Understanding Men's Body Image
Men's body image is the multidimensional way men perceive, interpret, evaluate, feel about, and respond to their bodies and physical appearance. It encompasses muscularity, body fat, height, size, shape, fitness, facial features, hair, aging, and visible physical differences. A man may be satisfied with one aspect and distressed about another; he may appreciate his body's capabilities while experiencing pressure to change its appearance. Men's body image is shaped by personal history, embodiment, social relationships, cultural expectations, media environments, and experiences of acceptance or exclusion. The scientific question is how those factors influence psychological well-being, behaviors, and functioning over time.
Research increasingly recognizes the distinctive importance of a lean and muscular ideal in many men's appearance concerns. A muscularity-oriented ideal commonly combines visible muscle size, definition, low body fat, and an athletic silhouette. These characteristics can become standards against which ordinary bodies are judged, yet men's concerns also extend to thinness, weight, height, hair, skin, genital appearance, and perceived attractiveness. The evidence supports assessing these domains separately rather than assuming that muscularity accounts for every man's experience. In a study of college men, dissatisfaction with muscularity, body fat, and height contributed information about psychological well-being beyond drive for muscularity alone (Bergeron and Tylka, 2007).
The central distinction is between an appearance preference, dissatisfaction, and clinically significant distress. Wanting to build strength or change one's hairstyle may be personally meaningful and compatible with good well-being. Persistent shame, restrictive routines, social avoidance, compulsive checking, or substantial interference with work, relationships, or health indicates a different level of concern and merits individualized assessment. There is no appearance, weight, muscle size, or height that by itself determines mental health or establishes a psychiatric diagnosis.
The Scientific Architecture of Male Body Image
Perception, evaluation, emotion, and behavior
The perceptual dimension concerns how a person experiences the body's size, proportions, and visible characteristics. The cognitive-evaluative dimension includes beliefs about attractiveness, adequacy, normality, and self-worth. Emotional responses may include satisfaction, appreciation, pride, anxiety, embarrassment, or shame. Behavioral manifestations include clothing choices, exercise, grooming, checking, reassurance seeking, concealment, dietary regulation, and social participation. These dimensions interact: a belief about looking insufficiently muscular can influence attention to mirrors and comparisons, which can then reinforce the belief.
A multidimensional model also recognizes positive body image. Body appreciation involves respect for the body, the capacity to recognize its qualities, and a less exclusively appearance-based evaluation of self-worth. Men may develop positive body image without approving of every feature of their appearance. This enables research to distinguish reduced dissatisfaction from the development of appreciation, flexible behavior, and participation in valued activities. The Body Appreciation Scale-2 provides a widely studied approach to measuring positive body image across populations (Tylka and Wood-Barcalow, 2015).
Muscularity dissatisfaction and drive for muscularity
Muscularity dissatisfaction is an unfavorable evaluation of one's perceived muscular size, tone, or definition. Drive for muscularity describes the desire to become more muscular and associated efforts to achieve that physique. They are correlated constructs, but they are not interchangeable. The 15-item Drive for Muscularity Scale distinguishes attitudes toward muscularity from muscularity-related behaviors, although its factor structure and measurement invariance require attention across samples (McPherson et al., 2010; McCreary, 2025).
An important methodological finding is that desired muscularity may be weakly related to objective muscularity. In a study of 100 college men, anthropometric indicators generally failed to predict muscularity-oriented attitudes. This suggests that subjective standards and social interpretation can be more influential than measured body dimensions, while the study's small and selective sample limits generalization (McCreary, Karvinen, and Davis, 2006). A high drive-for-muscularity score alone does not identify muscle dysmorphia.
Body fat, height, and other appearance concerns
Many male body-image measures distinguish concerns about muscularity, low body fat, and height. The Male Body Attitudes Scale was developed using three samples of college men and identified these domains as distinguishable factors (Tylka, Bergeron, and Schwartz, 2005). Other men are concerned about hair loss, acne, scars, body proportions, aging, disability-related visibility, or how their appearance is interpreted socially. A scientifically complete assessment follows the specific person's concerns rather than imposing a culturally popular ideal on everyone.
Why Appearance Pressure Develops
Cultural norms and the lean-muscular ideal
Sociocultural theories describe appearance ideals as learned standards transmitted through peers, families, advertising, sport, entertainment, and digital media. Internalization occurs when a socially promoted ideal becomes a personal benchmark for the body. A man who continually interprets muscularity as evidence of success, social status, attractiveness, discipline, or masculinity may attach unusually high value to appearance. Social comparison then supplies immediate judgments about how far he believes he is from that benchmark.
These explanations operate at different levels. Exposure to an ideal provides a possible source of standards; internalization makes the standard personally salient; comparison creates an ongoing evaluation process; and mood, self-worth, and habits influence how the experience develops. Research findings depend on the timing and measurement of those processes. Associations between internalization and dissatisfaction support their relevance, but cross-sectional survey patterns cannot establish that exposure necessarily caused an individual's distress.
Masculinity and the problem of visibility
Conventional masculine expectations can make appearance concerns difficult to discuss. Pressure to appear strong, capable, self-reliant, sexually desirable, and in control can coexist with rules discouraging admissions of vulnerability. Consequently, distress may present as an intense training regimen, nutritional rigidity, excessive supplement use, or frustration with progress rather than explicit language about body shame. Clinical inquiries that focus only on wanting to lose weight or fear of fatness can overlook these presentations.
The meaning of muscularity also changes by social setting. A recreational lifter, competitive athlete, performing artist, adolescent, and older adult may attach different practical or symbolic meanings to physical development. Sport and strength training can support pleasure, competence, health, and connection, while aesthetic pressure can become entangled with performance goals. Separating intrinsic participation from appearance-contingent self-worth is clinically and scientifically useful.
Childhood, puberty, and peer experiences
Boys can encounter changing physical expectations during puberty, when bodies mature at different rates and peer comparisons become salient. Teasing about small size, weight, perceived weakness, height, or delayed development may contribute to insecurity. The effects of teasing depend on frequency, relational context, previous experiences, social support, and personal interpretation. Adolescent boys also navigate contrasting messages about being muscular, lean, tall, athletic, and effortlessly confident.
Developmental research should avoid treating all boys as the same group. Chronological age, pubertal timing, cultural setting, bullying exposure, and family attitudes may matter differently. In adolescents, concerns about body image should be assessed alongside growth, mood, relationships, nutrition, physical activity, school participation, and exposure to appearance-related ridicule. Rigid dieting or compulsive training during ongoing development warrants particular care.
Social Comparison, Body Surveillance, and Digital Life
Comparison as a psychological mechanism
Appearance comparison is the evaluation of one's looks against someone else's. Upward comparisons involve people perceived as closer to an ideal; downward comparisons involve people perceived as less aligned with an ideal. Their emotional consequences vary with personal meaning, context, and perceived attainability. A muscular physique may motivate one man to enjoy training and prompt another to scrutinize perceived deficiencies. Comparison frequency, emotional reaction, and resulting behavior all require measurement.
Self-objectification and body surveillance describe a persistent attention to how the body appears from an observer's perspective. In some men, this means frequently monitoring reflections, body measurements, photographs, and others' reactions. Repeated checking may briefly reduce uncertainty while perpetuating self-evaluation. These mechanisms are plausible targets for psychological work, although measures developed largely in female samples require validation for diverse groups of men.
Social media, fitness content, and algorithmic environments
Digital appearance pressure involves more than time spent online. Content type, frequency, identification with the depicted body, comments, commercial incentives, personal comparison habits, and recommendation systems shape individual experiences. Fitness posts may communicate training knowledge and social belonging while also normalizing unusually muscular physiques, restrictive dieting, performance-enhancing substances, retouched imagery, and lifestyle claims. Images do not disclose the full circumstances under which a physique was produced.
A 2025 study of 1,553 boys and men in Canada and the United States found that more frequent viewing of muscular bodies, muscle-building supplements, and muscle-building drugs on social media was associated with probable muscle dysmorphia independently of total social media time. Its observational design cannot establish a causal pathway from viewing to disorder (Ganson et al., 2025). A 2025 systematic review connected idealized fitness content with symptoms of muscle dysmorphia and orthorexia, while the underlying studies varied in methods and causal strength (Vintró-Alcaraz et al., 2025).
Evidence from broader adolescent social media research illustrates why within-person longitudinal findings matter. A three-wave study of 2,500 Czech adolescents identified persistent between-person associations but did not find that increased appearance activity reliably preceded increased dissatisfaction within the same individuals across later waves (Kvardova et al., 2025). This result should not be generalized mechanically to all platforms or adult men. It demonstrates that who tends to use appearance-focused media and what happens after a change in an individual's use are separate questions.
Edited bodies, filters, and emerging AI imagery
Lighting, posing, camera perspective, digital retouching, and generative image tools may complicate judgments about typical male appearance. A computer-generated muscular ideal can make an unrealistic physique look physically ordinary. Research specifically isolating algorithmically generated male appearance standards from other fitness imagery remains preliminary. Analysts must distinguish general appearance exposure, observed social comparison, algorithmic recommendation, and verified causal effects of AI-generated visuals.
Body Image, Mental Health, and Daily Functioning
Self-esteem, anxiety, and depressive symptoms
Male body dissatisfaction can correlate with lower self-esteem, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and reduced well-being. The associations are heterogeneous: distress may increase scrutiny of appearance, dissatisfaction may contribute to distress, and contextual factors such as bullying or social exclusion may influence both. The incremental association between men's body dissatisfaction and several measures of well-being has been documented, but the relevant study's cross-sectional approach limits causal interpretation (Bergeron and Tylka, 2007).
In clinical conversations, the important question is how body evaluations function in a person's life. Concern becomes more consequential when a man avoids dating, swimming, changing rooms, medical appointments, family activities, photographs, or social occasions; when repeated checking consumes substantial time; or when mood and identity become dominated by physical measurements. Neither modest grooming nor enthusiasm for exercise should automatically be interpreted as illness.
Eating behavior and compulsive exercise
Some men pursue a particular appearance through rigid meal schedules, strict food rules, escalating exercise, or alternating periods of restriction and overeating. Muscularity-oriented disordered eating can be missed by assessments focused predominantly on thinness or weight loss. It may involve distress over missed meals or workouts, inflexible macronutrient rules, and eating patterns driven by the perceived need to become simultaneously larger and leaner. Whether this constitutes an eating disorder depends on the full symptom pattern, medical consequences, impairment, and formal diagnostic assessment.
A 2025 study investigated muscularity concerns and behaviors among boys and men screening positive for probable eating disorders, emphasizing the need to ask about muscle-oriented goals rather than assume a single symptom presentation (Ganson et al., 2025). A comprehensive clinical review similarly describes how traditional assessments can overlook muscularity-oriented eating pathology (Lavender, Brown, and Murray, 2017). Exercise volume by itself cannot establish pathology: motive, flexibility, recovery, physiological risk, and interference with daily life matter.
Appearance-related substance risk
The wish to accelerate visible muscle development can become associated with the use of anabolic-androgenic steroids or other appearance- and performance-enhancing substances. A 2024 systematic review of 22 studies identified body-image factors as important correlates of anabolic-androgenic steroid use and reported related eating-disorder concerns, while acknowledging substantial heterogeneity (Zaiser et al., 2024). These associations require careful interpretation: a person who enjoys weight training or wants muscularity cannot be assumed to use such substances.
When these substances are involved, care should assess cardiovascular, endocrine, reproductive, mood, and other possible health consequences alongside appearance distress. Medical evaluation is appropriate for suspected use, adverse effects, or dependence-related concerns. Social stigma can reduce disclosure, making respectful and confidential assessment essential.
Relationships, intimacy, and quality of life
Appearance concerns may influence confidence in intimate settings, feelings about being photographed, physical affection, and perceived social desirability. The relevant pathways can include embarrassment, social comparison, perceived sexual expectations, and avoidance. A person's own priorities and social context determine how these feelings affect relationships. Psychological care can address emotional safety and meaningful participation rather than treat conventional attractiveness as a therapeutic endpoint.
The Diversity of Men's Body Image
Sexual orientation and minority stress
Men who identify as gay, bisexual, or another sexual minority may encounter additional appearance norms in dating, social, or subcultural spaces, alongside stigma and minority stress. A systematic review of 136 articles identified substantial concerns about body image among sexual minority men and emphasized the need for models incorporating group-specific risks and protective factors (Nowicki et al., 2022). The findings describe average patterns in studied samples, not an inherent characteristic of an orientation. Community belonging, supportive relationships, and identity affirmation can also have protective significance.
Gender identity and individual context
Men's body-image research must include transgender men and recognize differences between appearance dissatisfaction, social gender expectations, gender-related distress, and other psychological experiences. A transgender man's desire for gender-congruent embodiment does not by itself indicate a body-image disorder. Appropriate care considers gender affirmation, safety, personal goals, social discrimination, and co-occurring concerns without imposing an appearance norm. Older studies sometimes grouped participants exclusively by sex assigned at birth; results from those samples should not be generalized to all men.
Race, culture, class, and structural conditions
Idealized male appearances differ across cultural and historical environments. Ethnic and racial representation, racism, access to recreation, occupational demands, socioeconomic circumstances, and the availability of respectful health care can influence opportunities and social evaluation. A cross-cultural natural experiment investigated media exposure and muscularity goals in men, illustrating that appearance ideals have social and cultural dimensions (Thornborrow et al., 2020). Measurement translation alone is insufficient: researchers must also test whether questions carry comparable meanings across populations.
Disability, illness, and aging
Visible disability, chronic illness, changes in strength, scars, hair loss, body shape, and aging can influence embodiment and perceived social acceptance. Their psychological meaning varies across people and contexts. A person can value bodily functionality while grieving a physical change; positive body image need not require constant satisfaction. Structural barriers, discrimination, and insensitive comments may be more important sources of distress than the bodily characteristic itself. Clinical support should follow the person's own goals and functioning.
Assessment and Measurement
What validated questionnaires measure
The Drive for Muscularity Scale measures attitudes and behaviors concerning increased muscularity; it is not a diagnostic test. The Male Body Attitudes Scale assesses concern in domains such as muscularity, body fat, and height. Positive body image can be assessed with the Body Appreciation Scale-2. Research on eating symptoms may use the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, although its historical development and item coverage create potential blind spots for muscularity-oriented concerns (McCreary, 2025; Tylka, Bergeron, and Schwartz, 2005; Tylka and Wood-Barcalow, 2015).
In an analysis combining 245 male eating-disorder patients and 205 male undergraduates, the EDE-Q showed moderate-to-high discrimination but retained limitations for muscularity-oriented pathology. The authors recommended attention to measurement bias and further validation rather than a universal stand-alone diagnostic threshold (Identifying a Male Clinical Cutoff on the EDE-Q, 2018). Scores should be interpreted in relation to the instrument's purpose, validated population, cultural context, and appropriate clinical interview.
What clinical assessment must establish
A thorough assessment asks what appearance feature is troubling, how much time concern occupies, whether beliefs are experienced as certain, what behaviors follow, how much distress or impairment occurs, and whether eating, exercise, or substance practices pose medical risks. Clinicians also consider depression, anxiety, compulsive behavior, trauma, bullying, body-image history, and relevant medical or developmental factors. Diagnostic decisions require qualified assessment using current diagnostic criteria. A high questionnaire score, a fitness habit, or dissatisfaction with photographs is a signal to understand context, not a diagnosis.
Clinical Boundaries: Dissatisfaction, Muscle Dysmorphia, and Eating Disorders
Ordinary concern and body dissatisfaction
Body dissatisfaction is a psychological evaluation that some aspect of the body falls short of one's preferred or socially valued appearance. It ranges from transient feelings to persistent distress. It is common in nonclinical populations and may fluctuate with relationships, mood, changing life circumstances, and exposure to images. A person can report dissatisfaction without compulsive rituals, impairment, or a psychiatric disorder. Population research should avoid turning every unfavorable body judgment into psychopathology.
Muscle dysmorphia and body dysmorphic disorder
Muscle dysmorphia is a recognized specifier of body dysmorphic disorder in DSM-5-TR: the central preoccupation involves the belief that one's body is too small or insufficiently muscular, even when others see substantial muscularity. Evaluation for BDD requires clinically meaningful appearance preoccupation, repetitive behaviors or mental acts in response to concern, and distress or impairment, together with appropriate diagnostic exclusions. The distinction rests on the entire clinical presentation rather than objective strength, size, gym attendance, or an online label. Body checking, compulsive exercise, concealment, reassurance seeking, and avoidance may be involved, but none is independently diagnostic.
A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis examined links between muscle dysmorphia, obsessive-compulsive traits, and performance-enhancing substance use; the observed relationships cannot collapse these constructs into one disease or settle causal order (Çınaroğlu and Yılmazer, 2025). Severe dysmorphic distress may coexist with depression and suicidal thinking. Clinicians should directly assess safety and functioning when concern becomes intense and disabling. NICE recommends BDD-specific cognitive behavioral therapy incorporating exposure and response prevention, with medication options and specialist involvement according to severity (NICE CG31).
Eating disorders, social anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms
A feeding or eating disorder is defined by its specific eating-related syndrome, associated psychopathology, and clinical consequences, not simply by wishing to be muscular. Body dysmorphic disorder emphasizes preoccupation with perceived physical defects and associated repetitive responses. Social anxiety disorder centers on fear of negative social evaluation across relevant situations; appearance may be one concern within that fear. Obsessive-compulsive disorder has its own obsession-compulsion patterns and diagnostic requirements. Conditions can overlap, and a clinician should evaluate each relevant symptom domain rather than select a diagnosis based on a single exercise or checking behavior.
A man who avoids a beach because of feared appearance judgment may experience body dissatisfaction, social anxiety, BDD, or a combination, depending on the pattern and severity of the fear. A man following rigid nutritional rules might be pursuing sport performance, following a culturally prescribed ideal, or experiencing clinically significant disordered eating. A differential assessment investigates function and consequences before assigning clinical meaning.
Prevention and Psychological Interventions
The evidence for programs designed for men
Intervention research has historically included fewer men than women. A 2023 systematic review examined eight studies, six of them randomized controlled trials, of psychosocial body-image and disordered-eating interventions in adult men. Dissonance-based interventions showed promising benefits, while evidence for media-literacy and psychoeducational programs remained limited. The authors highlighted variation in measures, weak or moderate study quality, and restricted population diversity (Hendricks et al., 2023). This is a promising evidence base with clear limitations rather than proof of a universally effective approach.
The Body Project: More Than Muscles was tested in a randomized study of 112 men experiencing body dissatisfaction. Two dissonance-based sessions reduced several measured risk factors relative to a waitlist at postintervention and one-month follow-up. The short follow-up, waitlist comparator, and study population limit conclusions about long-term clinical outcomes (Brown et al., 2017). A separate randomized study of 79 male collegiate athletes found improvements in selected appearance-related outcomes following a tailored athlete program, while its size and follow-up constrain inference (Perelman et al., 2022).
Cognitive behavioral approaches and flexibility
Cognitive behavioral approaches examine how body-related interpretations, comparison rituals, checking, avoidance, and rigid rules maintain distress. Depending on a person's needs, therapy may develop more flexible interpretations, reduce compulsive monitoring, support participation in avoided activities, and address self-worth organized around one physical ideal. When diagnostic BDD is present, evidence-based BDD treatment should be selected rather than relying solely on generic self-esteem advice. NICE differentiates options by impairment and recommends specialist evaluation when initial treatment is insufficient (NICE CG31).
Building body appreciation and a broader identity
Body appreciation and functionality-focused work may shift attention toward what the body enables: mobility, creativity, recovery, communication, strength, rest, and connection. Such approaches can help a person notice bodily needs and reduce exclusive investment in external judgment. Their usefulness depends on context, and functionality should never become another standard by which disabled or chronically ill people are judged. Self-compassion, supportive relationships, flexible activity, and values beyond appearance provide plausible avenues for improved well-being. Evidence for specific strategies varies across intervention type, population, and outcome.
Digital literacy and everyday protective practices
A practical approach to digital appearance pressure includes noticing which content reliably initiates unhelpful comparison, understanding that images may be curated or edited, diversifying followed accounts, and recovering agency over attention. These steps are behavioral options rather than universally validated clinical treatments. In the gym, a similar distinction is useful: progressive training and adequate recovery can reflect self-directed activity, while persistent punishment, social withdrawal, or panic over missed sessions should prompt reflection and possibly consultation. Conversations with parents, educators, coaches, and health professionals can normalize discussion of body-related distress among boys and men.
Research Quality, Uncertainty, and Future Directions
The strongest established conclusions are that male body image has multiple domains, muscularity-oriented ideals are salient in many studied groups, validated measures distinguish several constructs, and appearance concerns can be associated with distress and impairment. The link between specific exposure patterns and later body-image change is more difficult to establish. Much evidence relies on self-report, convenience samples, Western university populations, and single-time assessments. Repeated observations can improve temporal inference, but even longitudinal association is not automatically causal. Controlled trials better assess interventions under specified conditions, yet some male-focused trials remain small and short.
Research priorities include culturally validated measures, larger studies of older and transgender men, greater representation across disability and racial groups, mechanistic trials on appearance comparison, careful separation of healthy training from compulsion, longer-term intervention follow-up, and experimental investigation of AI-generated male appearance ideals. More precise measurement should help clinical services identify needs while avoiding the medicalization of normal appearance variation and meaningful sport participation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can men experience serious body-image problems without wanting to lose weight?
Yes. A man may be distressed about insufficient muscle size, definition, height, facial features, hair, or another appearance concern. Muscularity-oriented concerns are particularly important because weight-focused screening may miss them. Distress, rigidity, medical risks, and functional impairment determine whether specialist assessment is appropriate.
Is wanting to be muscular a sign of muscle dysmorphia?
No. Drive for muscularity is a measurable attitude and behavior pattern. Muscle dysmorphia requires clinical assessment of dysmorphic preoccupation and its consequences. Strength training or having an athletic goal does not establish BDD.
Do social media platforms cause muscle dysmorphia?
Research documents associations between exposure to muscularity-focused content and probable dysmorphia symptoms, including in 2025 studies. Observational findings cannot establish that exposure caused a disorder. Individual vulnerability, comparison processes, selection of content, and prior concerns may all contribute.
Can body image improve without changing the body?
Yes. Psychological interventions aim to change interpretation, comparison, avoidance, self-worth, and participation. Studies of dissonance-based interventions for men show promising improvements in measured outcomes, although long-term generalizability remains to be determined.
When should a man seek professional assessment?
Assessment is appropriate when appearance worries occupy substantial time, cause marked distress, disrupt relationships or work, lead to dangerous exercise or substance practices, or coexist with restrictive eating, depression, or other symptoms. Urgent help is appropriate for immediate danger or suicidal intent. A qualified clinician can evaluate body image, eating symptoms, substance exposure, and possible clinical disorders together.
Related Articles
Cluster Body Image and Appearance Psychology — the scientific chapter situating male appearance experiences within multidimensional body image, stigma, clinical distinctions, and intervention research.
Body Image in Teenagers: Puberty, Peers, and Mental Health — development, puberty, peer influence, and adolescent vulnerability.
Body Image Psychology: Definition, Components, and Development — foundations of the construct and its developmental dimensions.
Body Dissatisfaction: Causes, Signs, and Psychological Effects — evaluative dissatisfaction across appearance domains.
Appearance Comparison: Why We Compare Looks and What Research Shows — social comparison processes and their evidence.
Internalizing Beauty Ideals: Thinness, Muscularity, and Appearance Pressure — mechanisms linking appearance norms to personal standards.
How to Improve Body Image: Evidence-Based Psychological Strategies — psychological intervention approaches and research limitations.
References
Bergeron, D., and Tylka, T. L. (2007). Support for the uniqueness of body dissatisfaction from drive for muscularity among men. Body Image, 4, 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.05.002.
Brown, T. A., Forney, K. J., Pinner, D., and Keel, P. K. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of The Body Project: More Than Muscles for men with body dissatisfaction. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50, 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22724.
Çınaroğlu, M., and Yılmazer, E. (2025). Muscle Dysmorphia, Obsessive–Compulsive Traits, and Anabolic Steroid Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091206.
Ganson, K. T., Rodgers, R. F., Testa, A., Murray, S. B., and Nagata, J. M. (2025). Exploring muscularity concerns and behaviours among boys and men with probable eating disorders. Body Image, 54, 101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101953.
Ganson, K. T., Testa, A., Rodgers, R. F., and Nagata, J. M. (2025). Associations between muscularity-oriented social media content and muscle dysmorphia among boys and men. Body Image, 53, 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101903.
Hendricks, E., Jenkinson, E., Falconer, L., and Griffiths, C. (2023). How effective are psychosocial interventions at improving body image and reducing disordered eating in adult men? A systematic review. Body Image, 47, 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.08.004.
Kvardova, N., Machackova, H., Maes, C., and Vandenbosch, L. (2025). Navigating Beauty Standards on Social Media: Impact of Appearance Activity on Adolescents' Body Dissatisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 54, 1999–2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02159-y.
Lavender, J. M., Brown, T. A., and Murray, S. B. (2017). Men, muscles, and eating disorders: An overview of traditional and muscularity-oriented disordered eating. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19, 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0787-5.
McCreary, D. R. (2025). Drive for Muscularity Scale (DMS). In Handbook of Body Image-Related Measures. Cambridge University Press. Publisher link.
McCreary, D. R., Karvinen, K., and Davis, C. (2006). The relationship between the drive for muscularity and anthropometric measures of muscularity and adiposity. Body Image, 3, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.01.006.
McPherson, K. E., McCarthy, P., McCreary, D. R., and McMillan, S. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Drive for Muscularity Scale in a community-based sample of Scottish men participating in an organized sporting event. Body Image, 7, 368–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.06.001.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2005; current online guidance). Obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder: treatment (CG31). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg31/chapter/Recommendations.
Nowicki, G. P., Marchwinski, B. R., O'Flynn, J. L., Griffiths, S., and Rodgers, R. F. (2022). Body image and associated factors among sexual minority men: A systematic review. Body Image. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.08.006.
Perelman, H., et al. (2022). Reducing eating disorder risk among male athletes: A randomized controlled trial investigating the male athlete body project. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 55, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23665.
Schaefer, L. M., et al. (2018). Identifying a male clinical cutoff on the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22972.
Thornborrow, T., Onwuegbusi, T., Mohamed, S., Boothroyd, L. G., and Tovée, M. J. (2020). Muscles and the media: A natural experiment across cultures in men's body image. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00495.
Tylka, T. L., and Wood-Barcalow, N. L. (2015). The Body Appreciation Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25462882/.
Tylka, T. L., Bergeron, D., and Schwartz, J. P. (2005). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Male Body Attitudes Scale (MBAS). Body Image, 2, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.001.
Vintró-Alcaraz, C., Ballero Reque, C., Paslakis, G., and Testa, G. (2025). Idealized Body Images and Fitness Lifestyles on Social Media: A Systematic Review Exploring the Link Between Social Media Use and Symptoms of Orthorexia Nervosa and Muscle Dysmorphia. European Eating Disorders Review, 34, 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.70027.
Zaiser, C., Laskowski, N. M., Müller, R., Abdulla, K., Sabel, L., Ballero Reque, C., Brandt, G., and Paslakis, G. (2024). The relationship between anabolic androgenic steroid use and body image, eating behavior, and physical activity by gender: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 163, 105772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105772.