What appearance anxiety means
Appearance anxiety is the apprehension that other people will notice, judge, reject, ridicule, or devalue someone because of their appearance. Its central psychological feature is an anticipated social evaluation: a person imagines how their face, skin, hair, body shape, weight, height, visible difference, clothing, or other characteristics may be interpreted by an observer, and experiences distress or changes behavior in response. This fear can arise during ordinary activities, including meeting friends, speaking at work, eating in public, attending a class, dating, being photographed, exercising, or joining a video call.
Appearance anxiety ranges from short-lived discomfort to persistent distress and substantial restriction of social life. It is an appearance-focused experience that can occur within several psychological conditions and outside clinical disorders. The phrase itself does not designate a single DSM or ICD diagnosis. Researchers have operationalized overlapping but distinct aspects through the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale, the Social Physique Anxiety Scale, and the Appearance Anxiety Inventory. Their different purposes are an important reason to define the target of assessment precisely Hart et al., 2008; Hart, Leary, and Rejeski, 1989; Veale et al., 2014.
A useful distinction is between appearance evaluation and appearance-related threat. Someone may dislike a feature of their appearance while feeling comfortable in public; another person may feel generally satisfied with their looks yet become distressed when photographed, watched, or compared with others. Appearance dissatisfaction describes an evaluation of the body; appearance anxiety concerns apprehension about consequences, particularly interpersonal consequences. The two often coexist, but their experiences, measurements, and intervention targets do not completely overlap.
How fear of appearance judgment is experienced
Thoughts and predictions
Typical thoughts include expectations that others will stare, criticize, compare, or remember an allegedly undesirable feature. The person may assume that their appearance will dominate an interaction, that a small imperfection will be obvious, or that observers will infer unattractiveness, inadequacy, poor health, or social status from a visible characteristic. These predictions can become highly specific: a photograph will be posted, an acquaintance will comment, a date will lose interest, or coworkers will interpret a skin condition negatively. Their significance arises from the predicted social consequences rather than any objectively measured property of the body.
Fear of negative evaluation is a wider cognitive process found in social anxiety. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in October 2026 synthesized 143 studies and 146 samples, totaling 80,285 participants, and reported a pooled correlation of r = .53 between fear of negative evaluation and social anxiety, with considerable between-study heterogeneity. This supports a substantial association while leaving room for different cultural, measurement, and personal contexts. The study assessed general fear of negative evaluation, not appearance anxiety as a distinct causal diagnosis Peng et al., 2026.
Emotions, physical sensations, and attention
People may experience embarrassment, shame, dread, self-consciousness, frustration, or vulnerability. A racing heart, sweating, facial warmth, trembling, or gastrointestinal discomfort can heighten the sense of being conspicuous. Attention can narrow toward a feared feature or bodily sensation: noticing a blemish, mentally checking posture, watching for blushing, or imagining how one's face looks while speaking. This self-focused attention competes with attention to what other people actually say and do. Cognitive models of social anxiety describe how negative self-images, safety behaviors, and preoccupation with internal cues can sustain anxious interpretation NICE CG159.
Behaviors and social consequences
Some people cancel plans or avoid photographs, changing rooms, gyms, beaches, medical appointments, dating, presentations, bright lighting, or video cameras. Others remain present but conceal a feature, position their bodies carefully, use a particular camera angle, apply repeated makeup, check reflective surfaces, seek reassurance, or monitor whether others are looking. Such actions can provide immediate relief. Their long-term effects depend on context and frequency: a reasonable accommodation or personal grooming choice differs from a rigid pattern that repeatedly restricts valued activities.
A clinically useful question is whether the person can act freely in the presence of some appearance-related uncertainty. If participation becomes contingent on complete concealment, repeated verification, or certainty that nobody will judge, daily life can progressively contract. Avoidance also limits opportunities to discover that feared social outcomes may not occur or that a difficult interaction can be tolerated.
Scientific models of appearance-related fear
Social-evaluative threat and cognitive models
Social anxiety models explain a sequence involving perceived danger of negative evaluation, heightened self-monitoring, negatively biased interpretations, safety behaviors, and post-event rumination. Appearance can serve as the specific feared basis for disapproval. In the Clark and Wells and Heimberg traditions, a person may use bodily feelings and imagined observer-perspective images as evidence of how they appear, although internal experience is not a direct measure of observers' impressions. A review of safety behaviors in social anxiety found theoretical and empirical support for their role in preventing the disconfirmation of feared outcomes, while also emphasizing differences among behaviors and research methods Piccirillo et al., 2016; NICE CG159.
Anticipatory processing can begin hours or days before a social event. During it, the person mentally rehearses an undesirable encounter, scans their appearance, and predicts humiliation. Afterward, selective recollection of pauses, facial expressions, or perceived staring can strengthen the original belief. This sequence should be assessed against actual contextual evidence: appearance discrimination, bullying, and intrusive comments can be genuine environmental events, so treatment also considers safety, support, and social conditions rather than treating every concern as a mistaken prediction.
Body-image investment and self-worth
Appearance is one possible component of identity and social meaning. When personal worth or anticipated acceptance becomes strongly conditional on appearing a certain way, even ambiguous social reactions may feel threatening. The Appearance Schemas Inventory-Revised assesses self-evaluative salience and motivational salience: how much appearance affects a person's judgment of self-worth, and how much attention and effort are devoted to appearance-related practices. These dimensions help explain why similar social events can be experienced differently Cash, Melnyk, and Hrabosky, 2004.
Motivational interest in clothing, grooming, fitness, or style is common and can be pleasurable. Clinically significant concern becomes more evident when appearance-based self-evaluation, distress, repetitive behavior, and loss of flexibility reinforce each other. Appearance anxiety may therefore occur without broad dissatisfaction with all body features, and intense dissatisfaction does not automatically imply a clinical anxiety disorder.
Social comparison, ideals, and self-objectification
Appearance comparison involves evaluating one's looks in relation to another person, image, or socially prescribed ideal. Upward comparison can make perceived shortcomings more salient; downward comparison or selective comparison may have different outcomes. A 2025 review of longitudinal and ecological momentary studies found small but statistically significant bidirectional prospective links between appearance comparison and body dissatisfaction in the female samples suitable for meta-analysis. The magnitude and direction depended on how comparison was defined, and findings cannot be assumed to transfer unchanged to every age, gender, or cultural setting Ooi et al., 2025.
Objectification and appearance-surveillance frameworks further propose that persistent attention to how the body looks from an observer's viewpoint can intensify self-consciousness. Such models illuminate possible mechanisms; a particular person's appearance anxiety still requires individual assessment. Observational association among comparison, surveillance, and distress is not proof of a single universal causal pathway.
Why appearance anxiety develops and persists
Personal learning and significant social experiences
Appearance-related teasing, bullying, humiliation, stereotyping, appearance-based rejection, and repeated unsolicited commentary can make social evaluation feel dangerous. Negative events may generate specific expectations about future contexts: a remark about acne at school may influence later reluctance to attend meetings or be photographed. These experiences interact with temperament, social anxiety vulnerability, coping patterns, supportive relationships, and the meanings attached to appearance. Research does not identify one necessary pathway or a single personality type.
Some people experience genuine appearance-based prejudice, including weight stigma, racism, colorism, ableism, ageism, and discrimination related to a visible difference. Anxiety may therefore contain a realistic appraisal of social risk alongside exaggerated generalizations. An ethically adequate response recognizes the external social environment, provides protection where needed, and supports agency rather than requiring a person to accept mistreatment.
Changes in body, health, and life stage
Puberty introduces rapid bodily change and heightened peer visibility. Acne, scars, hair loss, burns, birthmarks, disability-related appearance differences, medical treatment effects, and age-related changes may alter how someone experiences public attention. The size or visibility of a difference does not determine the level of psychological distress. Social support, previous experiences, self-concept, disclosure choices, and interpersonal responses matter. A systematic review of interventions for adults with visible differences documented adjustment and social-anxiety concerns in some populations but found limited high-quality evidence about which psychosocial programs work best Norman and Moss, 2015.
Appearance concerns may also vary during pregnancy, postpartum recovery, illness, menopause, gender-related transitions, or recovery from injury. The psychological meaning of these changes is individualized. Clinical interpretation should not pathologize the person's body, gender identity, disability, age, or chosen presentation.
Digital environments and uncertainty about being observed
Photographs, short-form video, beauty filters, online comments, profile images, and video calls allow appearance to be viewed repeatedly and sometimes outside a person's control. Content emphasizing idealized looks may invite comparison, while image editing can blur expectations about what is typical. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis found an association between online social comparison and body-image concerns and eating-disorder symptoms. The studies were heterogeneous, and the observed associations alone do not establish that a particular platform or beauty filter caused an individual's anxiety Bonfanti et al., 2025.
For appearance anxiety specifically, digital behavior may include repeatedly previewing photos, deleting images, avoiding the camera, adjusting filters, or searching for reactions after posting. Whether such behaviors maintain distress depends on their function and flexibility. The psychological impact of synthetic or AI-generated beauty imagery remains an evolving research domain; claims about precise algorithm-specific effects require stronger longitudinal and experimental evidence than presently available across diverse populations.
Avoidance and safety behaviors: the maintaining cycle
Immediate relief and longer-term learning
Consider someone who fears that a perceived facial asymmetry will provoke criticism at a gathering. Staying home lowers distress in the moment. Yet the person gains little new information about how others would actually respond or whether participation would remain possible despite self-consciousness. At the next invitation, the anticipated threat can feel similarly compelling. Avoidance may spread from photographs to social events, then to work or health care. The resulting pattern combines predictions, anxiety, short-term relief, reduced opportunities for corrective learning, and greater restriction.
Safety behaviors can be less visible. They include rehearsing every interaction, seeking repeated assurances that a feature is acceptable, arranging lighting, covering part of the face, refusing spontaneous photographs, or staying at the edge of groups. In cognitive behavioral treatment, clinicians investigate whether each behavior protects against actual danger, accommodates a legitimate need, or maintains a feared prediction. Abruptly removing a meaningful accommodation without collaboration can undermine care. A graded, collaborative approach tests the role of the behavior while preserving personal safety and consent Piccirillo et al., 2016.
Checking, concealment, and reassurance
Checking and avoidance can coexist. A person might repeatedly inspect a feature in private while avoiding any situation in which others might see it. Checking may produce temporary certainty, but another light, mirror, angle, or social cue can restart doubt. Reassurance from friends may similarly reduce distress for a short period yet lead to repeated requests. The Appearance Anxiety Inventory was developed as a measure of processes including threat monitoring and avoidance in body dysmorphic disorder, rather than as a diagnostic test for every instance of appearance concern Veale et al., 2014.
Anticipation and post-event review
Avoidance is also cognitive. Long before a public appearance, a person may imagine insults or rejection, mentally rehearse responses, or search for signs that a flaw is worsening. After an event, they may replay social exchanges and treat ambiguous expressions as evidence of criticism. An assessment needs to establish the feared prediction, the environmental evidence, the person's coping resources, and any history of actual victimization. These details determine which elements are suitable for cognitive work, graded exposure, protective action, or interpersonal support.
Appearance anxiety, social anxiety disorder, and body dysmorphic disorder
Ordinary appearance concern and clinically meaningful impairment
Concern about looking presentable, feeling nervous in a photograph, or preferring a particular hairstyle is part of ordinary social life. Clinical assessment becomes important when fear is persistent, distressing, disproportionate to the context, or repeatedly interferes with relationships, education, employment, self-care, or health services. Functional impairment and the nature of the underlying symptoms matter more than an isolated self-report score.
Social anxiety disorder
Social anxiety disorder involves marked fear or anxiety about one or more social situations in which a person may be scrutinized, with associated avoidance or endurance under intense fear, persistence, and clinically significant distress or impairment. The feared negative evaluation may center on blushing, trembling, perceived unattractiveness, awkward behavior, visible anxiety, or multiple aspects of self-presentation. Appearance anxiety can therefore be one prominent theme within social anxiety disorder. Formal diagnosis evaluates the full pattern and duration and considers alternative explanations NICE CG159.
In someone with social anxiety disorder, appearance may be only one of several feared grounds for rejection. They might also worry about speaking incorrectly, seeming boring, or being visibly nervous. Assessment asks whether fear generalizes across social settings, how behavior changes in them, and how much functioning is affected. The validated Social Appearance Anxiety Scale captures a related construct but does not alone establish social anxiety disorder Hart et al., 2008.
Body dysmorphic disorder
Body dysmorphic disorder, or BDD, centers on preoccupation with one or more perceived defects or flaws in physical appearance that others do not observe or that appear slight, together with repetitive behaviors or mental acts such as mirror checking, comparison, grooming, or reassurance seeking, and clinically significant distress or impairment. A person may avoid being seen because of the feared feature, but appearance anxiety and avoidance alone do not establish BDD. Assessment needs to explore the degree and nature of preoccupation, repetitive responses, insight, functional interference, and competing diagnoses. The concern must also be differentiated from weight or shape preoccupation better accounted for by an eating disorder NICE CG31.
BDD can carry substantial depression and suicide risk. NICE recommends assessment of self-harm and suicide risk for people diagnosed with BDD, particularly in the presence of depression, along with evidence-based BDD-focused care. Persistent preoccupation, significant rituals, severe isolation, or suicidal thoughts call for timely assessment by a qualified professional. Immediate danger requires local emergency or crisis services NICE CG31.
Eating disorders, muscle dysmorphia, and body dissatisfaction
Eating disorders have their own diagnostic criteria and treatment pathways. Appearance anxiety may accompany eating-related psychopathology, yet it does not in itself indicate anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, or another feeding or eating disorder. A meta-analysis of 69 studies, totaling 41,257 participants, reported a correlation of approximately .51 between social physique anxiety and eating-disorder-related measures, with substantial variation by context and assessment. This establishes an association rather than a diagnostic rule or proof of causation Alcaraz-Ibáñez, Paterna, and Griffiths, 2023.
Muscle dysmorphia is a recognized presentation or specifier of BDD in relevant diagnostic frameworks, involving preoccupation with the idea that one's body is insufficiently muscular or lean. It requires assessment of appearance preoccupation, repetitive behavior, distress, and impairment. Ordinary interest in exercise or muscular development is not equivalent to muscle dysmorphia. Body dissatisfaction more broadly concerns negative body evaluation and can be present without a psychiatric disorder.
Appearance anxiety and visible difference
People with scarring, birthmarks, facial difference, skin conditions, disability-related changes, or other visible differences may worry about actual unwanted attention or discrimination. Their circumstances should be approached as lived social experiences. A visible difference is not a psychiatric symptom, and neither concealment nor disclosure is inherently pathological. Psychological support can address anticipatory distress, confidence, coping with intrusive questions, valued participation, and responses to stigma while respecting personal preferences Norman and Moss, 2015.
Measurement and clinical assessment
Social Appearance Anxiety Scale
The Social Appearance Anxiety Scale (SAAS) was developed to assess anxiety about negative evaluation of one's overall appearance. Its original psychometric evaluation involved three undergraduate samples and supported a one-factor structure and satisfactory reliability, together with meaningful associations with social anxiety and body-image concerns. That evidence establishes a research instrument, subject to the usual need to confirm appropriateness for a specific language, population, age group, and setting. A numerical score should not be converted into a diagnosis without a validated clinical procedure Hart et al., 2008.
Social Physique Anxiety Scale
The Social Physique Anxiety Scale (SPAS) focuses particularly on apprehension that other people will evaluate one's physique, an especially relevant concern in exercise or body-exposing settings. Its historical development helped operationalize a narrower domain than global appearance-related social evaluation. Using a scale with a physique emphasis to make claims about all facial, grooming, or visible-difference concerns requires careful justification Hart, Leary, and Rejeski, 1989.
Appearance Anxiety Inventory
The Appearance Anxiety Inventory (AAI) examines appearance-focused cognitive and behavioral processes originally studied in BDD, including avoidance and threat monitoring. In the original validation, the factor structure differed between a clinical BDD sample and a nonclinical community sample, a useful reminder that scores and subscales can behave differently across groups. A later psychometric study in 182 adolescents referred to BDD specialty clinics supported its clinical usefulness but identified threat monitoring, camouflaging, and avoidance as three factors in that sample. The instrument can inform formulation and tracking; it is not a standalone diagnostic procedure Veale et al., 2014; Gumpert et al., 2024.
A full clinical interview
A comprehensive assessment explores the onset and duration of fear; the specific anticipated social consequence; avoided contexts; checking, reassurance, or concealment; mood and depressive symptoms; eating-related symptoms where indicated; physical health and visible difference; experiences of bullying or discrimination; and interference with daily goals. Clinicians ask whether the central fear is scrutiny in social settings, preoccupation with a perceived physical defect, an eating-related disturbance, trauma-related threat, or a combination. Standardized measures supplement this interview and can track change when chosen for an appropriate purpose NICE CG159; NICE CG31.
Screening instruments identify patterns meriting further evaluation. Assessment integrates an individual's history and functioning. Diagnosis applies formal criteria through a qualified clinical process. Treatment follows a formulation of the person's problems and goals. These four activities serve different purposes and should remain distinct in research communication.
What interventions can help?
Cognitive behavioral therapy for social-evaluative fear
When appearance anxiety is part of social anxiety disorder, disorder-specific individual cognitive behavioral therapy has established guideline support. Treatment examines feared predictions, shifts excessive self-focused attention toward the interaction, reviews interpretations of ambiguous social cues, reduces maintaining safety behaviors where appropriate, and uses collaborative behavioral experiments or graduated exposure. The point of exposure is to develop flexible engagement with valued situations while learning about predictions and tolerating uncertainty, not to force a person into appearance scrutiny or actual harassment NICE CG159.
For example, someone who regularly declines video calls may collaboratively test a brief, meaningful call without repeated camera-angle checking, with careful attention to what actually happens and what they learn. The plan should be adapted to the individual's health needs, circumstances, consent, and degree of distress. Research support is strongest for treatment of diagnosed social anxiety disorder rather than for every nonclinical form of appearance concern.
Targeted treatment when BDD is present
For BDD, care must specifically address appearance preoccupation, repetitive checking and mental rituals, avoidance, and associated impairment. NICE recommends CBT incorporating exposure and response prevention at several levels of adult impairment and combinations with medication for severe presentations. Clinical decisions about SSRIs depend on diagnosis, severity, age, medical context, preference, and professional monitoring. General advice about confidence or cosmetic improvement does not replace specialized BDD assessment and care NICE CG31.
Support following a visible difference or stigma
For individuals managing a visible difference, psychologically informed support may include cognitive behavioral techniques, social confidence work, preparation for intrusive questions, peer support, and strategies to address discrimination. Available systematic-review evidence for adult visible-difference interventions has historically been limited in trial quality and unable to establish an optimal delivery format, dose, or duration. This calls for individualized care and careful outcome monitoring rather than inflated claims of efficacy Norman and Moss, 2015.
Self-compassion and broader body-image work
Some approaches target self-criticism, body shame, or rigid appearance-based self-worth. Compassion-focused and body-image interventions may support a less punitive relationship with the body, yet the effects of any intervention on appearance-related fear of social evaluation must be measured specifically. Improvements in body satisfaction or self-compassion cannot automatically be interpreted as remission of social anxiety disorder or BDD. When avoidance and impairment are substantial, evidence-based diagnosis-specific care remains central.
Practical methods informed by psychological research
A useful self-observation exercise begins with identifying a concrete avoided situation and describing the prediction attached to it: what is feared, how certain it feels, and what behavior is used to prevent the outcome. The person can then distinguish reasonable personal preferences and actual safety requirements from repeated checks or rules that limit participation. Where appropriate, gradual re-engagement can focus on activities that matter, with evaluation of real experiences instead of relying only on anxious forecasts.
People can also review how photo editing, mirror checking, social comparison, and post-event rumination affect them in daily life. Choosing environments that offer genuine support and challenging discriminatory treatment are legitimate parts of coping. Persistent avoidance, marked distress, intense repetitive checking, or significant impairment justify professional evaluation rather than an escalating sequence of self-tests.
Evidence strength and unresolved questions
The conceptual separation of general body dissatisfaction, social appearance anxiety, and BDD is supported by clinical frameworks and psychometric studies. The links between general fear of negative evaluation and social anxiety, and between social physique anxiety and eating-disorder measures, are supported by systematic syntheses; correlations do not prove individual causation Peng et al., 2026; Alcaraz-Ibáñez, Paterna, and Griffiths, 2023.
Cognitive behavioral treatment of diagnosed social anxiety disorder and BDD has guideline support, although the specific therapeutic protocols differ NICE CG159; NICE CG31. The effect of treating appearance anxiety as a standalone transdiagnostic symptom is less firmly established. Many appearance scales were initially evaluated in students or selected clinical populations, and their validity cannot be assumed for all children, older adults, cultures, gender identities, disability groups, and language versions without appropriate studies.
Key open questions include how appearance-specific fears develop over time; which combinations of stigma, online comparison, self-surveillance, and existing anxiety vulnerability confer greatest risk; how well measurement tools function across populations; and how social and clinical interventions can complement each other. Research on AI-generated idealized faces, algorithmic personalization, and face-altering filters also needs stronger designs that separate technology exposure from preexisting concerns, broader social norms, and offline discrimination.
Everyday life, professional practice, and public health
Appearance anxiety can affect education, professional opportunity, friendship, dating, exercise, health care, and participation in community life. The consequences often flow through restriction of activity and expectations of rejection, which means outward appearance alone cannot predict distress. Supportive schools and workplaces can discourage appearance-based ridicule and offer appropriate privacy and accommodation. Clinicians can ask directly about feared judgment, avoidance, distress, safety behaviors, functioning, and actual discrimination, while respecting appearance choices and personal autonomy.
Public-health interventions can address teasing, biased standards of acceptability, accessibility, and media literacy. Such changes may reduce external pressures but require rigorous evaluation before their impact on clinical appearance anxiety can be quantified. A scientifically grounded approach attends to both individual psychological processes and social environments that shape the prospect of being judged.
Frequently asked questions
Is appearance anxiety a mental disorder?
Appearance anxiety is an experience or measurable psychological construct. Depending on its full presentation, it can occur within social anxiety disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, other conditions, or outside any clinical diagnosis. A professional assessment is needed when distress or impairment is substantial.
Can someone experience appearance anxiety without disliking their body?
Yes. A person can value or generally accept their appearance while fearing scrutiny, unwanted attention, photographs, or negative social judgments in particular settings. Body satisfaction and social-evaluative fear capture related but distinct dimensions.
Why does avoiding photographs or public events sometimes make fear stronger?
Avoidance can reduce distress immediately while limiting opportunities to learn how social situations actually unfold or how uncertainty can be tolerated. Repeated avoidance and safety behaviors are important targets in cognitive models of social anxiety. Their function should be evaluated in the person's actual safety and social context.
Is checking a mirror or asking for reassurance always a problem?
No. The context, flexibility, frequency, motivation, and consequences matter. Repetitive checking or reassurance becomes clinically relevant when it consumes time, reinforces distress, or interferes with valued activities, especially in a broader pattern suggestive of BDD.
How is social appearance anxiety different from social physique anxiety?
Social appearance anxiety refers to anticipated negative evaluation of overall appearance, while social physique anxiety emphasizes how the physique or bodily form may be judged. The SAAS and SPAS were developed with these different emphases and cannot be treated as identical measures.
When should a person seek professional support?
An assessment is warranted when concerns repeatedly disrupt social participation, work, education, relationships, medical care, or daily routines; when appearance preoccupation and repetitive behaviors are intense; or when depressed mood or eating-related symptoms coexist. Suicidal thoughts or immediate danger require urgent assistance from local emergency or crisis services.
Related Articles
Body Image and Appearance Psychology — the published research chapter on multidimensional body image, social evaluation, clinical concerns, and interventions.
Social Media and Body Image: Appearance Comparison, Ideals, and Mental Health — digital comparison and appearance ideals as a related scientific domain.
Social Comparison on Social Media: Mental Health, Body Image, and Self-Evaluation — comparative self-evaluation in online settings.
OCD vs Body Dysmorphic Disorder: Differences, Appearance Rituals, Insight, Treatment — clinical boundaries when appearance checking resembles compulsive behavior.
Body Shame: Psychological Causes and Consequences — explains shame, avoidance and appearance-related self-criticism.
Body Checking and Reassurance Seeking: Appearance Monitoring and Distress — reviews body checking, reassurance seeking and distress-maintaining cycles.
Body Dysmorphic Disorder vs Social Anxiety: Appearance-Related Fears — contrasts clinical BDD with social anxiety.
References
Alcaraz-Ibáñez, M., Paterna, A., and Griffiths, M. D. (2023). Social physical anxiety and eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Body Image, 45, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.02.008
Bonfanti, R. C., et al. (2025). The association between social comparison in social media, body image concerns and eating disorder symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Body Image, 52, 101841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101841
Cash, T. F., Melnyk, S. E., and Hrabosky, J. I. (2004). The assessment of body image investment: An extensive revision of the Appearance Schemas Inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10264
Gumpert, M., Rautio, D., Monzani, B., Jassi, A., Krebs, G., Fernández de la Cruz, L., Mataix-Cols, D., and Jansson-Fröjmark, M. (2024). Psychometric evaluation of the Appearance Anxiety Inventory in adolescents with body dysmorphic disorder. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 53, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2023.2299837
Hart, E. A., Leary, M. R., and Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.11.1.94
Hart, T. A., Flora, D. B., Palyo, S. A., Fresco, D. M., Holle, C., and Heimberg, R. G. (2008). Development and examination of the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale. Assessment, 15, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107306673
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2005). Obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder: Treatment (CG31). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg31/chapter/Recommendations
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Social anxiety disorder: Recognition, assessment and treatment (CG159). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg159/chapter/Recommendations
Norman, A., and Moss, T. P. (2015). Psychosocial interventions for adults with visible differences: A systematic review. PeerJ, 3, e870. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.870
Ooi, W. L., Nasser, H., Simmons, J., and Krug, I. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the temporal relationship between appearance comparisons and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 53, 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101885
Peng, S., et al. (2026). The relationship between fear of negative evaluation and social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychology, 14, 1458. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05211-z
Piccirillo, M. L., Taylor Dryman, M., and Heimberg, R. G. (2016). Safety behaviors in adults with social anxiety: Review and future directions. Behavior Therapy, 47, 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2015.11.005
Veale, D., Eshkevari, E., Kanakam, N., Ellison, N., Costa, A., and Werner, T. (2014). The Appearance Anxiety Inventory: Validation of a process measure in the treatment of body dysmorphic disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 42, 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465813000556