements. High-income countries dominate much of the literature on deinstitutionalization and community arrangements. Cross-cultural comparisons require attention to the meaning of autonomy, family life, material security, and rights in each setting, alongside universal commitments to participation and equal treatment. Research also needs stronger methods to distinguish the effects of housing changes, staffing quality, individualized supports, and community-level barriers.
Participatory and inclusive research can improve the relevance of questions, instruments, interpretations, and dissemination by involving people with intellectual disabilities as advisors, collaborators, or co-researchers. Yet involvement must itself be evaluated for accessibility and actual influence. A review of inclusion scholarship found limited direct engagement with disabled participants, illustrating a methodological weakness that can be addressed through accessible study design and transparent reporting. Garcia-Lee et al., 2024 Spivakovsky et al., 2023
Practical questions about quality of life and inclusion
Is quality of life determined by IQ or diagnostic severity?
No single IQ score or severity classification determines the quality of an individual's life. Intellectual and adaptive functioning inform assessment of abilities and support requirements, while quality of life asks how people experience and pursue valued outcomes in a given environment. Health, relationships, autonomy, access, and responsive assistance shape that experience. These constructs should be evaluated separately and then integrated in planning. AAIDD Amor et al., 2023
Can a person with profound intellectual disability express preferences?
Yes. Preferences may be communicated through individually meaningful movements, gaze, gestures, vocalizations, AAC, repeated choices, and behavior patterns interpreted within familiar contexts. Careful assessment and corroboration across circumstances are essential, especially when inferred preferences affect consequential decisions. A need for high levels of assistance does not eliminate the relevance of choice. Intervention reviews show that choice-making and related self-determination components can be targeted, although robust generalizable effect estimates remain limited. Kuld et al., 2023 ASHA AAC
Does living in the community automatically improve inclusion?
A community address creates possibilities, but actual inclusion depends on control over daily life, relationships, accessibility, safety, and quality of support. Reviews indicate many people have better measured quality of life after moving out of institutions; they also report heterogeneous outcomes and caution that restrictive routines can persist in smaller settings. Evaluation must examine lived conditions and person-reported experience. McCarron et al., 2019
Whose account of quality of life should be trusted?
The person's own account is essential for subjective experiences when accessible self-report is feasible. Families and supporters contribute observations, histories, and accounts of circumstances. When reports disagree, preserve each source, investigate the reasons, and avoid treating a proxy's assessment of happiness as an automatic substitute for the person's perspective. Instruments and reporting methods should match the particular question and individual's communication profile. Santoro et al., 2022
What outcome shows that a participation program works?
A defensible outcome combines evidence that opportunities increased with evidence of meaningful engagement, choice, satisfaction, and sustained relationships or roles. Depending on the goal, it may include successful independent or supported travel, reciprocal friendship, fewer participation barriers, improved confidence, better access to education or work, or greater influence over daily routines. The strongest designs track the selected outcome over time and describe supports and harms, rather than relying on attendance counts alone. Giummarra et al., 2022
Integrating quality of life into support and policy
Quality of life provides a way to assess whether intellectual disability services expand the opportunities and relationships people value. Community participation provides observable evidence about access and engagement, while self-reported experience and accessible observations establish how those opportunities are lived. A rigorous system combines the eight-domain framework, environmental analysis, individual communication, transparent outcome measurement, and continuing revision of supports. Good practice makes the individual a participant in defining success, treats community inclusion as a practical responsibility shared by services and society, and evaluates whether changes improve meaningful life outcomes. Amor et al., 2023 WHO ICF
Related Articles
Cluster Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities — Scientific foundations, clinical classification, assessment, support models, and the linked research chapter.
Adaptive Functioning in Intellectual Disability: Conceptual, Social, and Practical Skills — Everyday functioning and support requirements, distinct from quality-of-life outcomes.
Transition to Adulthood for Young People With Intellectual Disability — Preparation for adult relationships, learning, housing, work, and decision-making.
Mental Health Problems in People With Intellectual Disability: Recognition and Care — Recognition and care of co-occurring psychological conditions.
Autism and Intellectual Disability in Adults: Differences and Support — Distinct adult co-occurrence and differential-support topic.
Health Disparities and Access to Care for People With Intellectual Disability — Healthcare inequity and accessibility in ID.
Abuse Prevention and Safeguarding for People With Intellectual Disability — Risk prevention and accessible safeguarding systems.
References
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2021). Intellectual disability: Defining criteria. https://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Augmentative and alternative communication. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/augmentative-and-alternative-communication/
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Intellectual disability. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/intellectual-disability/
Amor, A. M., Verdugo, M. Á., Fernández, M., Aza, A., Sánchez-Gómez, V., and Wolowiec, Z. (2023). Development and validation of standardized quality of life measures for persons with IDD. Behavioral Sciences, 13(6), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13060452
Garcia-Lee, B., Strnadová, I., and Dowse, L. (2024). Researching belonging in the context of research with people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of inclusive approaches. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13178
Giummarra, M. J., Randjelovic, I., and O’Brien, L. (2022). Interventions for social and community participation for adults with intellectual disability, psychosocial disability or on the autism spectrum: An umbrella systematic review. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 3, 935473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.935473
Jackson, I., Dagnan, D., Golding, L., and Rayner-Smith, K. (2024). How do people with intellectual disabilities understand friendship? A systematic meta-synthesis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13244
Koch, A. D., Vogel, A., Becker, T., Salize, H.-J., Voss, E., Werner, A., Arnold, K., and Schützwohl, M. (2015). Proxy and self-reported quality of life in adults with intellectual disabilities: Impact of psychiatric symptoms, problem behaviour, psychotropic medication and unmet needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 45–46, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.022
Kozma, A., Mansell, J., and Beadle-Brown, J. (2009). Outcomes in different residential settings for people with intellectual disability: A systematic review. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114(3), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-114.3.193
Kuld, P. B., Frielink, N., Zijlmans, M., Schuengel, C., and Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2023). Promoting self-determination of persons with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 67(7), 589–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13036
Maguire, S., Davison, J., McLaughlin, M., Simms, V., and Bunting, B. (2023). Exploring the psychometric properties of self-report instruments used to measure health-related quality of life and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities: A COSMIN systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 36(5), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13110
McCarron, M., Lombard-Vance, R., Murphy, E., May, P., Webb, N., Sheaf, G., McCallion, P., Stancliffe, R., Normand, C., Smith, V., and O’Donovan, M.-A. (2019). Effect of deinstitutionalisation on quality of life for adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 9, e025735. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025735
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2015). Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: Prevention and interventions (NG11). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng11
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016). Mental health problems in people with learning disabilities: Prevention, assessment and management (NG54). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng54
Santoro, S. L., Donelan, K., and Constantine, M. (2022). Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(5), 1088–1108. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13013
Schalock, R. L., Bonham, G. S., and Verdugo, M. A. (2008). The conceptualization and measurement of quality of life: Implications for program planning and evaluation in the field of intellectual disabilities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.02.001
Spivakovsky, C., McVilly, K., Zirnsak, T.-M., Ainsworth, S., Graham, L., Harrison, M., Sojo, V., Gale, L., and Genat, A. (2023). The ontology and epistemology shaping our understanding of inclusion: A critical review of the research literature on disability and inclusion. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 20(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12461
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Article 12. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/article-12-equal-recognition-before-the-law.html
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Article 19. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/article-19-living-independently-and-being-included-in-the-community.html
Verdugo, M. A., Schalock, R. L., Keith, K. D., and Stancliffe, R. J. (2005). Quality of life and its measurement: Important principles and guidelines. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00739.x
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. https://www.who.int/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health