Possible selves are mental representations of who a person might become, wants to become, expects to become, or fears becoming. They place the self in the future and give personal meaning to anticipated opportunities, obligations, achievements, losses, and threats. A student may picture becoming a scientist, an adult may imagine being a dependable parent, and someone approaching retirement may anticipate becoming active and socially connected. Each image is a possible self when it is experienced as a potential version of oneself rather than merely an event that could happen.
The scientific question is how these representations influence present behavior. Possible selves can organize attention, interpretation, emotion, and planning, yet their motivational effects depend on whether a future identity feels relevant, plausible, and connected to action. The influential original formulation by Markus and Nurius (1986) proposed that such representations integrate self-knowledge with hopes, fears, goals, and threats. A later integrative review showed why favorable imagery, perceived future-self continuity, and discrepancies between present and future selves make different predictions and require attention to the conditions under which a future identity actually changes behavior (Oyserman and Horowitz, 2023).
What Are Possible Selves in Psychology?
Possible selves are future-oriented components of self-knowledge. A person can hold many possible selves simultaneously: a hoped-for career identity, a feared health outcome, a possible role in a relationship, an anticipated moral identity, and an imagined version of themselves who acts with greater confidence. Their contents may be specific or diffuse, vivid or schematic, attainable or highly uncertain. They can be close in time or situated decades ahead.
The term was established by Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius in their 1986 article in American Psychologist. Their theoretical contribution was to recognize that a person's self-concept contains possibilities as well as descriptions of their present characteristics. The future self is consequently embedded within present self-knowledge: what a person expects or fears becoming shapes the significance of what they notice and do today (Markus and Nurius, 1986).
An imagined self is distinct from a forecast about the world. “I might move to another city” is a potential event; “I could become someone who builds an independent life in another city” expresses identity, anticipated capacities, relationships, and agency. The difference matters because possible selves make goals self-relevant and can turn an abstract future outcome into a personally consequential direction of development.
Hoped-for, expected, feared, and avoided selves
Hoped-for possible selves represent desirable futures: becoming skilled, healthy, respected, connected, courageous, or capable of living in accordance with one's values. Expected possible selves concern futures that appear probable, including outcomes one may not prefer. A hoped-for future may be intensely desirable but judged unlikely, while an expected future may feel realistic and emotionally neutral. Feared possible selves are personally threatening outcomes, such as becoming isolated, dependent, unsuccessful, or alienated from important relationships. Avoided selves express a direction from which a person wants to move away.
These distinctions are analytic rather than rigid categories. One future can contain several emotional meanings, and the same possibility can attract one person while alarming another. A demanding leadership position, for example, can mean purpose, recognition, intolerable pressure, or all three. Research on identity motives indicates that people are drawn toward possible identities associated with meaning, efficacy, continuity, and self-esteem, while fearing futures that would frustrate these motives (Vignoles et al., 2008).
Possible selves are neither fantasies nor guaranteed plans
Some possible selves are deliberately elaborated through imagery or writing; others become available spontaneously when a situation makes them relevant. A planned professional identity can influence current training, while an unexpected encounter can awaken an alternative sense of what one's life might become. Possible selves can also be fictional, exaggerated, or incompatible with a person's actual opportunities. Scientific interpretation therefore examines not only content but perceived probability, availability of resources, perceived control, and links to action. Imagining an attractive future is a psychological event; making progress toward it is an outcome requiring separate evidence.
The Scientific Origins and Development of the Theory
Research on possible selves grew from cognitive and social approaches to the self that examined how people organize information about their attributes and roles. Earlier research emphasized relatively stable self-descriptions and self-schemas. Markus and Nurius expanded this account by locating anticipated identity within the current self-system. They proposed two broad functions: possible selves provide incentives for approaching or avoiding future outcomes and create a reference frame for evaluating the present self (Markus and Nurius, 1986).
Subsequent work tested whether future self-representations predicted achievement and behavioral regulation. This research repeatedly revealed an important distinction between identifying a desirable destination and having a usable roadmap. A person can sustain an optimistic self-image while making little progress. More effective motivational representations often incorporate a realistic sense of what can be done now, what might interfere, and how behavior connects to an identity that matters (Oyserman et al., 2004; Oyserman et al., 2006).
The contemporary field also draws from identity-based motivation, temporal self-continuity, self-regulation, and hope theory. These frameworks share concern with future-oriented behavior while investigating different mechanisms. Contemporary synthesis emphasizes that a favorable or vividly imagined future identity is one potentially useful ingredient rather than a universal mechanism sufficient to drive effort (Oyserman and Horowitz, 2023).
How Possible Selves Connect Identity to Present Action
Personal relevance and identity congruence
A possible self can guide behavior when it feels related to the immediate choice. A person imagining themselves as a caring parent may see attending to a child's needs as an expression of who they are becoming. A student who expects to enter university may interpret completing difficult assignments as part of becoming a university student. The mechanism involves the perceived fit between action and self-understanding, rather than pleasure in the task alone.
Identity-based motivation theory describes how situationally activated identities shape action readiness and the interpretation of difficulty. People are more likely to adopt strategies they experience as consistent with a valued identity. Difficulty may mean that the goal matters and demands persistence, or it may be interpreted as evidence that a path is unavailable to someone like them. Context influences which interpretation becomes salient (Oyserman and Destin, 2010; Oyserman and Horowitz, 2023).
Actionability and plausible strategies
An imagined future becomes more behaviorally useful when a person can specify intermediate steps. “I want to be a competent nurse” expresses a hoped-for identity; connecting it to coursework, supervised practice, feedback, and an achievable training route supplies a behavioral pathway. The possible self need not become a rigid schedule, but it must connect with decisions under the person's actual influence.
In research on academic futures, students' descriptions of possible identities were informative partly because researchers could examine whether those identities were linked to concrete strategies. Longitudinal evidence reviewed by O'Donnell and Oyserman (2023) supports a relationship between school-focused possible identities and subsequent academic outcomes. Their study also identified balance and plausibility as predictive features, while acknowledging that observational designs alone cannot establish the entire causal chain.
Accessibility, vividness, and perceived control
Future identities differ in accessibility: some come to mind easily during daily activity while others require deliberate reflection. They also differ in detail. In a study of important possible selves, availability, accessibility, and perceived control were associated with motivation to approach or avoid the envisioned identity. This supports a differentiated account of how a future representation becomes psychologically influential, although the study's sample and design limit broad causal generalization (Norman and Aron, 2003).
Vividness can make the imagined future concrete and emotionally engaging. Commitment may increase its practical importance. A theoretical review by Haskins and vanDellen (2019) discusses both routes while emphasizing that ideal possible selves sometimes support self-regulation and sometimes fail to do so. Vivid imagination should therefore be evaluated alongside feasibility, strategy, and ongoing feedback.
Interpretation of difficulty
One of the most important contributions of identity-based motivation research concerns the meaning of obstacles. An assignment that feels demanding can be interpreted as evidence of engagement in a worthwhile future. The same difficulty can suggest that one's desired identity is inaccessible. Neither interpretation is determined by the task alone. Social messages, institutional conditions, past experiences, and immediate cues can shift what effort means in relation to the self (Oyserman and Destin, 2010).
This mechanism also helps explain why encouraging people to picture success without considering their circumstances can be ineffective. An appealing future provides direction; sustained action requires that the person see a legitimate pathway and have meaningful opportunities to use it.
Possible Selves, Hope, Optimism, and Self-Efficacy
Possible selves overlap with several established constructs, but the distinctions clarify the mechanisms researchers measure. Possible selves concern the content of future identity: the kind of person one could become. Hope theory examines goals, perceived routes toward them, and the agency involved in pursuing those routes. Snyder's influential account distinguishes pathways thinking from agency thinking and treats hope as goal-directed cognition (Snyder, 2002). A person can hold a vivid hoped-for identity yet feel unable to identify routes toward it; another can imagine several routes while remaining uncertain about which future identity matters most.
Optimism refers more generally to positive expectations about future outcomes. A person may expect that circumstances will improve without representing a specific identity change. Self-efficacy refers to beliefs about one's capability to execute particular actions under relevant conditions. Someone can imagine becoming an accomplished musician while doubting their present ability to practice effectively, or can believe in their ability to perform a task without wanting the social identity attached to it. The encyclopedia's dedicated discussion of self-efficacy and action examines that capability belief in its own conceptual domain.
Self-esteem evaluates one's worth; possible selves concern anticipated identity. A future representation may support or threaten self-evaluation, especially when it implicates competence, belonging, or continuity. Yet wanting to become more accomplished does not itself establish low self-esteem, and fearing a particular future is not a diagnosis. A person can have stable self-regard while pursuing considerable change.
Hope, optimism, possible selves, and self-efficacy can interact constructively. A person might envision a meaningful future, believe it is attainable, identify multiple pathways, and consider themselves capable of initiating specific tasks. Researchers must measure each process separately before attributing an observed effect to any one of them.
Possible Selves and Future Self-Continuity
Future self-continuity describes the perceived connection between the person one is now and the person one expects to be later. Possible selves describe future identities; continuity describes how psychologically connected those future identities feel to the present. A distant future self may be elaborate but feel almost like another person. A comparatively modest future may feel continuous with familiar values, relationships, and commitments.
Research on temporal continuity examines the consequences for decisions involving present costs and delayed benefits. A review by Hershfield (2011) describes links between similarity, vividness, perceived future-self connection, and intertemporal choice. A broader synthesis by Sedikides et al. (2023) reviews present–future continuity alongside past–present and global continuity, noting differences across settings and benefits that sometimes arise from perceived discontinuity.
Continuity should not be idealized as an unconditional good. Leaving behind a harmful identity, recovering from an oppressive role, or recognizing that one can live differently may make discontinuity psychologically useful. The adaptive question is whether temporal identity supports flexible, valued action and an accurate relationship to one's circumstances.
The Psychological Role of Hoped-For and Feared Futures
Approach-oriented possible selves give personally meaningful form to desired outcomes. They can provide a reason to invest effort in education, relationships, work, health, and creative activity. Feared possible selves can highlight risks a person seeks to prevent. Together they establish a range of imagined futures that can make present decisions feel consequential.
Some educational studies operationalize balance as the coexistence of a positive and a negative identity in a relevant domain. For example, a student may hope to graduate and fear disengaging from school. Research suggests that such paired representations can be informative, particularly when accompanied by concrete strategies; balance should not be treated as a universal psychological requirement or a prescription to cultivate fear (O'Donnell and Oyserman, 2023).
Feared selves can motivate precaution when the threat feels credible and there are feasible means of responding. They may also promote avoidance, shame, rumination, or withdrawal when a feared outcome feels uncontrollable. Researchers therefore attend to emotional response, coping options, and perceived control. A frightening image that intensifies distress while offering no route toward safety may be counterproductive even if its content is vivid.
Possible selves are often plural and partly incompatible. A person may imagine becoming a devoted caregiver, geographically mobile professional, and deeply engaged artist while recognizing limits on time and energy. Motivation involves selecting, integrating, revising, and sometimes relinquishing futures. Psychological flexibility includes the capacity to reconsider an earlier image when knowledge, values, health, or opportunity changes.
Development Across the Life Span
Childhood and emerging future identity
Children's possible selves develop alongside their understanding of social roles, capacities, time, and causal pathways. Their imaginings are shaped by observed adults, stories, feedback, and the opportunities recognized in their environment. Developmental interpretation must account for changes in language, temporal reasoning, and the ability to distinguish wishes from likely outcomes. An imaginative answer should not automatically be scored as an unrealistic self-concept or an indicator of poor adjustment.
Adolescence, education, and identity exploration
Adolescence intensifies the relevance of schooling, peer relationships, social belonging, and anticipated adult roles. Academic possible selves can organize effort when students perceive educational activity as connected to their futures. In a longitudinal investigation, O'Donnell and Oyserman (2023) examined positive and negative school-focused future identities and linked strategies in relation to subsequent grades. The evidence supports the importance of how a future identity is structured and experienced, while leaving room for confounding influences and contextual mechanisms.
Students differ in exposure to credible role models, supportive institutions, economic resources, and expectations about who can enter particular professions. Future identity thus develops through social opportunities as well as individual imagination. An intervention focused exclusively on changing aspiration can miss institutional barriers that determine whether a pathway is accessible.
Emerging adulthood and major transitions
Educational choices, employment, intimate relationships, migration, and changes in family roles can reorganize the set of futures a person sees as possible. Some possible selves become more detailed as experience accumulates; others disappear or gain emotional force after success, rejection, or loss. When priorities conflict, people may renegotiate the meaning of achievement, security, belonging, and autonomy. A change in anticipated identity need not indicate instability or psychopathology; it can reflect learning and adaptation.
Midlife, later adulthood, and constrained possibilities
Possible selves remain relevant beyond adolescence. Adults may envision healthier routines, renewed relationships, professional changes, or forms of contribution after retirement. Aging can bring shifts in horizons, responsibilities, health, and perceived opportunity. An adaptive future identity may include continuity with cherished commitments as well as the acceptance of new limitations. Temporal self-continuity research emphasizes how assessments of one's past and future can matter for motivation across the life course (Sedikides et al., 2023).
Family, Culture, Social Class, and the Future Self
Possible selves reflect the cultural environments in which people learn what kinds of lives are desirable, respectable, achievable, or forbidden. Family expectations may emphasize stability, caregiving, achievement, independence, or collective responsibility. Peers can make particular identities salient through recognition and comparison. Schools and institutions communicate who appears to belong in a profession or educational pathway.
Perceived possibility is shaped by material opportunity. Financial insecurity, discrimination, educational access, family care duties, disability-related obstacles, and labor market conditions can make an imagined future more or less reachable. Identity-based motivation theory explains how cultural and class conditions influence which futures feel congruent with the self and how people interpret obstacles. Research on social class highlights the risk of mistakenly attributing structurally constrained outcomes entirely to personal character or effort (Fisher et al., 2017).
Cultural comparisons also require conceptual and measurement care. The meaning of an independent career, an interdependent family role, or an anticipated social obligation differs across communities. Researchers should determine whether measures translate validly and whether reported differences reflect lived contexts, response conventions, or genuine variation in self-representation. Possible selves can be individual and relational, and socially embedded futures are just as much part of identity as individual achievements.
Digital Environments and Images of a Future Self
Digital environments provide abundant representations of lifestyles, occupations, bodies, relationships, and achievements. These images may widen the range of futures people can envision and make social comparison unusually frequent. At the same time, selective presentation, visibility metrics, and algorithmic recommendation can distort expectations about typical outcomes, required resources, and routes to success.
Research on possible selves does not establish that exposure to idealized digital images always inspires or harms a person. Effects plausibly vary with the viewer's circumstances, social relationships, existing self-evaluation, and perceived capacity to act. The central scientific distinction concerns whether digital imagery develops informed, actionable identity possibilities or encourages disengaged comparison and repeated unattainable fantasies. Claims about specific platforms require platform-specific evidence.
The historical context of the Artificial Era adds further forms of mediated future imagination, including interactive AI-assisted planning and simulated life trajectories. These tools can prompt a human user to consider alternative roles, rehearse decisions, or articulate hopes and fears. The relevant psychological evidence concerns the human user's understanding, motivation, and behavior; the subjective status of an artificial system belongs to a distinct philosophical and scientific inquiry. Related questions of comparison and self-evaluation in that historical context are addressed in Self-Worth in the Artificial Era.
What the Empirical Research Actually Shows
Longitudinal relationships with academic achievement
Several studies report that academic possible selves, particularly when linked to feasible strategies, predict later educational involvement or achievement. In an early investigation, Oyserman et al. (2004) found support for the proposal that representations functioning as roadmaps were more closely related to academic change than hopeful images alone. O'Donnell and Oyserman (2023) further examined balance, plausibility, and language-based characteristics in samples of U.S. adolescents, finding predictive relationships with subsequent grade point averages.
Longitudinal prediction is valuable because the future outcome is measured after the proposed predictor. Yet it does not eliminate the possibility that previous success, socioeconomic conditions, personality, teaching quality, or supportive relationships influence both identity representation and achievement. Results from specific school populations require independent testing before universal generalization.
Experimental intervention evidence
Intervention research provides a more direct, though still context-dependent, test of causation. Oyserman et al. (2002) evaluated a nine-week small-group program that helped students envision adult futures and connect them to school participation. Their cohort comparison reported differences in several school-related outcomes, while its design limits the strength of causal inference. A later intervention study involving eighth graders reported improvements in academic and behavioral indicators with follow-up evidence after activities designed to link possible selves with strategies and a constructive interpretation of difficulty (Oyserman et al., 2006).
These findings justify interest in structured, contextualized possible-selves interventions. They do not justify promising the same outcomes in every school or assuming that the active ingredient is visualization alone. Programs combine several components, and delivery, setting, resources, and comparison groups affect what can be concluded.
Health behavior evidence
Future-oriented identities can relate to health behavior, but health outcomes introduce additional contingencies: access to care, habits, stress, symptoms, economic conditions, and environmental opportunity. A systematic review of adolescent health behavior studies examined fourteen studies and concluded that heterogeneous possible-self properties and inconsistent methodology made firm conclusions difficult. Some properties, including perceived likelihood and domain-relevant possible selves, appeared promising. This body of evidence is limited and does not establish that merely describing a healthy future self produces sustained health improvement.
Future-self continuity and decisions over time
Studies of intertemporal decision-making suggest that how people regard their future selves can influence willingness to incur present costs for future benefits. In a review, Hershfield (2011) considered evidence involving saving and other temporally extended choices. These findings concern future-self connectedness and related mechanisms rather than proving every claim made by possible-selves theory. Different operational definitions should not be treated as interchangeable.
Overall evidentiary judgment
Established: people can represent multiple hoped-for and feared future identities; these representations can be measured; their content and structure are associated with motivation and behavior in multiple research contexts. Supported with qualifications: some structured interventions have improved school-related outcomes, and future-self continuity can influence decisions with delayed consequences. Limited: exact mechanisms linking a particular imagined self to sustained behavior, cross-cultural generalization of specific measures, clinical applications, and long-term effects of brief visualization exercises. Contested or insufficiently resolved: whether vividness, positive emotional tone, closeness, fear, or a single gap score can independently and reliably predict action across contexts (Oyserman and Horowitz, 2023).
How Researchers Measure Possible Selves
Open-ended elicitation and coding
A common approach invites participants to describe who they expect, hope, and fear becoming during a specified period. Researchers may code responses by domain, emotional valence, perceived likelihood, specificity, perceived control, and links to strategies. Open-ended methods preserve individual meaning and can reveal futures that a predetermined questionnaire would miss. They require clear instructions, reliable coding, attention to participant language, and evidence that categories retain comparable meaning across populations.
A measure asking for possible selves “next year” captures a different time horizon from one asking about adulthood or old age. A list of anticipated careers may tell us little about a participant's future relational or moral identity. Researchers therefore need to describe how prompts shape responses before interpreting between-group differences.
Balance, plausibility, and linked strategies
Some studies assess whether positive and negative future identities coexist in a domain and whether participants specify strategies for attaining or avoiding them. The measures used by O'Donnell and Oyserman (2023) operationalized balance and plausibility in academic future identities and examined relations with subsequent grades. These operationalizations are designed for particular research questions; they are not universally standardized clinical assessments.
Rating scales and temporal self-continuity measures
Questionnaires can ask how vividly a future identity is imagined, how likely it seems, how valued it is, or how connected it feels to the present self. Such variables may capture separable aspects of the phenomenon. A future-self-continuity measure should not silently be renamed a possible-selves inventory, and an optimism scale should not be interpreted as directly measuring identity content.
Self-report measures are vulnerable to social desirability, recall limits, wording effects, and changing context. Researchers can strengthen inference by combining self-description with longitudinal observation, behavioral indicators, experimental manipulation, and preregistered analyses. Translation, age appropriateness, measurement invariance, and sampling also matter. A possible-selves score is a research observation, not evidence of a mental disorder or a stand-alone psychological diagnosis.
Possible Selves, Mental Health, and Psychological Well-Being
Future-oriented self-representation can accompany hope, worry, meaning, motivation, disappointment, and distress. Its psychological implications depend on content, flexibility, perceived control, and circumstances. A feared future may prompt planning for a realistic risk, yet repetitive and uncontrollable catastrophic projection may coincide with anxiety or avoidance. A hoped-for future may offer meaning, yet a rigid ideal that feels permanently inaccessible may intensify dissatisfaction or self-criticism.
These associations must be interpreted without reducing normal uncertainty to pathology. People living through unemployment, migration, illness, bereavement, or social transition can revise their expected identities dramatically. Such changes may be understandable responses to altered circumstances. Possible-selves research is primarily concerned with cognitive and motivational representations. Assessment of depressive, anxiety, trauma-related, or other disorders requires independent clinical criteria and qualified evaluation.
Positive future imagery can sometimes improve subjective outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of best possible self writing interventions found improvements in well-being, optimism, and positive affect relative to controls, while effects and designs varied. Best possible self exercises overlap with possible-selves theory but should be distinguished from structured interventions that make future identities actionable. Short-term changes in emotion cannot automatically be extrapolated to long-term identity change or clinical treatment efficacy.
When a person's future becomes narrowly dominated by hopelessness, danger, or expectations of failure, support may involve identifying immediate sources of safety, resources, emotional care, and realistic alternatives. Clinical treatment decisions depend on the underlying condition and individual needs, rather than on a possible-selves questionnaire score.
Evidence-Informed Ways to Work With Future Identity
Clarify the identity and its personal meaning
An individual may begin by describing one future they hope to inhabit and one they want to avoid, using language that identifies roles, values, relationships, or capabilities. The question is who this future self would be and why that identity matters. Genuine importance should be distinguished from external pressure to look successful. This is an exploratory method for clarifying self-representation, with effects on behavior dependent on subsequent action and context.
Test feasibility and structural opportunity
An envisioned future becomes more useful when its preconditions are examined. What educational access, money, social support, health accommodations, credentials, or institutional permissions are necessary? Which conditions are controllable, which require assistance, and which currently impose constraints? A realistic account of possibility respects the resources available to the person. It also allows goals to be revised without interpreting structural barriers as personal moral failures.
Translate identity into specific strategies
Concrete planning connects identity to behavior. Someone who imagines becoming a writer might establish a modest recurring writing practice, seek feedback, and revise work. A student imagining a scientific career might identify prerequisite coursework, mentors, and opportunities to conduct research. Studies of academic possible selves suggest the importance of credible action pathways (Oyserman et al., 2004; O'Donnell and Oyserman, 2023).
Planning research adjacent to possible-selves theory provides another useful perspective. A small randomized study by Duckworth et al. (2013) found academic benefits from a mental contrasting and implementation intentions exercise relative to positive thinking among fifth graders. This intervention asks participants to consider obstacles and specify if–then responses; it should be identified as its own self-regulatory method rather than relabeled as direct evidence that all possible-selves exercises are effective.
Interpret obstacles accurately and revise the roadmap
Difficulties can prompt changes to method, timing, support, or aspiration. The constructive question is whether a particular obstacle indicates a need for additional learning, a blocked opportunity, a mismatched strategy, or an unrealistic premise. Identity-based motivation research suggests that meaning assigned to difficulty can shape persistence (Oyserman and Destin, 2010). Reflection should preserve the ability to stop a harmful pursuit, change direction, and choose a different meaningful future.
Evaluate both emotional and behavioral outcomes
An exercise may produce greater hope, vividness, or optimism without improving attendance, sustained work, relationships, or other outcomes. Different goals call for different measures. Personal reflection can track whether an imagined identity remains meaningful and whether behavior has changed, while formal program evaluation should use suitable outcomes, comparison groups, and follow-up intervals. Emotional encouragement and demonstrated effectiveness are separate claims.
Limitations, Alternative Explanations, and Open Research Questions
Research on possible selves spans different theories, populations, domains, and outcome measures. Some investigators study a description of hoped-for future identity; others assess self-continuity, approach–avoidance balance, emotional vividness, or imagined futures in a specific educational or health context. Aggregating them without conceptual care can create apparent agreement where constructs differ. The integrative review by Oyserman and Horowitz (2023) explicitly identifies conflicting predictions across approaches and stresses the importance of processes that convert identity into action.
There are also selection effects. Students with supportive schools and successful prior performance may imagine achievable academic futures precisely because their environment provides evidence of success. Future identities may reinforce later achievement while also being shaped by earlier success. Longitudinal and experimental designs answer different questions, and study results from small or specific samples must be interpreted accordingly.
The field needs stronger evidence about the relative contribution of vividness, emotional tone, perceived likelihood, continuity, strategy links, and institutional opportunity. More diverse longitudinal samples, cross-cultural validation, transparent measurement, and careful analyses of differential intervention effects would improve generalizability. Ethical program design should avoid turning an individual motivational theory into a claim that people can overcome any barrier through visualization or effort.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an example of a possible self?
A university student who pictures becoming a research psychologist, imagines the education and activities associated with that role, and regards it as a future version of themselves has a hoped-for possible self. A feared counterpart could be becoming disengaged from meaningful learning. These representations become more practically informative when connected to specific options and steps available now.
Can people have several possible selves at the same time?
Yes. A person's future identity can include occupational, relational, moral, health-related, creative, and community roles. Different futures may coexist, support one another, or compete for limited resources. Their configuration can change during major life transitions (Markus and Nurius, 1986).
Are possible selves the same as the ideal self?
The ideal self emphasizes personally valued characteristics or standards, while possible selves comprise a wider collection of anticipated identities, including desired, expected, and feared futures. An ideal self can be represented as one possible self, but the two concepts address different ranges of psychological content.
Do feared possible selves increase motivation?
They can make risk personally salient, especially when the person sees feasible actions that might prevent it. They can also intensify distress or avoidance when a feared outcome appears inevitable. The influence depends on perceived control, strategy, social environment, and how the future identity is interpreted.
Does visualizing a successful future improve performance?
Visualization alone offers no universal performance guarantee. Some structured school interventions that linked future identity to strategies improved educational outcomes; brief best-possible-self exercises have shown average benefits for certain well-being outcomes. These intervention classes, outcomes, and study designs differ (Oyserman et al., 2006; Carrillo et al., 2019).
What is the difference between a possible self and a goal?
A goal specifies an outcome or desired state of affairs; a possible self represents a future identity. “Complete a certification” is a goal. “Become a trusted, competent professional who uses that certification responsibly” is a possible self. The two may reinforce each other when a goal offers a route toward a meaningful future identity.
Can a possible self change during adulthood?
Yes. Work transitions, relationships, changes in health, new responsibilities, and revised priorities can reorganize imagined identities. A person may preserve important values while changing the roles through which those values are expressed. Future identity is responsive to experience and opportunity across the life span.
Is having an uncertain future identity a mental health disorder?
No. Possible selves are normal psychological representations, and uncertainty about them is common during transitions. Clinical symptoms or disorders require their own assessment criteria. Neither the content of a possible self nor a single research questionnaire identifies a psychiatric diagnosis.
Conclusion
Possible selves give a future-facing structure to self-knowledge. They explain why imagined identities can make some present choices personally significant and why people approach, avoid, revise, or relinquish anticipated futures. Their psychological influence emerges through the interaction of identity relevance, emotional meaning, perceived feasibility, social context, and usable action pathways. The research supports studying possible selves as a major connection between identity and motivation, while requiring careful separation of future imagination, measured associations, causal intervention effects, and the actual conditions that make change possible.
Related Articles
Cluster Self-Concept, Identity and Self-Esteem — a wider scientific account of self-representation, personal identity, and self-evaluation.
Self-Efficacy: How Belief in Your Ability Shapes Action — research on task-specific capability beliefs that can connect future identity to action.
Self-Worth in the Artificial Era: Ability, Comparison, Status, and AI — analysis of changing standards of human evaluation in technologically mediated environments.
Self-Discrepancy Theory: Actual, Ideal, and Ought Selves — Explain actual, ideal, and ought self-guides, their emotional predictions, and competing evidence.
Self-Complexity Theory: Self-Aspects, Stress, and Emotional Outcomes — Examine distinct self-aspects, their interdependence, and research on stress and emotional spillover.
Self-Concept Clarity: Why a Coherent Sense of Self Matters — Examine the clarity, coherence, and stability of self-beliefs, including research and measurement limits.
Self-Image vs. Self-Concept: Psychological Differences and Overlap — Compare mental images, organized self-beliefs, and self-evaluation with concrete examples.
Personal Identity in Psychology: Continuity, Roles, and the Sense of Self — Define personal identity through continuity, commitments, personal characteristics, and changing social roles.
Self-Esteem in Psychology: Definition, Types, and Evidence — Define global self-esteem, domain evaluations, and trait and state distinctions using scientific research.
References
Carrillo, A., Rubio-Aparicio, M., Molinari, G., Enrique, Á., Sánchez-Meca, J., and Baños, R. M. (2019). Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0222386. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222386
Corte, C., Lee, C.-K., Stein, K. F., and Raszewski, R. (2022). Possible selves and health behavior in adolescents: A systematic review. Self and Identity, 21(1), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1788137
Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Gollwitzer, A., and Oettingen, G. (2013). From fantasy to action: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) improves academic performance in children. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613476307
Fisher, O., O’Donnell, S. C., and Oyserman, D. (2017). Social class and identity-based motivation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.035
Haskins, L. B., and vanDellen, M. R. (2019). Self-regulation as relating to one's ideal possible self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(10), e12499. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12499
Hershfield, H. E. (2011). Future self-continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06201.x
Markus, H., and Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
Norman, C. C., and Aron, A. (2003). Aspects of possible self that predict motivation to achieve or avoid it. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00029-5
O'Donnell, S. C., and Oyserman, D. (2023). Apt and actionable possible identities matter: The case of academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 95(2), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12118
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., and Terry, K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., Terry, K., and Hart-Johnson, T. (2004). Possible selves as roadmaps. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00057-6
Oyserman, D., and Destin, M. (2010). Identity-based motivation: Implications for intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(7), 1001–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010374775
Oyserman, D., and Horowitz, E. (2023). From possible selves and future selves to current action: An integrated review and identity-based motivation synthesis. Advances in Motivation Science, 10, 73–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2022.11.003
Oyserman, D., Terry, K., and Bybee, D. (2002). A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 25(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2002.0474
Sedikides, C., Hong, E. K., and Wildschut, T. (2023). Self-continuity. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-032236
Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01
Vignoles, V. L., Manzi, C., Regalia, C., Jemmolo, S., and Scabini, E. (2008). Identity motives underlying desired and feared possible future selves. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1165–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00518.x