Psychology by BogdanovaThe Encyclopedia of Psychology for the Artificial Era
Psychological Research

How to Stop Gambling: Evidence-Based First Steps and Ongoing Support

Stopping gambling begins with reducing immediate access to bets, protecting money needed for daily life, and involving another person or professional who can help maintain the plan. A practical first day includes leaving gambling websites or venues, enrolling in available self-exclusion programs, using bank or device gambling blocks, avoiding access to spare gambling funds, and contacting a qualified gambling-support service. For people whose gambling has caused repeated losses or major distress, specialist assessment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) provide structured routes into recovery. Recovery also involves addressing debts, relationships, mental health, and the conditions that trigger a return to gambling. NICE gambling-related harms guideline.

People seek this information for different reasons. Some have just experienced a frightening loss; others have spent years repeatedly promising to stop, hiding bets, borrowing money, or feeling unable to leave an app unused. Help is appropriate at any level of gambling-related harm. A person can need urgent financial and emotional support without meeting the criteria for gambling disorder. The aim of this guide is to make the first steps concrete and explain how ongoing, evidence-based care fits together with everyday changes.

What to do in the next 24 hours

Stop the next bet and create distance from gambling

Begin with an immediate commitment that can be acted on today: do not place another bet to recover money already lost. Close open gambling sessions, remove saved betting shortcuts, log out of accounts, and put physical distance between yourself and gambling venues. If you are in the middle of a gambling episode, leave the environment, contact someone you trust, and move to a place where money cannot be wagered readily. For online betting, a second person can sit with you while you set up restrictions and contact support.

The critical decision is to stop pursuing losses. A lost stake is a completed financial event. Further betting exposes additional money to uncertain outcomes; it does not convert earlier losses into a recoverable debt owed by the gambling operator. The urge to chase can be especially intense immediately after a loss, when distress and a desire for relief converge. Treat that urge as a reason to interrupt access rather than as evidence that one more attempt will succeed. Gambling-specific cognitive distortions and loss-chasing behavior are well-established therapeutic targets. NICE recommendations.

Use several barriers rather than relying on one

Sign up for self-exclusion offered by relevant gambling operators or your jurisdiction's centralized exclusion program. Self-exclusion generally restricts access to particular licensed operators or venues for a defined period, although eligibility, coverage, duration, and enforcement vary by location. Add site and app blocking software, unsubscribe from promotional messages, turn off gambling-related notifications, and ask your bank whether it supports blocking gambling merchant transactions. Remove saved payment methods from gambling accounts and devices. A barrier is most useful when it covers the ways a person actually gambles, including casino websites, sports betting, retail venues, or unlicensed products.

Do not assume that a single account closure blocks all other providers, payment channels, devices, or jurisdictions. Some blocks can be bypassed, and some transactions can be miscategorized. Combine independent restrictions, check how long they remain active, and review them with a support person. NICE specifically recommends discussing self-exclusion, blocking software, marketing restrictions, bank payment blocks, and agreed limits on access to money as initial support measures. Research on self-exclusion supports its potential value but also documents uneven awareness, incomplete coverage, and challenges in estimating sustained effects. NICE recommendations; Bijker and colleagues, systematic review.

Protect essential money without surrendering your safety

Separate immediate living expenses from money that has previously been used for betting. Identify rent or mortgage payments, utilities, groceries, transportation, medication, and dependent-care costs that must be protected. If it is safe and mutually agreed, arrange temporary financial safeguards with a trusted person: for example, limited discretionary spending access, a separate account for essential bills, or a plan for reviewing transactions together. Any arrangement should preserve informed consent, access to necessities, and protection from economic abuse. A financially controlling or abusive partner is not an appropriate custodian of access to money.

Avoid borrowing to chase losses, taking expensive short-term loans to resume gambling, and making unreviewed promises to repay every debt immediately. Collect bank statements and creditors' notices, prioritize essential needs, and seek independent debt counseling or regulated financial advice when necessary. Gambling-related financial damage can coexist with housing risk, legal difficulties, and relationship conflict, so it often requires help beyond the therapy room. NICE recommendations; World Health Organization, Gambling.

Tell one safe person and make one professional contact

Choose a person who can respond without humiliation or threats. A useful disclosure is specific: explain that gambling has become harmful, say what immediate protective steps you have taken, and ask for one concrete form of help, such as accompanying you to an appointment or checking that you have enrolled in self-exclusion. If disclosure could expose you to violence or coercive control, speak first with a clinician, confidential helpline, or specialist support organization.

Contact a healthcare professional, a gambling treatment service, a recognized peer-support program, or a national help service. In the United States, the National Council on Problem Gambling lists its National Problem Gambling Helpline as 1-800-MY-RESET, with call, text, and chat access to referral support; it explicitly states that the service is not an emergency crisis line. Availability and treatment options depend on location. An international online starting point is Gambling Therapy, operated by Gordon Moody. National Council on Problem Gambling; Gambling Therapy.

When gambling becomes a clinical and safety concern

Gambling disorder is a recognized mental disorder in the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-5-TR and the World Health Organization's ICD-11. Its defining features concern persistent or recurrent gambling with impaired control, increasing priority given to gambling, and continuation despite adverse consequences, considered within each classification's diagnostic rules. DSM-5-TR uses a specified set of criteria across a typical 12-month period. A diagnosis requires clinical evaluation rather than a self-test alone. The practical need to stop gambling can arise much earlier than a diagnostic threshold, including after serious financial losses or family harm. World Health Organization, Gambling; NICE recommendations.

Signs that justify a prompt assessment include repeated failed attempts to cut back, gambling with essential money, hiding financial activity, chasing losses, borrowing or stealing to continue, losing sleep to gamble, substantial distress, or the threat of losing housing or relationships. A screening questionnaire such as the Problem Gambling Severity Index can help identify risk and prompt discussion. A positive score is not a diagnosis, and a low score does not erase a dangerous debt, crisis, or other harm. An assessment can cover gambling patterns, finances, mental health, substance use, physical health, suicidality, and social circumstances. NICE recommendations.

What to do if gambling has led to suicidal thoughts

Gambling-related harms are associated with suicidal thoughts, attempts, and deaths, particularly where acute loss, debt, shame, isolation, or co-occurring mental disorders are present. Observational associations should not be interpreted as proof that one factor caused a particular death. Clinical guidance nevertheless treats gambling-related crises as serious, and NICE recommends asking directly about suicidal intent and arranging urgent specialist assessment when risk is immediate. NICE recommendations; World Health Organization, Gambling.

If you might act on suicidal thoughts, have made a plan, or cannot stay safe, contact emergency services now or go to the nearest emergency department. Do not remain alone while waiting for help; ask someone safe to stay with you and to help reduce access to means of self-harm. In the United States, call or text 988 for immediate crisis support. The gambling helpline provides referral and gambling-related assistance, while 988 and emergency services are appropriate for immediate suicidal crises. Elsewhere, use the local emergency number or an established crisis service. CDC, Mental Health Resources.

Why stopping can feel difficult even after a firm decision

Gambling products deliver uncertain rewards on intermittent schedules. Wins, near misses, losses, and promotional cues can become associated with anticipation and rapid re-engagement. Learning processes can sustain betting even when cumulative outcomes are negative, while gambling advertisements, mobile notifications, and easy deposits repeatedly renew exposure. These mechanisms help explain why motivation may fluctuate sharply across a day and why reducing access is a sensible first step. They describe interacting patterns rather than a single universal pathway for every individual. NICE guideline; World Health Organization, Gambling.

Cognitive distortions also matter. A person may believe that a sequence of losses makes a win due, that an almost-winning result forecasts future success, or that personal skill controls a chance-determined outcome. These judgments are especially persuasive when someone is anxious about money. CBT often works with such appraisals, alongside behavioral routines and coping skills. Gambling may also temporarily distract from low mood, loneliness, anxiety, boredom, or conflict; when distress returns, a person can be drawn back to the same short-lived escape. Effective recovery asks what gambling was doing in the person's life and builds other ways of meeting those needs. NICE recommendations; Free and colleagues, 2024 systematic review.

Gambling problems are shaped by context. High-speed products, betting availability, advertising, delayed financial feedback, and social expectations can increase exposure, while mental health conditions, substance use, neurodevelopmental differences, and unstable finances can influence the capacity to change. These factors are clinically relevant without creating a simple deterministic explanation. Recognizing product and environmental influences helps avoid treating the whole problem as a personal test of willpower. World Health Organization, Gambling; NICE recommendations.

A practical plan for the first week

Days one and two: stabilize access, money, and communication

Use the first day to complete immediate blocks and obtain contact details for support. On the second day, check whether each restriction actually works across every relevant account, platform, and venue. If any gap remains, add another layer of protection. Make a simple list of financial obligations and any immediate deadlines, without trying to solve every debt at once. Set aside time for eating, sleep, medication, school or work, and basic movement. Acute exhaustion and intoxication can make it harder to use a coping plan.

Write down the names of one person who knows what is happening and one service you will contact. If financial pressures include housing, threats, or inability to buy food, tell a support service about those needs explicitly. Seeking gambling treatment and addressing immediate social emergencies can proceed in parallel. NICE recommendations.

Days three and four: identify the gambling cycle

Record a few recent gambling episodes without reconstructing them as invitations to bet again. Identify the place, time, device, money source, social situation, feeling, expectation, and outcome. Look for high-risk windows: payday, late nights, sports events, alcohol use, commuting past venues, arguments, or periods alone. Then assign a specific alternative action to each major trigger. For example, change the route home, attend a scheduled meeting during a match, leave a phone with a trusted person during vulnerable hours, or call someone before access to a payment method returns.

This is a functional analysis rather than a moral inventory. It turns an abstract promise to stop into observable decisions and options that can be rehearsed. A therapist can refine the plan and distinguish situational triggers from broader difficulties such as depression or sleep disruption. NICE CBT and relapse prevention recommendations.

Days five through seven: begin structured care and review the plan

Arrange an appointment with a clinician experienced in gambling-related harms where possible. Ask whether they provide gambling-specific CBT, a brief motivational intervention, individual or group care, and follow-up. If professional treatment is unavailable immediately, attend a verified peer-support meeting or contact a helpline while keeping access barriers active. Review the week with someone safe: what prevented bets, what produced strong urges, what felt ineffective, and what needs changing. A person can decide to pursue abstinence while also setting measurable goals for financial stability, mental health, family safety, and work. NICE recommendations.

A seven-day plan is an organizing device, not a clinically validated universal treatment duration. People facing severe risk, psychosis, mania, major withdrawal from alcohol or drugs, or imminent loss of housing need a faster, individualized response. The sequence should be adapted to safety and access to care, not treated as a test that must be passed in order.

Evidence-based treatment and what research actually shows

Gambling-specific cognitive behavioral therapy

CBT is the most consistently supported psychological intervention for gambling disorder. It typically combines understanding gambling triggers, examining inaccurate beliefs about chance and control, reducing cue-driven behavior, strengthening coping responses, planning alternative activities, and preparing for relapse risks. NICE recommends group CBT, with individual CBT when groups are unsuitable or not preferred, provided by practitioners with gambling-specific competence. It also includes relapse prevention as part of treatment. NICE NG248.

A Cochrane review of psychological therapies found beneficial effects of CBT immediately after treatment, while noting limitations in trial quality and a shortage of durable longer-term outcome data. A later systematic review and meta-analysis including 29 randomized controlled trials and 3,083 analyzed participants reported benefits of psychological interventions and the strongest evidence for CBT, but also substantial risk of bias and limited long-term evidence. Clinical efficacy therefore supports offering CBT without promising an identical outcome or permanent remission for every patient. Cowlishaw and colleagues, Cochrane review; 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis.

Motivational interviewing and brief interventions

Motivational interviewing helps people explore ambivalence, clarify personal reasons to change, and strengthen commitment to practical steps. It can be useful when a person recognizes harm yet still experiences powerful reasons to gamble. NICE advises considering it to support engagement and confidence, including before or alongside more structured therapy. The evidence for motivational interviewing as a standalone method for reducing gambling severity remains less consistent than that for CBT. NICE recommendations; Cowlishaw and colleagues.

Brief intervention also has practical value as an entry point: a healthcare professional can identify harm, discuss risk, offer assistance, and arrange referral. Its role is to establish a path into care when the person may have only one opportunity to disclose gambling problems. The amount and type of support should match the severity and complexity of the situation.

Medication: a specialist decision, not a first-day self-treatment

There is no medication that reliably replaces behavioral and psychological care. Research on medications for gambling disorder is smaller and less certain than the psychotherapy evidence. A Cochrane review found preliminary low-certainty evidence that opioid antagonists, including naltrexone, may reduce gambling symptom severity in the short term; longer-term effects and broader functioning outcomes remain uncertain. NICE suggests that a qualified specialist may consider naltrexone after an appropriate course of psychological therapy has not achieved desired results or repeated relapses have occurred. It described this use as off-label in January 2025. Naltrexone requires medical screening and consideration of contraindications, including opioid use and liver-related risks. Do not start, stop, or borrow medication based on a gambling self-help article. Dowling and colleagues, Cochrane review; NICE recommendations.

Peer support, online support, and continuity of care

Peer groups may reduce isolation, offer accountability, and give access to people who have navigated similar situations. Gamblers Anonymous lists in-person, virtual, and telephone meetings, while Gambling Therapy offers online help internationally. NICE recommends offering peer support to people who wish to use it as part of wider treatment and support. Peer support does not have to substitute for a clinician, and people with acute mental health risk need the relevant professional response. NICE recommendations; Gamblers Anonymous meetings; Gambling Therapy.

Remote treatment and digital self-help can widen access, especially for people far from specialized clinics or concerned about stigma. Studies indicate promise, but intervention types, measures, guidance levels, participant characteristics, and follow-up intervals vary. A person using an app should determine whether it offers structured evidence-based therapy, referral, or simply motivational content, and should check privacy terms and emergency pathways. 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis; NICE recommendations.

Handling gambling urges without placing a bet

An urge is a time-varying experience, not an instruction. When it begins, interrupt the immediate opportunity to gamble. Put down the phone, leave the betting context, move to a different room, or call the person named in your plan. Note the trigger and set a short period in which no gambling decision will be made. During that time, use an activity that changes attention or arousal: walk, eat, exercise at an appropriate intensity, shower, complete a simple task, or speak with someone. Then review whether the urge has changed, and repeat the protective step if necessary.

For recurring urges, combine immediate coping with longer-term alterations to the environment. A person whose gambling is tied to sports viewing may need a different social routine, not merely a browser blocker. Someone who gambles during nighttime anxiety may benefit from sleep and mental health assessment. Someone who chases losses during payday may need agreed financial arrangements. These strategies are consistent with stimulus control, coping-skills training, and relapse prevention used in gambling-specific CBT, although any individual coping exercise should be understood as a practical component rather than a separately proven cure. NICE recommendations.

Avoid testing recovery by visiting a gambling site or making a small bet to see whether control has returned. If an urge becomes overwhelming, contact a support service and strengthen financial barriers. If it is accompanied by thoughts of self-harm, move immediately to crisis assistance.

Debt, disclosure, and rebuilding financial stability

Stopping wagers protects future funds, while recovery from existing losses follows its own timeline. Begin with a complete, private inventory of bank balances, credit accounts, essential expenses, arrears, gambling-related borrowing, and any payments that are due soon. Where appropriate, seek reputable debt counseling and discuss hardship arrangements with creditors. Verify any commercial debt service's fees and regulatory standing before sharing sensitive financial information. Prioritize food, housing, essential utilities, medication, and the safety of dependents. NICE recommendations.

Financial shame can encourage secrecy, and secrecy can increase the opportunity for further gambling. A disclosure plan may include acknowledging the problem, sharing a factual summary of risks, and outlining concrete safeguards. It should avoid asking family members to promise unlimited financial rescues. Partners and relatives may need their own support and boundaries. NICE recognizes gambling-related harm to affected others and advises offering support to families and close contacts, including help with distress and communication. NICE recommendations.

Recovery does not require solving every past financial consequence before making progress. Track indicators that can be improved now: days without betting, barriers maintained, bills protected, meetings attended, disclosure completed safely, and a credible debt-management plan initiated. These are practical process markers, not diagnostic tests or guarantees of long-term abstinence.

Recovery after a lapse or relapse

A lapse means a return to gambling after an effort to stop; its duration, intensity, and consequences vary. If gambling occurs again, stop the session as soon as possible, protect remaining funds, tell an appropriate support person, and seek prompt follow-up. Examine what made access possible and what preceded the episode, then alter the recovery plan. Do not escalate the episode into additional gambling in an effort to reverse losses. Additional support or renewed treatment may be needed.

NICE recommends discussing relapse without stigmatizing the person, preparing for high-risk situations, and providing rapid access back to care. It also warns that relapse may be accompanied by severe distress and risk of self-harm, which makes immediate safety assessment important when appropriate. Long-term recovery can involve repeated adjustment of supports as work, finances, living situations, and social networks change. NICE relapse recommendations.

Why self-exclusion remains useful and has limits

Self-exclusion can create a period with fewer opportunities to gamble, but evidence quality varies by program design and outcome measure. A 2023 systematic review estimated low general-population uptake and limited awareness, which restrict real-world reach. A randomized French study published in 2025 found that extending restrictions on direct commercial gambling messages after self-exclusion reduced deposits at several follow-ups, while the primary outcome of gambling losses did not differ significantly. This distinction matters: a positive secondary measure does not establish success on every clinically important outcome. Bijker and colleagues; von Hammerstein and colleagues, randomized trial.

Evidence on gambling consumer-protection tools also includes heterogeneous measures, design limitations, and differences across operators and jurisdictions. Blocking and self-exclusion are reasonable protective measures alongside care, with ongoing evaluation needed to understand durable effects and possible substitution to other products. Riley, Oakes, and Lawn, 2024 review of harm-minimization tools.

Supporting a partner, family member, or friend

A family member can express concern plainly, ask about immediate safety, and offer to help arrange treatment or practical restrictions. Useful support includes listening, declining to fund further betting, protecting shared essential expenses through fair agreed measures, and helping the person access professional or peer assistance. Avoid shaming, threats, surveillance that creates unsafe conflict, or unilateral financial control. When there is violence, intimidation, or economic abuse, prioritize personal safety and specialized support.

Family members can seek help even if the person gambling has not agreed to change. Gam-Anon provides peer meetings for people affected by another person's gambling, while clinical services may offer family consultations, safety planning, and support for financial and psychological consequences. Involving loved ones in treatment should be collaborative and safe, with individual support available when joint sessions are unsuitable. NICE guidance for affected others; Gam-Anon meeting directory.

Gambling, mental health, and special circumstances

Depression, anxiety, sleep problems, alcohol or other substance use, ADHD, bipolar disorder, trauma-related symptoms, and certain medication effects can coexist with gambling problems. Their relationships differ: a condition may precede gambling-related harm, intensify during financial crisis, or be maintained by a shared vulnerability. Assessment should examine chronology, clinical severity, medication history, and immediate safety rather than assuming one uniform causal direction. Treating a co-occurring condition may be essential to sustaining improvement in gambling behavior. NICE assessment and comorbidity recommendations.

People who gamble while experiencing episodes of mania or hypomania need evaluation for mood symptoms and altered judgment. Those taking medications that can affect impulse control, including certain dopamine agonists, should discuss new gambling behavior promptly with the prescribing clinician and should not abruptly change their regimen on their own. Alcohol or drug intoxication can also undermine plans to avoid gambling, and substance dependence may require coordinated specialist treatment. NICE recommendations.

Adolescents and young adults may encounter gambling-like products, sports betting promotions, loot boxes, or social pressure before they have stable financial autonomy. A caregiver should focus on safety, age-appropriate restrictions, payment protections, nonjudgmental communication, and professional evaluation when meaningful impairment or losses occur. Different jurisdictions regulate youth gambling and in-game purchases differently. Spending in a video game does not by itself establish either gambling disorder or gaming disorder; assessment must consider the activity and its actual harms. WHO gambling factsheet.

What progress can look like over months and years

The most immediate outcome is fewer or no bets and reduced exposure to gambling opportunities. Over time, assess whether essential expenses remain protected, borrowing is stabilizing, sleep and mental health are improving, relationships are becoming safer, and the person can recognize and respond to triggers. Follow-up should be individualized: some people need brief intervention and practical safeguards; others need ongoing specialist care and coordinated treatment of other health conditions.

Research commonly measures gambling frequency, expenditure, symptom severity, and treatment completion. These are useful but incomplete indicators. Lower gambling expenditure can reflect less disposable income rather than improved control, and short follow-up may miss later problems. Studies also use different scales, recruitment methods, and definitions of response. Personal recovery evaluation should combine behavior, harms, function, and safety rather than relying on one score. Cochrane psychological therapies review; 2023 psychological intervention meta-analysis.

Hope is most reliable when paired with a system: barriers that remain in place, an agreed financial plan, timely treatment, support from safe people, and accessible pathways back to help if circumstances change. The first step can be taken today, and later steps can be adjusted in proportion to actual needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can someone stop gambling without professional treatment?

Some people reduce or stop gambling through personal action, barriers, and social support. Severe or recurrent gambling harm, repeated failed attempts to quit, suicidality, major debt, or significant co-occurring mental health symptoms warrant clinical assessment. Professional support can also be useful before harms become severe. The fact that someone has chosen a self-directed approach should not prevent them from accessing therapy later. NICE recommendations.

Is it better to quit completely or try to control betting?

Treatment goals are discussed collaboratively, and NICE describes abstinence as a typical aim for people receiving care for gambling that harms. For someone who repeatedly loses control once a bet begins, complete abstinence and strong access restrictions may be a safer and clearer goal. A clinician can assess severity, previous attempts, harm, and readiness to change. A plan that protects immediate safety and essential finances takes priority over abstract debates about controlled gambling. NICE recommendations.

How long do urges to gamble last?

There is no single duration that applies to everyone. Urges vary with situations, reminders, mood, opportunity, and patterns of gambling. It is more useful to create a repeatable response than to expect that every urge will disappear after a fixed number of minutes. Gambling-specific CBT and relapse prevention can help identify triggers and strengthen coping responses. NICE recommendations.

Should I repay gambling debts before starting treatment?

Begin protecting essential expenses and arranging help with urgent debt issues immediately, alongside gambling support. Financial treatment and psychological treatment address related but distinct parts of harm. Waiting for all debts to be repaid can delay care, while untreated gambling may generate additional losses. Ask a qualified debt adviser and gambling support professional to help coordinate realistic priorities. NICE recommendations.

Does relapse mean that recovery has failed?

A return to gambling calls for rapid reassessment of access barriers, triggers, safety, and the intensity of care. It does not erase work already done. The important response is to limit immediate consequences, obtain support, and strengthen the plan. A lapse accompanied by suicidal thoughts or an acute crisis requires urgent intervention. NICE relapse recommendations.

Where can I find help right now?

In the United States, contact the National Problem Gambling Helpline at 1-800-MY-RESET for gambling-related assistance and referrals; find peer meetings through Gamblers Anonymous. Gambling Therapy offers international online support. For immediate danger or suicidal crisis, use emergency services; in the United States, call or text 988. Gambling helplines and emergency crisis lines serve different purposes. National Council on Problem Gambling; Gamblers Anonymous; Gambling Therapy; CDC.

Related Articles

Cluster Gambling, Gaming and Behavioral Addictions — the published scientific overview of gambling and gaming disorders, behavioral mechanisms, risk environments, assessment, treatment research, and public-health implications.

Self-Exclusion for Gambling: How It Works and What Research Shows — an examination of self-exclusion programs, their practical use, outcome evidence, and limitations.

Gambling Disorder and Suicide Risk: Evidence and Safety Planning — a specialist examination of gambling-related suicidal risk and safety-oriented care.

Gambling Disorder Treatment: Psychological Care and Recovery — Review treatment pathways for gambling disorder, especially cognitive behavioral therapy, motivational approaches, and coordinated care.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Gambling Disorder — Learn how gambling-specific cognitive behavioral therapy addresses triggers, distorted beliefs, behavior change, and relapse prevention.

References

Bijker, R., Booth, N., Merkouris, S. S., Dowling, N. A., and Rodda, S. N. (2023). International prevalence of self-exclusion from gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Addiction Reports, 10, 844–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-023-00510-6

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Mental health resources. https://www.cdc.gov/mental-health/caring/

Cowlishaw, S., Merkouris, S., Dowling, N., Anderson, C., Jackson, A., and Thomas, S. (2022). Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD008937. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008937.pub2

Dowling, N., Merkouris, S., Lubman, D., Thomas, S., Bowden-Jones, H., and Cowlishaw, S. (2022). Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of disordered and problem gambling. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD008936. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008936.pub2

Eriksen, J. W., et al. (2023). Psychological intervention for gambling disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 12(3), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2023.00034

Fisher, M. L., et al. (2025). Legal and regulatory responses to online gambling harms: A scoping review of evidence. Harm Reduction Journal. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01292-y

Free, B. L., Smith, E. H., Ginley, M. K., Whelan, J. P., and Pfund, R. A. (2024). Does cognitive-behavioral treatment affect putative mechanisms of change among individuals with problem gambling? A systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 158, 108110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108110

Gam-Anon International Service Office. (n.d.). Meeting directory. https://signin.gam-anon.org/meeting-directory

Gamblers Anonymous. (n.d.). Find a meeting. https://gamblersanonymous.org/find-a-meeting/

Gambling Therapy. (n.d.). Support for gambling harm. https://gamblingtherapy.org/

National Council on Problem Gambling. (n.d.). About the National Problem Gambling Helpline. https://www.ncpgambling.org/help-treatment/about-the-national-problem-gambling-helpline/

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2025). Gambling-related harms: Identification, assessment and management (NG248). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng248/chapter/recommendations

Riley, B. J., Oakes, J., and Lawn, S. (2024). Gambling Harm-Minimisation Tools and Their Impact on Gambling Behaviour: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(8), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21080998

von Hammerstein, C., Benyamina, A., and Luquiens, A. (2025). Long-term efficacy of an optimized online gambling self-exclusion procedure with extended suspension of commercial solicitations: A randomized controlled trial. Harm Reduction Journal, 22, 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01339-0

World Health Organization. (2024). Gambling. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/gambling