Parent-adolescent conflict refers to disagreements between adolescents and their parents or caregivers about behavior, authority, personal decisions, responsibilities, values, and relationships. These disagreements can be brief and negotiable or persistent and emotionally harmful. Their developmental meaning depends on what is disputed, how often it occurs, how family members treat one another, and whether the relationship can be repaired. A disagreement over a curfew has different implications from ongoing intimidation, hostility, or fear. Conflict frequency, intensity, and resolution must therefore be evaluated separately. Smetana and Rote, 2019
The central developmental task is renegotiating independence while maintaining reliable connection. Adolescents acquire broader experience, developing judgment, and expanding social responsibilities. Parents continue to provide guidance, resources, and safety-related boundaries. Arguments often emerge when parents and adolescents disagree about the location of that boundary. Constructive conflict resolution creates opportunities to clarify expectations, participate in decisions, protect safety, and revise arrangements as competence and circumstances change. National Academies, 2019
Defining Parent-Adolescent Conflict
A disagreement becomes conflict when participants perceive incompatible goals, demands, or claims to authority. A teenager might request to attend a social event while a caregiver worries about transport or supervision. One person may experience the exchange as a reasonable discussion, while the other experiences an accusation or loss of trust. The disagreement's observable content and its interpersonal meaning can differ substantially. Research distinguishes the conflict event from the broader security and quality of the relationship. Smetana and Rote, 2019
Conflict frequency measures the rate of disagreement; affective intensity measures the emotional force of those disputes. Researchers also assess topics, strategies of resolution, feelings of fairness, and outcomes for family members. These dimensions can move in different directions. Families may argue less often but find remaining disagreements more intense; another family may openly discuss difficult matters without losing trust or respect. Assessments that reduce conflict to a single count can miss these distinctions. Laursen, Coy, and Collins, 1998
Conflict is a relational process, not a diagnostic category. Neither the number of arguments nor an adolescent's willingness to challenge a rule establishes a psychological disorder. At the same time, persistent fear, coercion, violence, and severe interference with daily functioning call for assessment and protection rather than ordinary communication advice. Interpretation requires the circumstances of the adolescent and the actions of everyone involved.
Why Parents and Adolescents Disagree
Changing autonomy and authority
Adolescents increasingly seek authority over clothing, friendships, recreation, schoolwork, transportation, digital communication, money, and future plans. Parents may accept that growing capacity while remaining concerned about consequences beyond the adolescent's experience. Conflict follows when both parties recognize the same decision but disagree about who should control it. This struggle can be understood through social domain theory, which studies beliefs about the legitimacy and boundaries of authority. Smetana and Asquith, 1994
Social domain theory differentiates moral matters involving harm and rights; conventional matters involving coordination and shared practices; prudential matters involving health and safety; and personal matters involving individual choice. Everyday decisions frequently cross these domains. An evening outing can involve personal freedom, transport, risk exposure, and family scheduling. A parent and adolescent may agree that safety matters while assigning the personal and safety components different weights. Recognizing the combination of concerns provides a more accurate basis for negotiation. Smetana, 1995
Research on changing conceptions of parental authority suggests that adolescents often view strong parental regulation of strictly personal decisions differently from rules concerning welfare or responsibility. The context of a limit affects whether it is experienced as guidance or excessive psychological control. A restriction on unsafe driving can have a clearer prudential basis than insisting on a particular hairstyle. An age-appropriate role in making personal decisions may support adjustment and cooperation, with important differences among individuals and families. Smetana, Crean, and Campione-Barr, 2005
Mismatched meanings and assumptions
Family members may interpret the same behavior through different expectations. A request for location information may communicate care to a parent and distrust to an adolescent. Closing a bedroom door may mean needing concentration to the teenager and rejecting contact to a parent. Escalation becomes more likely when an interpretation of motives is treated as established fact. Asking what an action meant can resolve part of a disagreement before the substantive rule is discussed. Smetana and Rote, 2019
Families also manage unequal information. Adolescents know details of their peer relationships and online exchanges that parents may not see. Caregivers know financial, legal, and practical constraints that teenagers may not anticipate. Constructive discussions distinguish information necessary for a responsible decision from disclosures that intrude unnecessarily into personal experience. This distinction can become especially important when trust has been damaged by earlier conflicts.
Identity, values, and belonging
Exploring values, interests, beliefs, friendships, social identities, and future possibilities is part of adolescent development. A disagreement about academic direction, clothing, a friendship, religious practice, or social affiliation can carry significance beyond the immediate choice. Adolescents may experience such decisions as expressions of belonging or emerging agency; caregivers may experience them through commitments, expectations, and responsibilities developed over many years. These meanings can make otherwise small disputes emotionally consequential. Smetana, Campione-Barr, and Metzger, 2006
Disagreement over identity exploration does not itself constitute a crisis or disorder. Likewise, compliance does not prove psychological security. Relevant developmental questions concern the freedom to consider options, the ability to articulate reasons, access to reliable relationships, and the consequences of family responses. The meaning of an identity-related dispute differs across cultural and social settings.
Stress, resources, and circumstances
Academic pressure, work schedules, caregiving duties, financial strain, overcrowding, migration, illness, discrimination, and sleep disruption can reduce the time and attention available for patient discussion. An argument may arise around household tasks while reflecting strain in the wider family environment. Explaining conflict exclusively through adolescent personality or puberty obscures these contributors. The National Academies' consensus review emphasizes the influence of family, schools, communities, and unequal resources on developmental opportunity. National Academies, 2019
Rules created for an earlier stage of childhood can become sources of repeated conflict when circumstances change without discussion. Conversely, adolescents may request independence before expectations about responsibilities have been specified. Periodic negotiation allows parents and adolescents to identify outdated arrangements and agree on realistic obligations before conflict intensifies.
Developmental Trajectories: Early, Middle, and Later Adolescence
Early adolescence
Early adolescence frequently involves changing social expectations, educational transitions, expanding awareness of personal choice, and bodily development. Family routines designed for younger children may need revision. Adolescents can begin questioning rules they formerly accepted while caregivers adjust their understanding of competence and risk. This creates opportunities for disagreements about personal jurisdiction. These trends describe possible contextual changes, not a universal phase of rebellion. National Academies, 2019
Middle adolescence
In middle adolescence, peer relationships, mobility, growing responsibilities, and more consequential choices can make disputes feel emotionally important. Families may begin negotiating issues that previously had straightforward parental answers. Variation remains substantial: some families establish efficient negotiation early; others struggle with persistent mistrust or unstable circumstances. The emotional intensity of remaining conflicts should be assessed independently from their frequency. Laursen, Coy, and Collins, 1998
Later adolescence
Later adolescence often involves decisions about education, employment, finances, relationships, and living arrangements. Parents and young people may increasingly negotiate as persons with overlapping but distinguishable responsibilities. This transition can expand reciprocity without erasing practical dependencies or legally defined authority. Longitudinal studies of conflict resolution identify changes compatible with a more symmetrical relationship in some samples, while reporting different patterns for parents and adolescents. Van Doorn, Branje, and Meeus, 2011
Does conflict increase during the teenage years?
An influential meta-analysis by Laursen, Coy, and Collins tested the common claim that parent-adolescent conflict rises and then falls in an adolescent peak. Across available studies, conflict frequency and combined conflict indices tended to decrease with age, while negative emotional affect increased from early to middle adolescence. The evidence concerning puberty was more limited. The analysis provided little support for a universal inverted-U trajectory. It also showed why the rate of disagreements and their emotional quality must be treated as distinct outcomes. Laursen, Coy, and Collins, 1998
This finding does not mean that every teenager will argue less as time passes. Meta-analytic averages aggregate families with different relationship histories, social environments, and developmental timing. Some adolescents face serious ongoing conflict; some families experience very little. Population trends offer context for inquiry, not a prediction about a particular household.
The Psychology of Escalation
Emotion and reciprocal feedback
Conflict involves responses from multiple people, each affecting what happens next. A worried caregiver asks increasingly insistent questions; the adolescent interprets them as suspicion and responds sharply; the caregiver sees the sharp response as justification for tighter control. The cycle may continue even when both originally wanted a safe and successful outcome. Daily-diary research has found reciprocal relationships between anger and conflict across days within parent-adolescent pairs, consistent with processes in which distress is both an antecedent and a consequence of further disagreement. LoBraico et al., 2020
Responsibility is not symmetrical simply because interaction is reciprocal. Adults have greater power and an obligation to maintain safety. A developmental account must not shift responsibility for intimidation, violence, or abuse onto the adolescent. Identifying reciprocal patterns is useful for ordinary disputes where everyone can safely participate.
Regulation, timing, and interpretation
Strong emotion can narrow attention to perceived threats and make hostile interpretations more readily available. Participants may interrupt, repeat accusations, or import memories of previous conflicts. A pause may help when both understand that the discussion will resume at a defined time. Avoidance that leaves the issue permanently unresolved has different effects from a time-limited effort to regain composure. Research on adolescent-parent relationships emphasizes emotional variability and flexibility rather than reducing family functioning to average anger levels alone. Smetana and Rote, 2019
The useful distinction is between managing emotion and silencing disagreement. A young person can legitimately disagree while remaining respectful. A parent can maintain a safety boundary while acknowledging frustration. Families learn more from repeated demonstrations of that balance than from a single rule about always speaking calmly.
Accumulated grievances and trust
Conflict often carries a history. A missed message may be interpreted through prior experiences of broken agreements, excessive questioning, perceived unfairness, or unreliable follow-through. If each side expects hostility, neutral actions can appear threatening. Repair requires attention to the specific decision and to the accumulated meaning of earlier interactions. Trust is rebuilt through consistency, predictable expectations, and a fair response when someone admits a mistake.
Information sharing illustrates this issue. If an adolescent anticipates disproportionate punishment for disclosure, the incentive to be forthcoming may weaken. If parents receive repeated inaccurate assurances about safety, they may find it difficult to loosen supervision. Good agreements therefore specify which information is essential and what will follow a breach, while preserving appropriate areas of personal privacy. Smetana, 2024
Learned interaction patterns
Conflict styles develop within a wider family environment. Longitudinal research has found that parents' ways of resolving conflict with one another predict some later resolution styles in parent-adolescent interactions. Other longitudinal work has identified associations between family conflict strategies and adolescents' subsequent conflict behavior in friendships. These results are compatible with social learning and continuity across relationships, although they remain open to shared-context explanations and other confounding factors. Van Doorn, Branje, and Meeus, 2007 Van Doorn and colleagues, 2011
Adults provide a repeated model of disagreement through how they make requests, respond to criticism, acknowledge error, and treat other family members. A caregiver who can revise an unfair accusation communicates that authority includes accountability. Such modeling is an observable relationship practice, not an assurance that all conflict will disappear.
Conflict Resolution Styles
Positive problem solving
Positive problem solving involves identifying the precise issue, listening to relevant concerns, generating alternatives, checking consequences, and agreeing on an implementable plan. Parents can preserve limits grounded in safety while giving adolescents meaningful control over negotiable decisions. For example, a request to attend an event can lead to discussion of transport, contact arrangements, return time, and what should happen if circumstances change.
A four-wave longitudinal study followed 314 young adolescents and their parents and assessed positive problem solving, conflict engagement, and withdrawal. Adolescents reported increasing positive problem solving with mothers but no comparable overall change with fathers; parents' reports displayed different trajectories. These differences show that changes in family negotiation cannot be represented by one universal curve. Van Doorn, Branje, and Meeus, 2011
Hostile engagement
Hostile engagement includes escalating accusations, contempt, threats, humiliation, and framing every disagreement as a contest for dominance. Such behavior may produce silence or immediate compliance without resolving the underlying problem. Research distinguishing types of conflict resolution suggests that patterns of engagement matter for adjustment alongside the frequency of disagreement; observational findings should not be treated as proof that changing a single behavior will prevent every difficulty. Branje and colleagues, 2009
A firm boundary can be communicated without insults or intimidation. When a disagreement involves threats, physical aggression, severe control, or fear, safety assessment takes priority over techniques for conducting a fair argument. Young people experiencing abuse should have access to trusted adults and appropriate protection services.
Withdrawal and avoidance
Withdrawal can represent an effort to regain composure, a preference for private reflection, fear, or a habitual avoidance of difficult topics. Its meaning depends on what happens next. A brief pause followed by renewed conversation may serve a constructive purpose. Repeated silence without any return to the problem may leave the conflict unresolved. The four-wave study found variations in withdrawal across mothers, fathers, and adolescents, reinforcing the need to understand the specific relationship. Van Doorn, Branje, and Meeus, 2011
Accommodation and compromise
Yielding on a low-stakes preference may support cooperation. Compromise is useful when both parties can make meaningful concessions without endangering safety or dignity. Yet submission caused by fear is psychologically different from voluntary accommodation. The adult's greater authority gives the caregiver special responsibility to distinguish negotiated agreement from enforced silence.
A Practical Process for Resolving Disagreement
First: define the actual decision
Specify what is being negotiated. 'Can I attend a particular gathering on Saturday?' creates a workable question; 'You never trust me' may refer to many episodes that require separate discussion. Parents can clarify what information they need to decide responsibly. Adolescents can explain the practical purpose of their request. Identifying the decision prevents global judgments about character from taking over.
Second: distinguish personal choice from safety
Identify which components involve individual taste or identity, which require coordination, and which concern genuine safety or other people's rights. A caregiver might need a transportation plan without needing to control every aspect of the adolescent's social preferences. The social-domain approach is helpful because a single conflict often contains multiple kinds of claims to authority. Smetana and Asquith, 1994
Third: exchange information and interests
Each participant states the goal beneath their position. The adolescent may value friendship and agency; the parent may be managing safety, finances, or responsibilities to others. Listening includes checking that the other's position has been understood before proposing a counterargument. When a teenager provides information about the setting or the parent's practical constraints become clear, an apparent conflict of principle may become a solvable coordination problem.
Fourth: create a specific agreement
The agreement should name observable expectations: who arranges transport, when contact is needed, which responsibilities must be met, and what to do if plans change. Vague requirements such as 'be mature' or 'stop being difficult' are hard to follow and assess. Predictable responses to breaches are more useful than penalties improvised in anger. These steps are evidence-informed applications of developmental and relationship science; they should not be presented as a universally validated treatment protocol.
Fifth: repair emotional harm
Reaching a practical decision may leave hurt feelings unaddressed. Repair can require acknowledging an unfair accusation, apologizing for a disrespectful remark, clarifying intentions, and returning to ordinary warmth. The parent and adolescent can each identify behavior they will change. Trust improves through repeated follow-through, especially when earlier agreements have failed.
Sixth: review the rule as circumstances change
Reassessment communicates that family expectations are responsive to growth. A rule that was sensible at twelve may be unnecessary or need modification at sixteen; a new environment may introduce different risks even for an older adolescent. A scheduled review lets family members evaluate actual competence and practical conditions before the next crisis occurs. National Academies, 2019
Everyday Conflict Topics
Curfews, travel, and peer gatherings
Discussions about going out typically combine freedom, social belonging, transportation, supervision, and local risk. Families can separate those components. A parent may maintain a firm safety requirement while leaving the adolescent room to choose an event or propose a credible route home. Decisions should reflect actual circumstances, not a general stereotype of teenage irrationality.
Schoolwork and responsibilities
Homework disagreements can reflect competing expectations, unclear instructions, overloaded schedules, sleep loss, or difficulty organizing tasks. Before increasing reminders, parents can ask what prevents progress. An agreement may involve a realistic work plan, access to support, and predictable household expectations. Where persistent academic impairment suggests a learning, attention, or mental-health concern, qualified assessment belongs to the relevant specialist rather than to a conflict label.
Phones, privacy, and online activity
Digital arguments involve multiple interests: safety, school participation, friendships, identity, privacy, and parental accountability. Supervising a genuine risk differs from demanding unrestricted access to every conversation. Family rules should specify when location or communication information is necessary and how a safety concern will be handled. Research on adolescent information management emphasizes the role of disclosure, concealment, perceived legitimacy, and caregiver responses. Smetana, 2024
There is no single developmental effect of digital media that resolves these questions for every household. Risks and benefits depend on the activity, social context, individual vulnerability, and platform conditions. Decisions should focus on the specific issue rather than on universal claims that screens are inherently beneficial or harmful.
Friendships, identity, and values
Parents may be concerned about a peer group's influence, while adolescents may experience criticism of their friends as criticism of their judgment or belonging. It is useful to discuss observable behavior and concrete risks rather than assign global labels to peers. Differences in values or life plans deserve substantive conversation. Greater autonomy does not require the loss of family connection or shared obligations. Smetana, Campione-Barr, and Metzger, 2006
Chores, money, and family schedules
Shared responsibilities are affected by schoolwork, caregiver employment, health needs, family size, and available resources. Agreements should account for those conditions and distribute work in a way that can be explained and reviewed. A disagreement over chores may be primarily about coordination or fairness, rather than an adolescent's general character.
Family, Culture, and Individual Variation
Different relationships within one family
The same adolescent can have different patterns of disagreement with different caregivers. Time together, role expectations, communication history, and responsibility for specific decisions influence how conflict unfolds. Longitudinal findings comparing mothers and fathers should be interpreted in relation to the sample and family structures studied, rather than turned into rigid gender rules. Van Doorn, Branje, and Meeus, 2011
Culture and family obligation
Families differ in values concerning interdependence, respect, authority, and individual preference. Research on adolescent autonomy cautions against treating cultures as internally uniform. A teenager can pursue independent judgment while valuing obligation to relatives, collective decisions, and reciprocal care. The meaning of 'respect' or 'privacy' needs to be understood in the family's lived social context. Smetana, 2002
Inequality, migration, disability, and adversity
Family tension may reflect financial pressures, unstable housing, discrimination, displacement, medical needs, sensory demands, or barriers to communication. Expectations should be calibrated to real opportunities and available support. A delayed task can arise from exhaustion or executive-function difficulty rather than simple refusal. Adolescents with disabilities or different neurodevelopmental profiles still require meaningful participation and dignity. A developmental model must consider these conditions without converting difference into pathology. National Academies, 2019
Conflict, Well-Being, and Mental Health
Association with depressive symptoms
A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis published in 2025 combined 46 studies, 31,147 participants, and 157 effect sizes. Parent-adolescent conflict was positively associated with depressive mood, with an overall correlation of r = .267. Cross-sectional results showed a stronger association (r = .320) than longitudinal results (r = .227), and the estimates varied across measurement instruments and publication years. These findings support attention to distressing family relationships but do not demonstrate that a particular argument causes depression. Wang and Tang, 2025
Multiple explanations are plausible. Family hostility may contribute to emotional distress; depressive symptoms may affect irritability, energy, and interactions; outside pressures may influence both. Reciprocal pathways may operate within the same family. Cross-sectional measurement cannot establish temporal ordering, while longitudinal analyses remain vulnerable to unmeasured confounding. Associations at the group level cannot substitute for an individualized clinical assessment.
Why resolution style matters
A study of 1,313 Dutch adolescents found distinct patterns of conflict resolution associated with different adjustment profiles. Its person-centered findings show why measuring frequency alone is incomplete. They also illustrate the limits of relying on self-report and observational associations for causal claims. Branje and colleagues, 2009
Recognizing concerning patterns
Professional assessment is appropriate when disputes repeatedly cause severe distress or interfere with school, relationships, safety, or ordinary functioning. Threats, coercion, intimidation, physical aggression, and isolation require safeguarding attention. If an adolescent shows persistent mood changes, severe functional decline, or other concerning symptoms, assessment should address the full clinical picture. Conflict is one contextual factor, not a diagnosis. Immediate danger or suicidal intent requires urgent local emergency or crisis assistance.
Evidence and Research Limitations
Cross-sectional studies estimate associations at a particular point in time. They cannot establish which process came first and may conflate age differences with family or cohort differences. Surveys depend on the perspective of the respondent. Parents and adolescents may report the same relationship differently because they have unequal roles, expectations, and access to information. The discrepancy itself may carry meaning.
Longitudinal research follows participants and can examine developmental trajectories and temporal sequences. Yet stable third variables, participant dropout, differences in measurement, and changes in family circumstances complicate causal interpretation. Four-wave studies help illuminate changes in resolution styles but should not be generalized automatically beyond the populations observed. Van Doorn, Branje, and Meeus, 2011
Daily-diary designs reveal within-family fluctuations and possible feedback loops over shorter intervals. Observational approaches can measure conversation patterns but may be influenced by being watched. Qualitative research clarifies how families interpret fairness, obligation, dignity, and authority. Experimental and intervention designs are needed to test whether a specific strategy changes outcomes. Evidence from interventions designed for a clinical condition cannot simply be transferred to ordinary developmental conflict.
Implications for Adolescents, Caregivers, and Professionals
Caregivers can begin by stating concerns precisely, listening to the adolescent's explanation, distinguishing personal choices from genuine safety issues, and setting limits that can be justified. They can invite meaningful proposals and revise agreements as circumstances change. Warmth and accountability outside conflicts shape how specific rules are received. Respectful boundaries are compatible with clear consequences and with an adult's responsibility for safety. National Academies, 2019
Adolescents can make productive participation more likely by describing the change they seek, presenting relevant facts, identifying practical responsibilities, and proposing how an agreement will be honored. Challenging a decision respectfully can be part of developing agency. When discussion is unsafe or repeatedly degrading, seeking support from another trusted adult or qualified professional is appropriate.
Educators and clinicians should examine family interactions in the context of school demands, identity development, cultural expectations, disability, financial constraints, and access to support. Useful questions concern the pattern of interaction, who has decision-making power, what each person understands about the issue, and whether harm or impairment is present. Referral for specialized clinical evaluation should follow actual symptoms and risk, not assumptions that normal disagreement indicates disorder.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is arguing with parents normal during adolescence?
Disagreement over rules, responsibilities, and autonomy occurs in many families. Its occurrence alone does not establish an unhealthy relationship. The topic, emotional intensity, mutual respect, and capacity for repair matter more than a simple count of arguments. Laursen, Coy, and Collins, 1998
Does puberty always increase family conflict?
Research does not support a universal increase followed by a decrease. The major meta-analysis found declining average conflict frequency across adolescence and more limited evidence of rising negative affect. Puberty contributes to a changing developmental context but is not a sufficient explanation for every disagreement. Laursen, Coy, and Collins, 1998
Should parents try to prevent every disagreement?
Families benefit from constructive ways to handle legitimate differences of perspective. The practical aims are safety, clear expectations, meaningful participation, and repair. Concealed fear or coerced silence should never be confused with successful resolution.
What if a teenager refuses to discuss the issue?
Ask whether the adolescent needs time, privacy, a clearer question, or a different conversation setting. A defined pause followed by an agreed return can help. Persistent withdrawal associated with fear, marked distress, or deteriorating functioning requires closer attention.
How can trust be restored after repeated conflict?
Trust usually depends on consistent behavior: agreements that are understandable, fair responses to mistakes, acknowledgement of harm, and observable follow-through. Parents should model accountability, while adolescents should have opportunities to demonstrate responsibility as they gain independence.
When might family counseling be useful?
Qualified support can be helpful when persistent disputes interfere substantially with relationships or functioning, when attempts at repair repeatedly fail, or when coexisting clinical concerns need evaluation. Where abuse or coercive control is present, safe assessment and protection take priority; joint negotiation may be inappropriate until safety has been addressed.
Related Articles
Parent-Child Communication: Listening, Repair, and Development — Communication, listening, and restoring trust.
Parenting Discipline: Boundaries, Consequences, and Development — Predictable boundaries and proportionate consequences.
Parenting Styles: Authoritative, Authoritarian, Permissive, and Uninvolved — Broader parenting approaches and research evidence.
Parental Anxiety and Overprotective Parenting: Child Autonomy and Risk — The relationship of anxiety and overprotection to developing independence.
Emotion Regulation in Adolescence: Development and Challenges — Emotional processes relevant to disagreement and repair.
Adolescent Autonomy Development: Independence, Decision-Making, and Support
Parent-Teen Relationships: Attachment, Trust, and Changing Roles
Parental Monitoring and Adolescent Privacy: Evidence and Boundaries
How Parents Can Support a Teenager's Identity Development
References
Branje, S. J. T., Van Doorn, M., Van der Valk, I., and Meeus, W. (2009). Parent–adolescent conflicts, conflict resolution types, and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.004
Laursen, B., Coy, K. C., and Collins, W. A. (1998). Reconsidering changes in parent-child conflict across adolescence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 69, 817–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06245.x
LoBraico, E. J., Brinberg, M., Ram, N., and Fosco, G. M. (2020). Exploring processes in day-to-day parent-adolescent conflict and angry mood: Evidence for circular causality. Family Process, 59(4), 1706–1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12506
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). The Promise of Adolescence: Realizing Opportunity for All Youth. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25388
Smetana, J. G. (1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00872.x
Smetana, J. G. (2002). Culture, autonomy, and personal jurisdiction in adolescent-parent relationships. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 29, 51–87. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11957575/
Smetana, J. G. (2024). Parenting and adolescent information management from the social-cognitive domain theory perspective. In The Cambridge Handbook of Parental Monitoring and Information Management during Adolescence. Cambridge University Press
Smetana, J. G., and Asquith, P. (1994). Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority and personal autonomy. Child Development, 65, 1147–1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00809.x
Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., and Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190124
Smetana, J. G., Crean, H. F., and Campione-Barr, N. (2005). Adolescents' and parents' changing conceptions of parental authority. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 108, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.126
Smetana, J. G., and Rote, W. M. (2019). Adolescent–parent relationships: Progress, processes, and prospects. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1, 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084903
Van Doorn, M. D., Branje, S. J. T., and Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Longitudinal transmission of conflict resolution styles from marital relationships to adolescent-parent relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.426
Van Doorn, M. D., Branje, S. J. T., and Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Developmental changes in conflict resolution styles in parent–adolescent relationships: A four-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9516-7
Van Doorn, M. D., Branje, S. J. T., and Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Longitudinal spillover effects of conflict resolution styles between adolescent-parent relationships and adolescent friendships. Journal of Family Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022289
Wang, Y., and Tang, W. (2025). The association between parent-adolescent conflicts and depressive mood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychology, 13, 1044. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03021-3