Dyslexia in College: What Students Can Request
A college student with dyslexia can request individualized academic adjustments and auxiliary aids that provide equal opportunity to participate in courses and demonstrate learning. Depending on functional needs and course requirements, examples include additional examination time, accessible textbooks, text-to-speech, speech-to-text, note-taking assistance, accessible digital materials, or a suitable examination environment. The precise arrangement follows an individualized review of the disability-related barrier and the skills being assessed. The U.S. Department of Education's postsecondary guidance explains these obligations and the role of students in requesting support.
A practical first step is to contact the college disability or accessibility services office, describe the actual reading or writing barriers, provide relevant previous records, and discuss effective adjustments early enough for implementation. Students may request accommodations after entering college, but the office may need time to prepare accessible course materials or testing arrangements. Formal accommodation approval and effective delivery are separate stages; both matter for meaningful participation.
Understanding Dyslexia at the University Level
A developmental reading disability across the lifespan
Dyslexia involves developmental difficulties with word reading and/or spelling that affect accuracy, speed, or both. The International Dyslexia Association's 2025 definition recognizes variation across languages, the continuum of severity, and complex genetic, neurobiological, and environmental contributions. Phonological and morphological processing difficulties are common, although they do not characterize every individual identically. Dyslexia often persists into adulthood, even when reading accuracy improves through education, practice, and compensatory strategies.
In college, a student may reason expertly about an argument, understand a lecture, or discuss an experiment while taking much longer to read unfamiliar terminology or draft a timed response. Academic accomplishment, high intelligence, and strong oral communication are compatible with substantial reading disability. A student's transcript alone may conceal the extra hours, extensive use of technology, or assistance needed to reach apparently ordinary outcomes. The scientific and administrative assessment of disability therefore attends to functioning and history rather than assuming that high grades negate impairment.
Why higher education increases literacy demands
University work combines substantial independent reading, rapid transitions between disciplines, unfamiliar technical words, digital portals, citations, and time-sensitive examination tasks. The difficulty can emerge when reading volume rises even if a student previously managed schoolwork successfully. Required readings may be supplied as inaccessible image scans, course instructions may change quickly, and writing assignments often demand simultaneous planning, reading, source integration, and transcription. These features can magnify the functional effects of slow decoding, reading fluency difficulties, and spelling problems.
Diagnosis, disability, and academic functioning
A clinical or psychoeducational assessment aims to describe the developmental learning difficulty and its cognitive and academic features. College disability services examine the information relevant to legal eligibility and reasonable academic access. These decisions overlap but serve different functions. A dyslexia diagnosis can be strong evidence of disability, yet it does not automatically settle whether an examination requires double time, text-to-speech, or another response. Conversely, neither an isolated low score nor a short online questionnaire establishes the full clinical or legal picture. Differential evaluation may consider instruction history, language exposure, sensory conditions, ADHD, or other co-occurring difficulties.
Federal Disability Rights in U.S. Colleges
Section 504, ADA Title II, and ADA Title III
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act prohibits disability discrimination in programs receiving federal financial assistance. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act generally applies to public universities, and Title III generally applies to private institutions covered by its public-accommodation provisions, subject to the statute's exemptions. These overlapping legal protections support equal educational opportunity through appropriate academic adjustments and auxiliary aids. Their application depends on the educational institution, particular program, and circumstances. See U.S. Department of Education guidance on academic adjustments and ADA Title III regulations.
An accommodation should address the disability-related access barrier while preserving legitimate essential requirements and the fundamental nature of the program. A college need not guarantee particular grades or waive genuinely essential competencies. It may also identify a different effective accommodation instead of the student's initially requested format. Decisions about fundamental alteration or undue burden require individualized analysis under the relevant rules. An institution should avoid treating a standard administrative practice as automatically essential without examining the educational objective and possible alternatives.
How postsecondary access differs from an IEP
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act governs eligible students in U.S. elementary and secondary education and creates responsibilities for a free appropriate public education. A college does not simply continue a high-school IDEA Individualized Education Program. Postsecondary disability services generally operate through a student's disclosure and request, evidence of functional needs, and the institution's own procedures under Section 504 and the ADA. Previous IEPs and Section 504 plans can nevertheless provide useful historical evidence, especially when accompanied by evaluations. The Office for Civil Rights transition guide explains the distinction.
Reasonable adjustments and essential academic requirements
The crucial analytic question is what an assessment actually measures. In a history examination, unusually slow word decoding may be incidental to historical reasoning; in a course where rapid independent reading is itself an essential outcome, some adjustments require closer analysis. Faculty, students, and accessibility professionals can examine the objective, the functional effect of dyslexia, and available effective alternatives. An adjustment might change a testing procedure without changing the standard of knowledge expected. U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights identifies academic adjustments and auxiliary aids as distinct means of access.
College Accommodations That May Help
Extra time for examinations
Extended time may be appropriate when slow reading, decoding of specialized vocabulary, or written output substantially interferes with an assessment designed to measure other academic knowledge. Common arrangements are time-and-a-half or double time, but neither amount is a universal dyslexia entitlement or a standardized clinical threshold. Individualized justification should connect the amount of time to observed barriers, task demands, and the skill the examination seeks to measure. The U.S. Department of Justice testing guidance offers a related framework for qualifying examinations administered by covered testing entities; a university course examination has its own setting and procedures.
The empirical evidence on extended time is nuanced. Runyan's university study examined reading comprehension under additional time in a small sample, while Gregg and Nelson's meta-analysis identified unresolved questions about effectiveness and score comparability across studies of adolescents transitioning into adulthood. Both the legal access purpose and the psychometric validity of individual tests require attention. Findings do not establish one optimal extension for all dyslexic students.
Quiet testing spaces, breaks, and alternative examination arrangements
A quieter room, scheduled breaks, the opportunity to use approved reading software, or adjusted presentation of complex materials may be relevant to particular functional limitations. Separate testing is often useful when speech-to-text or read-aloud tools would disturb other candidates. When attention problems coexist with dyslexia, the resulting support needs should be assessed specifically rather than inferred from the dyslexia label alone. Testing centers should preserve appropriate lighting, instructions, time accounting, and access to allowed materials.
Accessible textbooks and text-to-speech
Text-to-speech, synchronized highlighting, searchable electronic textbooks, and audiobooks can reduce decoding barriers when a course aims to evaluate subject knowledge rather than unaided reading. The Wood, Moxley, Tighe, and Wagner meta-analysis found a modest average improvement in comprehension from read-aloud technologies among students with reading disabilities, with substantial heterogeneity across study designs and participants. Individual benefit depends on listening comprehension, the text, and usability. This is evidence for a possible access aid, not proof that software eliminates the developmental reading disability.
Document design matters. A scanned PDF that contains only images may be unusable to a screen reader; diagrams with missing descriptions, malformed tables, and inaccessible mathematical formulas can interrupt comprehension. Colleges can improve access through correctly tagged PDFs, semantic headings, searchable text, digital alternative formats, and advance delivery. Course providers should consider how an accessible version will work in the specific software and examination setting rather than merely supplying a file labeled digital.
Lecture notes, recordings, and advance materials
Dyslexic students may find it difficult to read slides, listen to explanations, and simultaneously transcribe accurate notes. Advance access to slides, guided notes, lecture capture, accessible transcripts, or an approved note-taking arrangement can allow greater attention to the substance of instruction. Recording and transcript access must be coordinated with institutional policies concerning privacy, course materials, and intellectual property. An accommodation to record a class does not automatically authorize distribution of that recording.
Speech-to-text, spelling tools, and writing supports
Dictation software may reduce transcription demands for a student who can formulate complex thoughts orally but writes slowly. Spellcheck, word prediction, proofing aids, and structured digital templates can facilitate revision. Their utility varies with pronunciation, accent, specialized terminology, equations, and the accuracy of the generated transcript. The student's responsibility for research quality, argument, sourcing, and original intellectual work remains. Tools must be consistent with academic-integrity policies and the actual objective of an assessed writing task.
Deadlines and reduced course load
When intense reading volume or delayed accessible materials significantly affect progress, a student may request reasonable deadline flexibility, priority registration, or an adjusted course load. Such arrangements require individualized review of the curriculum, group responsibilities, attendance demands, and essential course outcomes. A deadline accommodation is not a blanket exemption from all assignments. Because a reduced load may affect financial aid, visa conditions, or progression, academic advising should participate where appropriate. The institution must examine whether an effective solution is available under the applicable disability rules.
How to Request Accommodations
Step one: find the disability services process
Most institutions have an accessibility or disability resource office. A student can contact it before classes begin or once academic barriers appear, request an explanation of the institution's written procedures, and describe anticipated needs. Useful questions concern the documentation accepted, the lead time for accessible textbooks, the method of arranging exams, and the contact for urgent problems. The Department of Education's student guide states that requests can be made at any time and recommends early communication.
Step two: describe concrete functional barriers
A focused account is more informative than a list of accommodations copied from another student's plan. Describe which activities are difficult and why: reading sixty pages of unfamiliar scientific vocabulary, producing handwritten answers under time pressure, interpreting densely formatted documents, or reading and writing concurrently during a laboratory course. Explain past strategies and their effectiveness. This makes it easier to connect an adjustment to the academic task without presenting dyslexia as a uniform profile.
Step three: assemble available documentation
Useful records include prior psychoeducational testing, diagnostic evaluation, a high-school IEP or Section 504 plan, a summary of academic achievement and functional performance, and an accommodation history. Test findings may concern single-word and pseudoword reading, fluency, spelling, written expression, and relevant language abilities. Documentation should be interpreted in the context of developmental history, language exposure, education, and present demands. The accessibility office can specify what information is genuinely needed to evaluate the requested support.
Step four: discuss a functional accommodation plan
An effective interactive discussion identifies an access barrier, a proposed adjustment, its intended operation, and how to evaluate whether it works. For example, extra testing time addresses slow reading under a deadline; accessible course materials address decoding and format barriers; or dictation permits content-rich responses when handwriting is incidental. Ask how the plan applies to online exams, labs, oral presentations, group assignments, or supervised placements. Federal disability guidance emphasizes individually appropriate adjustments rather than a closed menu of approved services. U.S. Department of Education disability FAQ.
Step five: implement the plan and resolve problems
The office may provide accommodation notices to instructors while keeping detailed medical or diagnostic documentation in a controlled file. Students should know when instructors will receive a notice and when testing-center bookings are due. If software cannot access a required examination, the accessible textbook is delayed, or an approved examination arrangement is omitted, document the specific problem and notify accessibility staff promptly. Internal grievance channels and relevant civil-rights processes may be available for unresolved disputes. An approved accommodation requires practical delivery.
Documentation and Assessment: Important Distinctions
Must a dyslexia assessment be new?
No single nationwide rule requires every dyslexic college student to buy a new comprehensive evaluation on a fixed three-year schedule. An institution may request reasonable documentation sufficient to establish a disability and the need for a particular academic adjustment. Relevant evidence may include an older diagnosis of a stable developmental condition and a substantial record of prior accommodations. A student can ask what current functional information is missing and whether existing records answer the question. The answer depends on the applicable institutional procedure and circumstances; OCR guidance provides the federal baseline.
What a comprehensive evaluation examines
When a new evaluation is appropriate, a qualified clinician or educational assessment specialist can integrate developmental history, prior instruction, academic records, standardized reading and spelling measures, and present functional impairment. The process may consider phonological processing, rapid naming, comprehension, written expression, and co-occurring conditions when indicated. Distinguishing screening from diagnosis and university eligibility determination is essential. A student whose English is an additional language requires attention to literacy experience in each language and valid interpretation of the tests selected.
Who pays for testing and support?
The Office for Civil Rights explains that a postsecondary institution generally is not required to pay for a new evaluation simply to document a student's disability. Students may explore health insurance, community clinics, vocational rehabilitation, or accessible assessment resources. This differs from the institution's responsibilities concerning academic adjustments and auxiliary aids required by law. Likewise, the law distinguishes required access aids from personal services such as ordinary private tutoring.
Can a high-school IEP or 504 plan transfer?
A previous plan can establish educational and accommodation history, and its supporting assessment may be informative. The IEP itself does not continue as a college IDEA plan. A postsecondary institution considers disability-related needs under its own applicable legal framework. Students approaching graduation from high school should retain relevant evaluations and evidence of how prior accommodations were implemented. See the OCR high-school transition guide.
Academic Support Alongside Accommodations
Reading strategies and academic time management
Students can organize lengthy readings into preview, detailed reading, and synthesis stages; annotate arguments rather than transcribing every sentence; and use a personal glossary for technical vocabulary. Spaced retrieval, assignment maps, and realistic revision periods may reduce the organizational cost of a high reading load. These are broadly plausible educational strategies, not a distinct clinical cure for dyslexia. Students may still require formal adjustments to achieve equivalent access even after learning effective study methods.
Tutoring, writing centers, and coaching
Writing centers can help with argument structure, research questions, and revision strategies. Academic tutoring can strengthen conceptual understanding of course content, while a study-skills advisor can support planning and scheduling. Such resources have different institutional and legal roles from required accommodations. Students should ask which services are publicly available to all enrollees, which are provided through a disability office, and whether additional support is fee-based. A coordinated plan may use several approaches without characterizing every helpful service as a required disability benefit.
Universal design and accessible faculty practice
Structured syllabi, advance reading lists, correctly tagged digital materials, consistent assignment instructions, and multiple ways to participate can help many learners. Students with dyslexia can still need individual accommodations in otherwise inclusive courses. The 2026 systematic review by Lombardo Pontillo and colleagues identified faculty awareness and inconsistent institutional implementation as important themes in higher education. These findings support institutional attention to accessibility while leaving the effectiveness of any particular redesign to be evaluated in context.
Academic integrity and emerging AI tools
Text-to-speech, dictation, spellcheck, citation managers, and organization tools can facilitate work that remains the student's own. Generative AI services may also produce unverified references, invent claims, or substitute for assessed reasoning. An accommodation needs to be reconciled with an institution's academic-integrity expectations and privacy obligations. Students should seek clear advance rules about approved tools and whether a more accessible alternative is available. Neither uncritical prohibition nor unrestricted use defines an individualized accessibility plan.
Assistive Technology: What Research Supports
Reading-aloud technologies
A 2018 meta-analysis by Wood and colleagues identified a modest average comprehension benefit from text-to-speech or related read-aloud technology in samples of students with reading disabilities. Findings varied across studies, and they do not establish identical improvements for every dyslexic university student or lasting remediation of decoding. College implementation should examine device compatibility, privacy, subject matter, and the task's learning objective. Students can test assistive tools on genuine materials before relying on them during an examination.
Dictation, word prediction, and software accessibility
Speech recognition may enable fluent drafting when a student possesses stronger spoken formulation than rapid transcription. Specialized vocabulary and citations still require proofreading, and dictated mathematical expressions often need additional editing. Word prediction and spelling correction can help with individual errors while occasionally introducing new ones. The observational and intervention literature on assistive technology is heterogeneous, so usability and individual effectiveness should be checked rather than assumed from a product's marketing. Academic support professionals can help students establish a reproducible workflow.
Dyslexia-friendly fonts and visual interventions
Students may prefer larger text, increased spacing, uncluttered pages, or changes in contrast. Personal visual comfort is a legitimate consideration, but dyslexia-specific claims about proprietary fonts require independent trials. A 2026 meta-analysis of fifteen studies reported no consistent improvement in children's reading speed or accuracy from specialized dyslexia-friendly fonts compared with conventional fonts. It did not establish that every student's visual preferences are identical. Azzarello, Paek, Hodge, Jameson, and Lewis, 2026.
Access technologies versus literacy intervention
Text-to-speech helps access the meaning of a course reading; systematic literacy instruction targets reading skills. A branded brain-training product, colored overlay, or speculative visual therapy should not be treated as a proven dyslexia remediation based on testimonials. Evaluation should examine comparison groups, real reading outcomes, follow-up, and conflicts of interest. Students wanting to strengthen decoding or spelling can seek qualified literacy assessment and appropriate instructional support in addition to college accommodations. For the scientific distinction, see Structured Literacy for Dyslexia: Principles and Evidence.
Psychological Well-Being and Student Identity
Stigma, confidentiality, and self-advocacy
Some students have experienced repeated criticism for slow reading or spelling errors and may anticipate disbelief when they request support. Disclosure decisions can therefore involve privacy, self-esteem, identity, and previous educational experiences. The disability office should explain the confidentiality of documentation and the information shared with instructors. Students can describe their access needs without distributing their entire diagnostic history across a class. Respectful support includes clear procedures and the opportunity to participate in decisions.
Anxiety, fatigue, and disproportionate effort
Dyslexia may increase the effort required to complete ordinary academic tasks, particularly when materials are inaccessible or accommodations arrive late. The 2026 systematic review of 34 studies identified anxiety, stigma, self-efficacy, resilience, and institutional inclusion as recurring higher-education concerns. These observational findings do not mean that every dyslexic student has a mental disorder or that dyslexia alone causes a particular psychological outcome. Students facing clinically significant anxiety or depression can seek qualified mental health support while continuing to address educational access.
ADHD and other co-occurring needs
Dyslexia may coexist with ADHD, language difficulties, dyscalculia, and other neurodevelopmental conditions. Slow reading and deadline problems should not automatically be attributed to attention disorder, while persistent organizational difficulties may deserve independent examination. An individualized college plan can address distinct difficulties in reading fluency, sustained attention, executive organization, and numerical reasoning when supported by relevant evidence. The 2025 IDA explanatory document recognizes co-occurrence. See also Dyslexia and ADHD: Co-Occurrence, Differences, and Evaluation.
Students whose academic access needs involve distinct attention or organization difficulties can consult the research chapter ADHD and Executive Function. Broader questions about neurodevelopmental diversity, autistic students, and identity are addressed in Autism and Adult Neurodiversity. These neighboring fields clarify separate scientific questions while the present article concentrates on dyslexia-related college accommodation and academic support.
Special College Contexts
Online and hybrid classes
Digital delivery creates opportunities for accessible learning and new technical obstacles. Automated quizzes may impose a fixed reading clock, lecture recordings may lack usable transcripts, and scanned textbook chapters may remain inaccessible to reading software. Students can request that approved accommodations be configured in learning management systems before examinations. Accessible online participation should be evaluated through practical testing rather than assumptions that any electronic file is readable.
Laboratories, internships, and clinical placements
A laboratory or professional placement may have safety-critical requirements and essential practical competencies. Accessible instructions, advance reading, alternative presentation of procedures, and appropriate planning can sometimes reduce unrelated reading barriers without changing those competencies. Decisions should involve students, faculty, disability services, and placement staff as applicable. An accommodation for an academic lecture does not automatically resolve different access questions in a clinical environment, and the relevant facts matter.
Graduate admissions and professional licensing examinations
Graduate entry tests and licensing examinations may be administered by organizations separate from the university. Their disability accommodation procedures can differ from the student's regular course arrangements. The Department of Justice's testing accommodation guidance discusses reasonable documentation, past accommodations, and examination fairness for covered entities. Students planning such examinations should check the testing provider's instructions early and should not assume a college approval letter alone completes the process.
Multilingual and international students
Dyslexia manifests within particular languages and orthographies, and students may read much more efficiently in one language than another. A difficulty with academic English can also reflect second-language acquisition, limited prior instruction, or interacting factors. The revised IDA definition of dyslexia explicitly recognizes differences among writing systems. An evaluation should consider literacy history in multiple languages and the cultural and linguistic validity of chosen measures. U.S. legal explanations in this article refer to U.S. institutions and should not be projected onto other national systems without checking local law.
Evidence Quality and Scientific Limitations
What is established
The U.S. civil-rights framework establishes legal duties for covered postsecondary programs; authoritative guidance illustrates potential academic adjustments and institutional procedures. Dyslexia's developmental word-reading and spelling profile is established in contemporary reading science. There is supporting empirical evidence that reading-aloud tools can help comprehension for some students with reading difficulties. A legally appropriate support arrangement may be necessary for equal access even when a randomized trial has not isolated its eventual effect on grades or graduation.
What remains limited
University accommodation studies vary by legal setting, population, diagnostic classification, and outcome. The Pino and Mortari 2014 systematic review used narrative synthesis to examine inclusion experiences, while the 2026 Lombardo Pontillo review synthesized more recent evidence and highlighted implementation inconsistencies. Self-reported benefits, observational links, and small samples must not be treated as definitive estimates of causal improvement in graduation rates.
Why interventions must be evaluated separately
Testing accommodations, accessible reading technology, writing assistance, targeted decoding instruction, and general tutoring have different mechanisms and goals. Positive findings about one category do not establish that another is effective. Studies may also combine dyslexia with dyscalculia, dysgraphia, or broadly defined learning disabilities. University practice should therefore combine individual functional assessment with scientific evidence relevant to the exact task, avoiding claims that one branded method or fixed service package benefits everyone.
A First-Semester Academic Support Plan
Before orientation
Locate accessibility services, retain copies of existing diagnostic and school records, review course reading requirements, and ask which accessible materials or assistive software can be arranged in advance. Where possible, request details about exam booking deadlines, faculty notification procedures, and contacts for resolving a technology failure. Clarify whether a specialized assessment is necessary before paying for one. A student can also consult an academic advisor about course sequencing and realistic workload.
During the opening weeks
Discuss functional barriers with accessibility services and instructors through the approved channels. Test text-to-speech with an actual required reading, confirm the format of lecture materials, and verify approved examination conditions before the first test. If a software tool fails or a document lacks accessible text, describe the problem promptly. The most useful feedback specifies what the student attempted, what prevented participation, and which proposed change might solve the problem.
At midsemester and after assessments
Review whether supports arrived on time, were usable in the relevant learning environment, and helped the student complete tasks with equitable opportunity. Course grades matter but are not the sole indicator: reading time, assignment completion, participation, and unnecessary fatigue also inform accessibility planning. Refine arrangements when evidence shows a mismatch between the approved method and the actual barrier. Preserve records that may help subsequent semesters and external examinations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a college student with dyslexia receive extra time?
Yes. Additional examination time is a possible academic adjustment when individualized evidence and the educational task support it. There is no single federally prescribed time multiplier for dyslexia across every examination. U.S. Department of Education, OCR.
Does a university have to accept a high-school IEP?
A college generally does not continue an IDEA IEP. The earlier plan and supporting evaluation may inform postsecondary accessibility review, but students normally request adjustments under the applicable ADA and Section 504 framework. U.S. Department of Education transition guide.
Can a student request accommodations halfway through the semester?
Yes. Requests may be made after enrollment or when difficulties become apparent, although early requests facilitate effective implementation and prior assessments are not necessarily retroactively changed. Students should promptly contact disability services about current and future academic barriers. Office for Civil Rights.
Does dyslexia automatically qualify someone for every support?
Accommodations are individualized. The student's documented functional needs, the educational task, and essential academic requirements determine which adjustments are appropriate. A fixed package based solely on a diagnosis does not substitute for an access assessment. Department of Education disability FAQ.
Can students use audiobooks and text-to-speech?
These may be appropriate auxiliary aids for accessing course content. Their suitability depends on what a task measures, the reading format, and individual needs. Evidence supports a modest average comprehension benefit in some groups, with substantial variation. Wood and colleagues, 2018.
Must students buy a new diagnosis every three years?
There is no universal U.S. college rule requiring a new comprehensive dyslexia evaluation on that fixed schedule. Institutions can request documentation reasonably relevant to the current request and may evaluate existing records. Students should seek clarification of specific documentation gaps. Office for Civil Rights.
Does using an accommodation undermine academic standards?
An appropriate adjustment changes the conditions under which a student accesses or demonstrates learning while respecting essential academic outcomes. Its validity depends on the specific assessment. Research on extra time and score comparability remains task-sensitive. Gregg and Nelson, 2012.
Conclusion
Dyslexia support in college is an individualized system of access, assessment, and effective implementation. Federal disability protections establish the relevant responsibilities for U.S. institutions, while clinical evidence and functional history explain what a particular student needs. Accessible materials, suitable examination arrangements, well-chosen technology, and proactive coordination can complement academic skills instruction and general university resources. The strongest approach identifies the actual educational objective, removes disability-related barriers when appropriate, and evaluates whether the solution works for the student in the real course environment.
Related Articles
Dyslexia Accommodations at School: IEP and 504 Plans — U.S. K–12 support law and the transition from school-based services.
Dyslexia in Adults: Symptoms, Assessment, and Daily Life — Adult manifestations and practical implications beyond college.
Dyslexia Testing: Screening, Evaluation, and Diagnosis — The differences between screening, professional evaluation, and diagnosis.
Dyslexia and ADHD: Co-Occurrence, Differences, and Evaluation — Distinct reading and attention needs in differential assessment.
Structured Literacy for Dyslexia: Principles and Evidence — Targeted literacy instruction as a separate scientific intervention.
References
Azzarello, C., Paek, S., Hodge, C., Jameson, M., and Lewis, J. (2026). Does font improve reading in dyslexic children?: Meta-analysis of dyslexia-friendly fonts and dyslexic children's reading performance. Annals of Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-026-00389-8
Gregg, N., and Nelson, J. M. (2012). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of extra time as a test accommodation for transitioning adolescents with learning disabilities: More questions than answers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355484
International Dyslexia Association. (2025). Definition of dyslexia. https://dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia/
International Dyslexia Association. (2025). Explanation: 2025 dyslexia definition explanation. https://dyslexiaida.org/explanation-2025-dyslexia-definition-explanation/
Lombardo Pontillo, A., Álvarez Andrade, M., Andreu, L., and Oliva, P. (2026). University trajectories and psychological well-being of students with specific learning disorders: A systematic literature review. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261433016
Pino, M., and Mortari, L. (2014). The inclusion of students with dyslexia in higher education: A systematic review using narrative synthesis. Dyslexia, 20(4), 346–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1484
Runyan, M. K. (1991). The effect of extra time on reading comprehension scores for university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949102400207
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2011). Students with disabilities preparing for postsecondary education: Know your rights and responsibilities. https://www.ed.gov/higher-education/students-disabilities-preparing-postsecondary-education
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2025). Disability discrimination: Academic adjustments for postsecondary students. https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/civil-rights-laws/disability-discrimination/disability-discrimination-key-issues/disability-discrimination-academic-adjustments-postsecondary-students
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2026). Frequently asked questions: Disability discrimination. https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/civil-rights-laws/disability-discrimination/frequently-asked-questions-disability-discrimination
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2026). Transition of students with disabilities to postsecondary education: A guide for high school educators. https://www.ed.gov/teaching-and-administration/supporting-students/transition-of-students-with-disabilities-to-postsecondary-education-a-guide-for-high-school-educators
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. (2010). Americans with Disabilities Act Title III regulations. https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/regulations/title-iii-regulations/
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. (2015). ADA requirements: Testing accommodations. https://www.ada.gov/resources/testing-accommodations/
Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., and Wagner, R. K. (2018). Does use of text-to-speech and related read-aloud tools improve reading comprehension for students with reading disabilities? A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416688170